Comments on: USSC upholds ban on partial birth abortion (MORE: EDWARDS CARES ABOUT PBA NOW, BUT NOT IN 2003)

By: Sister Toldjah » Dems set to pander in tonight’s South Carolina debate (LIVEBLOGGING)

Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:15:20 +0000

[...] Update 10: Williams is questioning Edwards on abortion, specifically PBA. Thinks the Justices were being activist in their decision on PBA. [...]

By: thecause

thecause — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 05:08:05 +0000

Abortion is not a civil right. It is not a Constitutional right. In fact, our founding document, the Declaration of Independence, lists our “right to life” first among our “unalienable” or God-given rights. The liberal Supreme Court in 1973 knew exactly what it was doing when it decided in favor of Roe, making abortion legal in all fifty states. The liberal justices knew they were circumventing the Constitution which grants all powers to the states which are not expressly given to the federal government in the Constitution. I really hate it when people say something is a “civil right” or a “Constitutional right” when it is nothing of the kind. These people obviously have not read the Constitution. Like Rudy Guiliani who recently said that abortion is a “Constitutional right”. Excuse me, Mr. Guiliani, but you betray your ignorance by that statement. Abortion was granted by the Supreme Court, not by the Constitution or by Congress, which actually makes abortion UN-Constitutional because the Supreme Court is not granted power to make law by our Constitution. Only Congress can make law. Roe v Wade MUST be overturned just based on that alone! The end.

By: Lorica

Lorica — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:45:46 +0000

OMG Could Tommy be Hillary Clinton?? I found this quote on Hillary’s Presidential website.

It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights

Drudge had a link to her statement. I wouldn’t want to link to her site from here. – Lorica

By: Pirate’s Cove » >>Americans Never Quit » Blog Archive » Supreme Court Upholds Ban On Partial Birth Abortions

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:03:33 +0000

[...] Sister Toldjah includes My Little Silk Pony statement [...]

By: TedintheShed

TedintheShed — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:09:11 +0000

The Iraq war and the economy aside, the appointment of those justices is Bush’s true legacy.

By: Dana

Dana — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:54:53 +0000

I do wonder what would happen if we took every pro-”choice” person in America, and put them in the place of the nurse described in the National Review article our wonderful hostess linked, to watch just one “intact dilation and extraction.”

By: Dana

Dana — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:52:25 +0000

One of my (few) frequent commenters continually tries to change the term to the antiseptic medical “intact dilation and extraction.” I guess it doesn’t sound quite so gruesome that way.

By: Webloggin

Webloggin — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:42:47 +0000

Supreme Court Upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban

n doing so the court also considered the government’s interest in protecting the rights of an unborn child. It is in this light that the abortion rights activists get the largest strike against them.

…

By: Lorica

Lorica — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:22:41 +0000

This is a great day in America. How this is a restriction of Tommy’s rights I can’t tell you. Tommy, you can’t have children so this has almost nothing to do with you. This is a child not a choice. Sanity has described the procedure so I don’t have to, but it is a horrible, horrible thing.

jpe again you show just how extremely left you are, to consider Justice Kennedy a conservative is like tell us Imus was a conservative. Come back to the middle abit would ya. You might gain some perspective. – Lorica

By: Norto

Norto — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:09:52 +0000

Actually, this procedure is gruesome, but dismemberment is NOT covered and still can be used. need a visual? It is all about voting blocks, imagine people of education or Christians, even thinking this is acceptable!?

By: The Sandbox

The Sandbox — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:33:03 +0000

Supreme Court Upholds Partial-Birth Abortion Ban

Uh oh, this one could get ugly soon:The Supreme Court upheld the nationwide ban on a controversial abortion procedure Wednesday, handing abortion opponents the long-awaited victory they expected from a more conservative bench. The 5-4 ruling said the P…

By: sanity

sanity — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:12:59 +0000

No Sev, it’s not “near-term”, they are actually doing a partial birth.

“A procedure where a doctor partially delivers a child’s body until only the head remains inside the womb, then punctures the back of the child’s skull with a sharp instrument, and sucks the child’s brains out before completing delivery of the now-dead infant.”

So, if it the baby is partially delivered, is it then a baby in their eyes, or still a fetus just because the doctor left the head still in?

I know the answer to it, just rhetorical, because people who support this monstrous procedure will never want their names to be associated with killing an actual baby….

By: sanity

sanity — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:08:10 +0000

I am sorry, tommy, but WHERE in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights does it say you are allowed to do this?

Personally I think the founding fathers would be completely disgusted with what is allowed.

Before you run off tommy, do you realize WHAT Partial Birth Abortion actually is?

It is a gruesome and disgusting procedure and I am outraged that it is even considered.

People whine and complain about torture of terrorists, and yet complain about THIS “procedure” being banned.

You want partial birth abortions, I suggest you sit through one and WATCH it from start to finish and see if you have the same damn opinion.

Same goes for any that this procedure legalized and those USSC voting for it, I say they sit down and watch the procedure too, and after they finish hurling their lunches, perhaps they may want to rethink thier position on it.

By: Severian

Severian — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:03:53 +0000

No tommy, a disgraceful day in American judicial history was when they ruled that states can take away your property, as in Kelo. Stopping people from murdering near term babies is not disgraceful.

By: Leslie

Leslie — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:57:00 +0000

I refuse to play partisan games. The procedure banned is gruesome. ‘Nuff said.