All about life, liberty and the pursuit of hopeiness.
| CBS News | 0 | |
| WaPo | 0 | |
| Zogby | North Dakota Senator Byron Dorgan Trails in Potential 2010 Senate Match-up |
0 |
| SF Chron | 0 | |
| KDVR | 0 |
Audacity of Truth
Big Government- Hot Air
- Michelle Malkin
- Wheeling & dealing: Snowe pow-wows with Obama; Landrieu, Schumer, Daschle behind the scenes
- Saturday in the Senate: Cash for Cloture; Reid gets 60; Update: 8:15pm Eastern cloture vote – 60-39; Voinovich absent; Dems invoke Teddy Kennedy; Reid: “Ted would be happy.”
- Another day, another Berkeley tantrum
- Jake Tapper
- Lynn Sweet
Blogads
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of ST's advertisers, nor do their opinions necessarily reflect ST's. Stats
That’s what he gets for endorsing Hillary….
So how does that statement square with those who have done that very thing in examples such as those who went to the ME prior to and since the Long War began?
I agree with this statement competely. I just can’t believe the guy that is actually politicizing intelligence is making it. What a lowlife puke. – Lorica
They sued the Bush Administration, but shouldn’t the suit have been specific and named only Armitage, since he was admittedly the one that ‘leaked’ the information….but was never charged with a crime.
When is Fitzgerald going to go after Joe Wilson for lieing about who sent him to Niger or any of the other lies he has told? See the link.
LINK
I mean really. We all know who the leaker is. Richard Armitage. It’s been stated 20 million times. We all know who the liar is. Joe Wilson. It’s been stated 20 million times that he lied about who sent him to Niger.
This all goes back to the dems losing by 500 votes in Florida. It’s likely that the butterfly ballot cost them 500 votes. But again, who designed the butterfly ballot. The dems. They have been frothing at the mouth ever since 2000, and continue to froth.
Sanity says:
They sued the Bush Administration, but shouldn’t the suit have been specific and named only Armitage, since he was admittedly the one that ‘leaked’ the information….but was never charged with a crime.
You’d be right if the purpose of the suit was to correct some possible wrong Plame suffered by having her so-called cover blown. That would be the common sense thing to do and most people would approach it that way.
But that wasn’t what Plame and Lyin’ Joe had in mind. This suit was devoid of any serious content; instead, it was filed only as a rather pathetic attempt to embarrass the administration. Thank God the judge in this case looked at the law instead of engaging in some leftist judicial activism.
A little off topic, but definitely related to the War on Terror (you remember, that little “bumper sticker” thing, at least according to John Edwards):
House Dems eliminate “John Doe” protection
This was the amendment passed about 4 months ago with bipartisan support that protected citizens from being sued for reporting suspicious behavior that suggested a planned terrorist attack. It was passed as a result of the incident of the 6 imams who were tossed off a plane at MSP after unusual behavior that presaged a terrorist strike. Their response, of course, was to sue the passengers who reported the actions.
So Pelosi and her ilk have now decided that if you were to see Osama bin Laden himself personally distributing plans to launch new attacks, you should not report it, because later Osama – or more likely, an attorney hired by CAIR or the ACLU – would be allowed to sue you.
As if we needed any more evidence that the leftists in this country cannot be trusted with national security…
Now GWR – you know the old saying: Don’t question the Democrats’ patriotism – they will question yours instead.
So……….what’s next after the lawsuit goes down in Plames? Sue the judge who made the decision?
Never fear folks, valerie is gonna appeal, what a MEDIA WHORE THIS BROAD IS. !!!!!