Comments on: The next DOJ scandal http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/29/the-next-doj-scandal/ Don't dis or dismiss this miss! Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: The Sundries Shack http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/29/the-next-doj-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-709992 The Sundries Shack Wed, 30 May 2007 06:04:32 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/29/the-next-doj-scandal/#comment-709992 <strong>It’s Only Shocking if You’re Not that Bright.</strong> I am still trying to figure out why this story is news at all. WASHINGTON, May 23 — A former top Justice Department aide testified on Wednesday that she had "crossed the line" in considering the political beliefs of applicants for nonpartisan le... It’s Only Shocking if You’re Not that Bright.

I am still trying to figure out why this story is news at all.

WASHINGTON, May 23 — A former top Justice Department aide testified on Wednesday that she had “crossed the line” in considering the political beliefs of applicants for nonpartisan le…

]]> By: Great White Rat http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/29/the-next-doj-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-709987 Great White Rat Wed, 30 May 2007 02:59:45 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/29/the-next-doj-scandal/#comment-709987 ST headlines this: <blockquote>The next DOJ scandal </blockquote> Nah, no scandal. It'll be ignored. Nothing to see here, move along. The corruption and politicizing of the DOJ under Clinton was well known, so this will just be dismissed as "old news" - if it gets mentioned at all. ST headlines this:

The next DOJ scandal

Nah, no scandal. It’ll be ignored. Nothing to see here, move along. The corruption and politicizing of the DOJ under Clinton was well known, so this will just be dismissed as “old news” – if it gets mentioned at all.

]]> By: Drewsmom http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/29/the-next-doj-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-709978 Drewsmom Wed, 30 May 2007 01:54:03 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/05/29/the-next-doj-scandal/#comment-709978 Well, well, well.:-w Well, well, well.:-w

]]>