What surprises me is many that claim this don’t see through this obvious falsehood.

With Irans inflammatory statements about ‘wiping Israel off the map’ (which I find funny, since doesn’t that just legitimize Israel then? They just admitted Israel is on the ‘map’), and other statements mixed with their Nuclear ambitions, seems obvious, especially when they are enriching the uranium.

Also, for those who are still being bamboozled by this Iranian president (hostage taker / terrorist / terrorist support), if it is only for peaceful purposes and only for power they want nuclear technology, why are they constantly throwing it out to the media, constantly telling people how close they are to achieving their goals?

The question is, when Iran finally does have nuclear capability, what are people going to do when he has that to threaten people with?

What will people do when he says leave here, or there, or get out of Iraq, or all Americans need to leave the middle east or face the consequences – when those consequences can or will include a nuclear bomb?

I know what the democrats will do though – they will blame the president (Bush) and say it is all his fault. They will say he didn’t strike at Iran when he should have, ect.

It is easy to armchair quarterback a situation when you already know the consequences and what happened already. Hindsite is 20/20, but dealing with it in the present before you know the consequences is alot harder than what democrats seem to do – talk about what ‘they’ would have done, after the problem is already known and the consequences that has already ocurred.

Oh well, since they released those 15 British sailors I’m sure they will negotiate on this.

After the distraction of a little British kidnapping, it seems we’ve moved closer to a very scary scenario:Iran on Monday announced that it has begun enriching uranium with 3,000 centrifuges, dramatically expanding a program that the United Nations ha…

Best be prepared.