<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pajamas Media: How TNR got &#8220;suckered&#8221; by Scott Thomas Beauchamp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/20/pajamas-media-how-tnr-got-suckered-by-scott-thomas-beauchamp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/20/pajamas-media-how-tnr-got-suckered-by-scott-thomas-beauchamp/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Skubinna</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/20/pajamas-media-how-tnr-got-suckered-by-scott-thomas-beauchamp/comment-page-1/#comment-717051</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Skubinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/20/pajamas-media-how-tnr-got-suckered-by-scott-thomas-beauchamp/#comment-717051</guid>
		<description>This is another of the &quot;The narrative is right, we just got the facts wrong&quot; arguments.  As if facts are irrelevant, nothing more than styling accessories.

My own take on the Rather/Mapes story is still valid, I think:  &quot;Just because we&#039;re lying is no reason not to believe us!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another of the &#8220;The narrative is right, we just got the facts wrong&#8221; arguments.  As if facts are irrelevant, nothing more than styling accessories.</p>
<p>My own take on the Rather/Mapes story is still valid, I think:  &#8220;Just because we&#8217;re lying is no reason not to believe us!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveinboca</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/20/pajamas-media-how-tnr-got-suckered-by-scott-thomas-beauchamp/comment-page-1/#comment-716735</link>
		<dc:creator>daveinboca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/20/pajamas-media-how-tnr-got-suckered-by-scott-thomas-beauchamp/#comment-716735</guid>
		<description>One commenter to Confederate Yankee came up with this egregious solecism:

&quot;Yes, Beauchamp&#039;s articles may contain some untruths. They might be total fiction. But it doesn&#039;t matter, does it?&quot;

Is it just me or doesn&#039;t that sound like Evan Thomas&#039; lame excuse for Newsweak when the Duke Lacrosse stripper-lies surfaced?

&quot;The narrative was right, but the facts were wrong.&quot;

Sounds like the commenter was just the average CSJ graduate---cheating on his/her ethics exam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One commenter to Confederate Yankee came up with this egregious solecism:</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes, Beauchamp&#8217;s articles may contain some untruths. They might be total fiction. But it doesn&#8217;t matter, does it?&#8221;</p>
<p>Is it just me or doesn&#8217;t that sound like Evan Thomas&#8217; lame excuse for Newsweak when the Duke Lacrosse stripper-lies surfaced?</p>
<p>&#8220;The narrative was right, but the facts were wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds like the commenter was just the average CSJ graduate&#8212;cheating on his/her ethics exam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great White Rat</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/20/pajamas-media-how-tnr-got-suckered-by-scott-thomas-beauchamp/comment-page-1/#comment-716723</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/08/20/pajamas-media-how-tnr-got-suckered-by-scott-thomas-beauchamp/#comment-716723</guid>
		<description>Hoven&#039;s got one great list there...a handy reference the next time a leftists tries to claim there&#039;s no media bias, like one who trolled in here a few days ago.

I&#039;d add one right away to his list:  CNN&#039;s Peter Arnett, making up the quote that &quot;We had to destroy the village to save it&quot; during the Vietnam war.  Apparently leftists haven&#039;t changed a bit since then - if the facts don&#039;t match your politics, make up new &quot;facts&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoven&#8217;s got one great list there&#8230;a handy reference the next time a leftists tries to claim there&#8217;s no media bias, like one who trolled in here a few days ago.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d add one right away to his list:  CNN&#8217;s Peter Arnett, making up the quote that &#8220;We had to destroy the village to save it&#8221; during the Vietnam war.  Apparently leftists haven&#8217;t changed a bit since then &#8211; if the facts don&#8217;t match your politics, make up new &#8220;facts&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
