Comments on: John Edwards: Putting the “man” in manicure?

By: Lorica

Lorica — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:57:37 +0000

I guess many Iowans think John Edwards was over charged by 380.00 for his haircut. I have to admit the last time I had my hair cut it cost 14.00, and I have a ton of curls that the poor girl has to work thru.

From my Hometown paper:

http://www.qctimes.com/articles/2007/04/19//news/local/doc4626f3bd6f2f2920813459.txt

By: benning

benning — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:45:03 +0000

I use a handheld mirror, the mirror over the sink, and a pair of scissors! ‘Course I haven’t a full head of hair anymore, but still …

Gawrsh, ain’t thet Edwards a purty feller, though?

By: camojack

camojack — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:04:03 +0000

To my way of thinking, the term “man” gets misused…a lot.

Whereas some would say an X-Y chromosome pairing qualifies, I think it’s an honorific; much what Will Rogers actually meant when he said he “never met a man he didn’t like”.

Not just male, man.

I don’t believe Edwards qualifies…

By: forest hunter

forest hunter — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:50:54 +0000

….and the fun in dysfunctional!

By: Bob Leibowitz

Bob Leibowitz — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:38:12 +0000

It’s one thing to pay $400 for a haircut.

It’s another thing entirely to use other people’s money to pay for it.
It’s the third strike when you do it in such a way that the whole world will know about 1 and 2.

The man has proven himself too damn dumb to be President!

By: American Bald (not by choice) eagle

American Bald (not by choice) eagle — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:38:58 +0000

Well, think of it this way: That’s over $1275 that the DNC does not have anymore to spend on campaign ads. That’s fine with me; the less the Democrats have to spend on lise the better.

Of course, most of the time I feel like all the campaign ads are lies, all of them.