Because of morally bankrupt, exceptionally puerile ‘arguments’ like this one [1], which, as so much other radical feminista propaganda does, encourages women – especially those who are virgins – to lower their standards and have sex because “Sex is amazing, liberating and a power to be exerted over others”, among other things.
And here I thought the feminist movement was not supposed to be defined by our sex (and having sex) but instead who we were as human beings rather than sex objects …
Hat tip: Daniel Gelernter at Phi Beta Cons [2]
Related: Here’s a must-read [3] from Dawn Eden [4], who provides some very valuable insight on the ‘sexual revolution.’
Prior:
- From pro-abortion to pro-life: My thoughts on the 34th anniversay of Roe v. Wade [5]
- Abstinence for adults: so passé [6]
- Radical feminism: you reap what you sow [7]
- A story about the modern day ‘feminist movement’ [8]
- Male “heterosupremacy” to blame in brutal rape and murder of young Iraqi girl [9]
- Ruth Marcus: This is an era where we need less “manliness” [11]
- The cover-up of the rape of an 11 year old [12]
- Planned Parenthood pulls a NARAL [13]
- Planned Parenthood Toronto: Making condoms ‘fun’ [14]
- NOW: Losing its potency? [15]
- NARAL’s ‘Screw Abstinence’ party – update [16]