Comments on: Breaking: NY mayor Mike Bloomberg is “leaving” the GOP

By: Great White Rat

Great White Rat — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:45:08 +0000

Bloomberg’s another nanny-state liberal who thinks the government should tell you what to do in nearly every aspect of your life – what to eat, what to drive, where to live, what you’re allowed to say or think. That means he will be perfectly at home in the Democrat party. Good riddance.

Prediction: he will get some face time in prime time at the Dem convention in 2008, unless he’s decided on an independent run for the White House by then.

By: Gerry Shuller

Gerry Shuller — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:08:01 +0000

I’m soooo devastatated by losing another RINO

By: PCD

PCD — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:11:57 +0000

The GOP has never run anyone out of the party like the Dems do. If there were and actual membership secretary, I’d like to be it. People like Bloomberg, who couldn’t buy the party, and David Duke would not be able to call themselves a Republican, nor would Lincoln Chaffee.

Actually, Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, and Chuck Hagel would be getting a warning before I revoked their membership.

By: Lorica

Lorica — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:31:51 +0000

Yes let’s remember how devastated the GOP was when Lincoln Chafee lost his election. Then after he lost he came out and said he was thinking about switching parties as he has more in common with the Dem party. It is time for the people who vote with the Dem party to become Dems. Good Lord I just wish the GOP would get off their butts and start seriously looking at these people who call themselves “Republican”, and if they don’t meet the standard of over half the party platform to tell them to take a hike.

A few of weeks ago, the GOP called me for a donation. I told them that if this immagration bill goes thru I will stop giving to the Republican party until it figures out that it isn’t the illegal aliens they are asking for funding from.

As far as Bloomberg goes, I was shocked to find out he was a Rep, and I could really care less that he left the party. Just another RINO who needs to go to the Dem party. God Speed Mr. Bloomberg. – Lorica

By: NC Cop

NC Cop — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:29:53 +0000

That’s a great comment lee. Considering Bloomberg was a democrat then a Republican then an independent. Was the democratic party sad to see him go?

As far as Lieberman, they ran him out of the party when he exercised a little bit of thought on his own against the party doctrine. That says a lot, doesn’t it?

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:34:42 +0000

Riiiight Bloomberg was “never” a Republican so the GOP won’t feel sad about him leaving.

Indeed, they won’t.

Sure no sour grapes there.

Indeed, there aren’t. The sooner RINO Republicans leave the party, the better, as far as I’m concerned.

Next?

By: lee

lee — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:28:48 +0000

“Bloomberg left the party a long time ago. In fact, I’m not ever sure if he truly was a part of it”

Riiiight Bloomberg was “never” a Republican so the GOP won’t feel sad about him leaving.

Sure no sour grapes there.

Don’t be sad though after all you still have the “independent” Joe Lieberman on your side.

By: Tom TB

Tom TB — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:18:51 +0000

I echo the other posters here; Bloomberg never was Republican, he changed parties so he couldn’t lose in the primary. There’s a 5 to 1 ratio in NYC of Dems to Reps, and all he had to do was out-spend Herman Badillo.

By: CZ

CZ — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 02:40:16 +0000

“The Bloomberg Story”

Yeeeawwwwnnnnnnnn….’scuse me. Which way is the wind in midtown Manhattan blowing today?

With an ego as big as his wallet, this clown can only syphon off liberal democrat MSM attention. And that’s a good thing. Am I wrong?

And what exactly is an independent? Those who are truly fed up with the two party system or those who want to make a one-time election ’statement’ and waste their precious vote? My guess is that an independent is one who would most likely not be voting anyway.

Look, I did the same with John Anderson in 1980. And what a mistake I made.

By: Bloomberg Switches … Again at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.

Wed, 20 Jun 2007 02:32:43 +0000

[...] Mark Tapscott explains the reference, while Michelle Malkin and Sister Toldjah yawn. (via Instapundit) [...]

By: Captain's Quarters

Captain's Quarters — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 02:21:59 +0000

Bloomberg Switches … Again

Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire mayor of New York City, announced that he would no longer remain a Republican. This comes six years after he announced that he would no longer remain a Democrat in order to run as Rudy Giuliani’s…

By: Gwen

Gwen — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:47:28 +0000

The link to The Bloomberg Story is LINK

By: Gwen

Gwen — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:46:06 +0000

Which leaves the question, what’s in it for independent voters? How do we structure our organizing to so that the candidates, including and esepcially Bloomberg (given his history with independents) related to independents on our terms – e.g. showing they’re more concerned about changing America and transforming the political process than getting elected.

For more on the history of independents and Bloomberg (I agree with you that Bloomberg was never a traditional party man), read The Bloomberg Story (by Jacqueline Salit who ran his independent campaign in New York)

By: Leslie

Leslie — Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:17:29 +0000

ST: This only makes it â€˜official.’ Bloomberg left the party a long time ago. In fact, I’m not ever sure if he truly was a part of it.

No, he never truly was. He was a lifelong Democrat who ran for mayor as a Republican, because he couldn’t have got the nomination from the braindead NYC Democratic Party.

ST: Will Chuck Hagel be next, to complete a future â€˜Independent’ presidential ticket?

Almost certainly.