<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Democrats in turmoil: Hispanic Caucus leader accused of sexism, SF Mayor admits to affair with married woman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:20:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mwalimu Daudi</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-692167</link>
		<dc:creator>Mwalimu Daudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 04:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/#comment-692167</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250058,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The race war in the Democrat Party heats up.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250058,00.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The race war in the Democrat Party heats up.</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-691555</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/#comment-691555</guid>
		<description>SF is a shell of what it used to be.  The population has been declining for years.  I think about 8 kids under the age of 12 actually live there now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SF is a shell of what it used to be.  The population has been declining for years.  I think about 8 kids under the age of 12 actually live there now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-691471</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/#comment-691471</guid>
		<description>Why should San Franciscans be surprised at what Mayor Newsom was doing to the wife of his Deputy Chief of Staff?  After all, he&#039;s been doing that to the rest of the city for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should San Franciscans be surprised at what Mayor Newsom was doing to the wife of his Deputy Chief of Staff?  After all, he&#8217;s been doing that to the rest of the city for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-691213</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/#comment-691213</guid>
		<description>More proof that things are great if the Sanchez sisters are attacking the male dominated Latino race hustling industry leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More proof that things are great if the Sanchez sisters are attacking the male dominated Latino race hustling industry leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stackja</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-691097</link>
		<dc:creator>stackja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/#comment-691097</guid>
		<description>And just what the heck is in the water in California?   Gaygle? What you do with water to clear the throat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just what the heck is in the water in California?   Gaygle? What you do with water to clear the throat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geezer</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-690687</link>
		<dc:creator>geezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 05:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/#comment-690687</guid>
		<description>If one&#039;s political icon is a serial sexual predator, well... we all should turn our attention to finding a suitable replacement for &quot;duh!&quot;  It&#039;s so last century, much like what these schmucks have to offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one&#8217;s political icon is a serial sexual predator, well&#8230; we all should turn our attention to finding a suitable replacement for &#8220;duh!&#8221;  It&#8217;s so last century, much like what these schmucks have to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stoo</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-690611</link>
		<dc:creator>stoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/#comment-690611</guid>
		<description>Waitaminnit!!!  Joe Baca and Bob Dornan agree on something?  He&#039;s been calling Sanchez that for years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waitaminnit!!!  Joe Baca and Bob Dornan agree on something?  He&#8217;s been calling Sanchez that for years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mwalimu Daudi</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-690606</link>
		<dc:creator>Mwalimu Daudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/#comment-690606</guid>
		<description>I wonder how many of these Democrat &quot;womyn&quot; went &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediaresearch.org/press/1998/press19980706.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;down on their kneepads&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; time and time again to defend William Jefferson Clinton? It seems to me to be a little late for them to go all Puritain on us now. Sanchez &amp; Co. are simply reaping what they have sown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how many of these Democrat &#8220;womyn&#8221; went <a href="http://www.mediaresearch.org/press/1998/press19980706.asp" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>down on their kneepads</strong></a> time and time again to defend William Jefferson Clinton? It seems to me to be a little late for them to go all Puritain on us now. Sanchez &amp; Co. are simply reaping what they have sown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stoo</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-690595</link>
		<dc:creator>stoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/#comment-690595</guid>
		<description>It appears that Newsom has some &lt;a href=&quot;http://junkyardblog.net/archives/week_2007_01_28.html#006388&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;sock puppet&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; issues, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that Newsom has some <a href="http://junkyardblog.net/archives/week_2007_01_28.html#006388" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>sock puppet</strong></a> issues, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Skubinna</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-690586</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Skubinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/#comment-690586</guid>
		<description>Okay, the weather&#039;s nice.  And there are lots of great restaurants.  So it&#039;s not a total washout.

Just too many brainwashed Californians.  Who, next time they screw up their power grid again or run out of potable water, will be trying to rip off Washington and Oregon for ours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, the weather&#8217;s nice.  And there are lots of great restaurants.  So it&#8217;s not a total washout.</p>
<p>Just too many brainwashed Californians.  Who, next time they screw up their power grid again or run out of potable water, will be trying to rip off Washington and Oregon for ours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Skubinna</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-690583</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Skubinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/#comment-690583</guid>
		<description>Oh, and more stupid California lawmaker stunts - since I am down here for a while.

Some state legislators are introducing a bill making incandescent light bulbs illegal.  Yep, watch out for the light bulb cops busting down your door on a no knock warrant looking for Gaia hatin&#039; bulbs.

The course I&#039;m now in is across the bay so I get a rental car.  I saw a notice at the rental place that children under six weighing less than sixty pounds were required by law to be in a rear seat, in a state approved seat.  Really?  What if that&#039;s not the safest way?  Suppose you turn off the passenger side airbag and use a rear facing child seat in front?  Is that safe enough?

Not for California.  Because they know way more about everything than you do, so shut up stupid peasant.  And don&#039;t waste time researching it because The State says what you shall do!

The state PUC has announced that energy companies are not permitted to purchase electricity from coal burning plants.  Oh, how clean are these plants?  Doesn&#039;t matter, Thou Shalt Not.  Don&#039;t ask about plant emissions, we have decided for you.  Shut up and eat your gruel.  In the dark.

I am not only glad that I don&#039;t live here anymore, but don&#039;t understand how anyone else can stand it either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and more stupid California lawmaker stunts &#8211; since I am down here for a while.</p>
<p>Some state legislators are introducing a bill making incandescent light bulbs illegal.  Yep, watch out for the light bulb cops busting down your door on a no knock warrant looking for Gaia hatin&#8217; bulbs.</p>
<p>The course I&#8217;m now in is across the bay so I get a rental car.  I saw a notice at the rental place that children under six weighing less than sixty pounds were required by law to be in a rear seat, in a state approved seat.  Really?  What if that&#8217;s not the safest way?  Suppose you turn off the passenger side airbag and use a rear facing child seat in front?  Is that safe enough?</p>
<p>Not for California.  Because they know way more about everything than you do, so shut up stupid peasant.  And don&#8217;t waste time researching it because The State says what you shall do!</p>
<p>The state PUC has announced that energy companies are not permitted to purchase electricity from coal burning plants.  Oh, how clean are these plants?  Doesn&#8217;t matter, Thou Shalt Not.  Don&#8217;t ask about plant emissions, we have decided for you.  Shut up and eat your gruel.  In the dark.</p>
<p>I am not only glad that I don&#8217;t live here anymore, but don&#8217;t understand how anyone else can stand it either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Skubinna</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/comment-page-1/#comment-690576</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Skubinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/02/01/cali-dems-in-turmoil/#comment-690576</guid>
		<description>I saw this coming way back when the Dems got up on their high horse and declared they&#039;d be the mostest gosh darned ethicalest guys and gals ever, in the history of history itself!  You&#039;d have thought they&#039;d have learned from Clinton&#039;s performance, of all people.

Talk about writing checks you can&#039;t cash... but what does it matter, they rode the squeaky clean ethics bandwagon into power, so who cares how many fall off it or how soon?

Seems to me that if I were interested in being considered ethical (come to think of it, I guess I am) I&#039;d work on it by, you know, being ethical instead of yakking all the time about it.  Let other people draw their own conclusions from my behavior, I guess.  Not look like a blowhard.

But then, I think I&#039;d actually do ethical stuff, too.  Because otherwise, somebody might notice I was blowing smoke.  Good thing I&#039;m not a politician anyway - too much danger I&#039;d screw up and let my mouth say what my brain was thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this coming way back when the Dems got up on their high horse and declared they&#8217;d be the mostest gosh darned ethicalest guys and gals ever, in the history of history itself!  You&#8217;d have thought they&#8217;d have learned from Clinton&#8217;s performance, of all people.</p>
<p>Talk about writing checks you can&#8217;t cash&#8230; but what does it matter, they rode the squeaky clean ethics bandwagon into power, so who cares how many fall off it or how soon?</p>
<p>Seems to me that if I were interested in being considered ethical (come to think of it, I guess I am) I&#8217;d work on it by, you know, being ethical instead of yakking all the time about it.  Let other people draw their own conclusions from my behavior, I guess.  Not look like a blowhard.</p>
<p>But then, I think I&#8217;d actually do ethical stuff, too.  Because otherwise, somebody might notice I was blowing smoke.  Good thing I&#8217;m not a politician anyway &#8211; too much danger I&#8217;d screw up and let my mouth say what my brain was thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
