Apparently the so-called ‘animal rights activists’ caught flak from nearly everyone – including the Green Party – for this idiotic position, so they’re now into damage control mode:

He explained that though he thought it was wrong of the zoo to have saved the cub’s life, now that the bear can live on his own, it would be equally wrong to kill him.

Big of him, isn’t it? I still think NC Cop’s idea is a great one – set him loose among the Arctic polar bears and let him interview them for their views on the subject.

LINK

Nature may be red in tooth and claw, but mankind need not be.

I am guessing no one asked the little polar bear cub if it particularly minded being human raised in captivity.

Jerks.  What hypocrites.  To protect it, it must die?  This is how we protect animals?

The abandoned cub who fa…

Yep,Tom TB, they do.

Tonight I enjoyed deeelicious deer chili. Made it the simple Caroll Shelby way.

Yummo!!!

OK, exactly who appointed this elitist clown the arbiter of what constitutes a ‘proper polar bear’??

I’m not sure GWR, but I propose we take up a collection to send him north to interview real live Polar Bears in the wild to find out what they have to say?

Who’s with me?!?!?

What was it that these morons were bottle fed by their keepers, because they’re certainly fixated on something other than a normal lucid thought process?

As opposed to the animal kingdom, these nitwits have rejected nearly every form of common sense known to mankind and cling to the *inability to reason*, as though it was the last life jacket on the Titanic.

If only we knew under which melting rock these brain dead carbon units spawned………we could redeploy them here: LINK

Bingo, that’s exactly the same attitude as shown by the idiots who want to kill this bear cub. Ever wonder why, if PETA is so fond of animals, that they’d euthanize hundreds of them instead of trying to find them homes as they promised to do? It’s because in the eyes of these eco-terrorist freaks, pets and domesticated animals are guilty of “collaboration” with mankind, and/or are so contaminated that their “animalness” is compromised, so they have to die. It’s a disgusting, twisted, vile group of people who can rationalize things like this. Just as people who torture animals often graduate to doing the same to humans, so too is it a small step from things like this to shoving people into ovens if they don’t agree with you.

“It is not correct to bottle-feed a small polar bear. He will always be fixated on his keeper and will never grow to be a proper polar bear.” Knut, he argues, should have been killed when Tosca rejected him. “One should have had the courage to kill him much earlier.”

OK, exactly who appointed this elitist clown the arbiter of what constitutes a ‘proper polar bear’?? Did it ever occur to him that the bear is in a zoo, not out in the wild? It’s going to be dependent on the keepers for food and everything else for the rest of its life.

Or maybe the moonbats want to consider this an interference with the “right to choose” of the mother of this poor cub. After all, she did try to kill it.

Also contained in this post is the following info:

Gore’s film ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ has been called “science fiction” in a new paper prepared for Congress. “Al Gore put global warming on the map,” said Marlo Lewis, senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, at a Capitol Hill press conference on Friday. He called “An Inconvenient Truth” the “most politically influencing documentary.”

But Lewis added: “Nearly every significant statement that Vice President Gore makes regarding climate science and climate policy is either one-sided, misleading, exaggerated, speculative or wrong.” Lewis outlines these arguments in a 140-page congressional working paper released Friday, ahead of Gore’s trip to Washington, D.C., to provide congressional testimony on global warming.