Shouldn’t we let them come here?

Sure we should. Your point??

I don’t recall any push here for Iraqis to be repatriated in America.

Please link to your most recent post urging asylum.

Sure jpe, here you go. Enjoy.

Want to help and Iraqi man immigrate to the U.S.?

Thanks in advance!

No problem at all, my friend. Let me know if you need anything else.

“CIF moderators, can I call Neil a wanker without getting banned[?] I do feel it’s justified here.”

“Normally trolls post in comment threads. Here, the actual blog post is a work of trollism.”

“This piece has blatantly treasonable implications.”

My favorite:

“[Neil] is obviously one of these lefties whose ‘passion’ blinds him; clearly a socialist who only believes in selective altruism.”

As opposed to…?

Please link to your most recent post urging asylum. Thanks in advance!

Weren’t we told five years ago by the same pro-war bloggers that the Iraqi people were simply baying for a US/UK invasion, and that the “liberators” would be greeted with bouquets of flowers and cucumber sandwiches?

This guy is completely idiotic. If Ireland was sending people and munitions into Britain what would Britain do exactly?? Ohhh that’s right, they sent troops into Ireland to stop that sort of garbage. I love how the same doesn’t apply here. Since we know beyond a shadow of a doubt that Iran is sending equipment and training terrorists to harm the people of Iraq, and our soldiers, maybe the Brits need to re-think the idea of leaving and just attack Iran like they did Ireland. – Lorica

In that conflict, Britain was responding to an illegal act of aggression by Argentina

Ah, I see. Because attempting to assassinate a U.S. President, financing suicide bombers in Israel, ignoring U.N. resolutions on WMD and terrorism, and the launching of an illegal war of aggression against a sovereign state doesnt mean anything. 4 sovereign states to be exact, but I guess that doesn’t count in Clark’s book.

Since I’m not a Brit, I’ll translate the question to an American context. If the USA were ruled by a vicious fascist dictatorship like that of Saddam Hussein–and if a liberation force was sent by another country (India, say, or a coalition of Britain, Canada, and Australia) with the intent of reestablishing democracy here (as well as pursuing its own economic interests) then should Americans support the invaders, or join the “resistance movement” which is attempting to re-create the dictatorship by committing atrocities agaist civilians as well as the invading troops?

I’d be on the side of the invaders.

But in Iraq, it was Britain that was the aggressor, and all those who aided the occupation are
complicit in what the Nuremburg judgment laid down as “the supreme international crime”: the launching of an illegal war of aggression against a sovereign state

The obligatory Nazi reference of course. What an idiot.