Comments on: Research fraud within the IPCC? And other ‘global warming’ news

By: Leaning Straight Up

Leaning Straight Up — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 07:25:08 +0000

Global Warming: Figures don’t lie, but liars can figure…

One of the biggest problems the GW alarmists have is showing proof of there assertions and theories. They parade their data, their climate models, their charts and graphs. The problem is that more and more evidence is surfacing thats fairly…

By: Sister Toldjah

Sister Toldjah — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:52:21 +0000

I blogged about that here, Bak

By: Baklava

Baklava — Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:37:41 +0000

This new Newsweek piece takes Newsweek itself to task for it's global warming denier piece last week.

By: Steve Skubinna

Steve Skubinna — Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:10:53 +0000

Oh, that Garret is a hoot, all right. Hunh hunh snert snort. Does he have a clue that buried in his snark is the salient point the MPs are addressing, to wit: planets with no humans on them are warming, so perhaps something other than humans can cause climate change?

Assuming the climate is changing, and in the direction the doomsters are pointing. And please don’t try obfuscating with data, nobody here is stupid enough to be lead astray by facts. Damn it, this is Truth with a capital “T” we’re talking about here, not some outdated artifact of the white patriarchy.

By: Neocon News

Neocon News — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:04:13 +0000

Did Al Gore use his “internet” to hack NASA and increase Global Warming™?

The Five Stages of Grief revisited by Albert Gore Jr. in the face of his 2000 presidential defeat. Now he is the Prophet of Doom for the super scary cause of Global Warming; some of his duties include hanging out with vapid celebrities and lecturing t…

By: Neocon News » Did Al Gore use his "internet" to hack NASA and increase Global Warmingâ„¢?

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:03:28 +0000

[...] Hat Tip to Sister Toldjah for bringing today’s second barrel blast of criticism toward Global Warming to my attention. [...]

By: Walter E. Wallis

Walter E. Wallis — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:49:27 +0000

As someone whose job, 50 years ago, included operating the weather station in Trona, California, I can attest that those numbers are perfectly satisfactory for determinint that, at that station at that time, that was the reading.
As soon as you start applying correction factors to those readings they become guesses, and researchers can be excused if their guesses are in the direction of validating their job.