<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Several more reasons not to trust the MSM (MORE: MSNBC NEWSROOM BOOED PREZ&#8217;S 2003 SOTU)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Great White Rat</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/comment-page-1/#comment-716346</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/#comment-716346</guid>
		<description>jpe protests too much:

&lt;blockquote&gt;That&#039;s an entirely different thing from whether their reporting is biased, however. The former is, at best, weak indirect evidence of the latter. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh please....let&#039;s start with three words:  fake but accurate.  Let&#039;s move ahead to photoshopped &quot;news&quot; pictures from there.  And the popular game of &quot;guess the party&quot;, where a story about a Democrat caught or convicted of some crime never seems to mention the party affiliation.  According to you, it&#039;s all purely an accident that this type of thing slants solidly left.  If you really mean that, you really need to pay attention more.  If you don&#039;t, your reasons for standing up for &#039;your side&#039;, meaning the leftist MSM, are obvious.

You want a catalog of media bias?  Try &lt;a href=&quot;http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/category/media-watch/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;this&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - entry after entry of evidence, with links to the actual stories.  Please disprove intent in these cases.  We&#039;ll expect a full report in the morning.

Basically, you&#039;re asking us to believe that the MSM leftists will check their bias at the door when they sit down in front of their keyboards.  Only a fool would do that.

By analogy, let&#039;s look at this another way:  let&#039;s say you are a black man charged with a capital offense.  Would you be willing to let the jury be composed entirely of KKK members, if they just promised they could be objective?

If your answer is no, you&#039;re a hypocrite, because you think conservatives should face a leftist media &quot;jury&quot; every day and not suspect bias.

If your answer is yes, you&#039;re an idiot, for obvious reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jpe protests too much:</p>
<blockquote><p>That&#8217;s an entirely different thing from whether their reporting is biased, however. The former is, at best, weak indirect evidence of the latter.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh please&#8230;.let&#8217;s start with three words:  fake but accurate.  Let&#8217;s move ahead to photoshopped &#8220;news&#8221; pictures from there.  And the popular game of &#8220;guess the party&#8221;, where a story about a Democrat caught or convicted of some crime never seems to mention the party affiliation.  According to you, it&#8217;s all purely an accident that this type of thing slants solidly left.  If you really mean that, you really need to pay attention more.  If you don&#8217;t, your reasons for standing up for &#8216;your side&#8217;, meaning the leftist MSM, are obvious.</p>
<p>You want a catalog of media bias?  Try <a href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/category/media-watch/" rel="nofollow"><strong>this</strong></a> &#8211; entry after entry of evidence, with links to the actual stories.  Please disprove intent in these cases.  We&#8217;ll expect a full report in the morning.</p>
<p>Basically, you&#8217;re asking us to believe that the MSM leftists will check their bias at the door when they sit down in front of their keyboards.  Only a fool would do that.</p>
<p>By analogy, let&#8217;s look at this another way:  let&#8217;s say you are a black man charged with a capital offense.  Would you be willing to let the jury be composed entirely of KKK members, if they just promised they could be objective?</p>
<p>If your answer is no, you&#8217;re a hypocrite, because you think conservatives should face a leftist media &#8220;jury&#8221; every day and not suspect bias.</p>
<p>If your answer is yes, you&#8217;re an idiot, for obvious reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/comment-page-1/#comment-716345</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/#comment-716345</guid>
		<description>jpe, the denial of the bias is proof in and of itself.  You are so inured of the liberal bias that you can not see it, but you love to wallow in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jpe, the denial of the bias is proof in and of itself.  You are so inured of the liberal bias that you can not see it, but you love to wallow in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/comment-page-1/#comment-716341</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/#comment-716341</guid>
		<description>jpe, It may not be &quot;biased&quot; but there are certainly FALSE claims.

You can have your &quot;biased&quot; point temporarily... 

I can make a list of 100 false stories right here off of memory...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jpe, It may not be &#8220;biased&#8221; but there are certainly FALSE claims.</p>
<p>You can have your &#8220;biased&#8221; point temporarily&#8230; </p>
<p>I can make a list of 100 false stories right here off of memory&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpe</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/comment-page-1/#comment-716327</link>
		<dc:creator>jpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/#comment-716327</guid>
		<description>You have convincingly argued that MSM journalists are predominantly liberal.  That&#039;s an entirely different thing from whether their reporting is biased, however.  The former is, at best, weak indirect evidence of the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have convincingly argued that MSM journalists are predominantly liberal.  That&#8217;s an entirely different thing from whether their reporting is biased, however.  The former is, at best, weak indirect evidence of the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/comment-page-1/#comment-716319</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/#comment-716319</guid>
		<description>I think the MSM is out to make a buck, plain and simple, and they have an agenda as well. I do not trust them. I do watch FOX when Brit Hume is on, but I have to admit that some of FOX wears thin. For instance, I think people like Michelle Malkin have hurt their credibility. I have gotten to the place where I do not watch people like Tucker or Olberman or Hannity. I do not listen to talk radio and I think a lot of these people are completely self serving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the MSM is out to make a buck, plain and simple, and they have an agenda as well. I do not trust them. I do watch FOX when Brit Hume is on, but I have to admit that some of FOX wears thin. For instance, I think people like Michelle Malkin have hurt their credibility. I have gotten to the place where I do not watch people like Tucker or Olberman or Hannity. I do not listen to talk radio and I think a lot of these people are completely self serving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewsmom</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/comment-page-1/#comment-716316</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewsmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/15/several-more-reasons-not-to-trust-the-msm/#comment-716316</guid>
		<description>I simply can&#039;t beleive anyone would fall for this fake stuff, its simply amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply can&#8217;t beleive anyone would fall for this fake stuff, its simply amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
