Comments on: Sandy Berger is back … as one of Hillary Clinton’s top foreign policy advisors

By: mikem

mikem — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 06:37:53 +0000

It’s not so much the hypocrisy that angers me (and it does) as much as the fact that Hillary knows that our “non-liberal” MSM will let her get away with it.
That’s what drives me up the wall…the sure confidence that there will not be outraged editorials and talks of Berger’s records cleansing and silence being rewarded by the Clintons.

By: G-Monster

G-Monster — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:42:36 +0000

If Hillary’s campaign is in possesion of stolen ponzi scheme money, she should find the rightful owners of the money(the victims of the ponzi scheme) and give it back to them. she shouldn’t donating it to charity as it’s not hers to give.

By: TedintheShed

TedintheShed — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:16:06 +0000

Ahh yes…

sprinkling the water can of evolutionary dew upon the culture of corruption.

By: Lorica

Lorica — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:08:42 +0000

Waterboard Berger!

Is that a classified document in your pants or are you just glad to see me?

Waterboard Berger!

Waterboarding is too good for this traitor, just shoot him and be done with it. – Lorica

By: Lorica

Lorica — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:07:42 +0000

I hear the distant echo of this “individual” blah blah blahing about “the most ethical adminstration ever”. Well we know she lied to us then, and look the leopard hasn’t changed her spots!!! She continues to associate herself with criminals and traitors. Dear Lord this country will be go to hell like a speeding bullet if this idiot ever gets into power. – Lorica

By: Drewsmom

Drewsmom — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:17:52 +0000

Hope the other leftie candidates use this op to jump on her on this, but they don’t have the guts so we’ll just have to do it for them.
These people have stopped amazing me with the things they do and get away with the the help of the msm, spittin chrissie matthews and keith olbernut.
This latest news on hill’s pick needs to be top of our headlines — talk it to death, like the dimwit dems have done what they say is the
war for oil and 9/11 inside job thing, give em a big dose of their own stinky bad tasting medicine.

By: Neocon News

Neocon News — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:29:36 +0000

Sandy Berger will keep the documents flowing in Hillary’s Administration

If you wondered if Hillary Clinton was serious about conducting a war on terrorism, or if she learned anything substantive from the attacks of 9/11, you can rest easy. Those nights of sleepless questioning and wonder are over.
No, she hasn’t lear…

By: Common Sense Political Thought

Common Sense Political Thought — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:19:14 +0000

Hillary Clinton’s contempt for the voters.

I think it’s that Mrs Clinton just has so much utter contempt for her lessers (that would be us, the voters) that she thinks that what she does really doesn’t matter, that she’ll get away with it like she’s gotten away with eve…

By: Dana

Dana — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:31:54 +0000

It just seems to me that there’s more to this. Senatrix Clinton has plenty of money, and could bring on board anyone she wanted. With the Norman Hsu scandal breaking and broadening, you’d think that the last thing she’d want to do is bring aboard someone with Mr ~~Burglar’s~~ Berger’s record? It’s an unnecessary distraction, at the very least, and calls attention to the Clinton’s playing fast and loose with the law.

There is a large group of people out there who will simply never vote for Mrs Clinton; I’m guessing that people who read Sister Toldjah would be counted among them! With her high negatives, Mrs Clinton simply can’t throw away voters who are possibly reachable for her, but the Norman Hsu and now Sandy Berger incidents are just going to remind people of Whitewater and Johnny Chung and Charlie Trie. Why do this?

By: Severian

Severian — Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:26:35 +0000

Waterboard Berger!

Is that a classified document in your pants or are you just glad to see me?

Waterboard Berger!

By: sanity

sanity — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:28:02 +0000

So what will he have in his pants for Hillary….

errrr…that sounded bad.

So what will he shove down his pants for HIllary…

Hmm, no matter where he shoves things for Hillary, it just sounds so wrong…….

By: Big Bang Hunter

Big Bang Hunter — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:14:10 +0000

- So where is the surprise in either seeing the quid pro quo payback to Burgers efforts to cover Clintons ass by stealing, and destroying, the incriminating WOT/Bin Ladin memos, or the Lefts selective outrage that is all but non-existent if its anything bad about their beloved cult hero’s?

- They have become so predictable, even Al Qaeda’s speech writers are using their stuff.

- BBH –

By: NC Cop

NC Cop — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:06:38 +0000

So Hillary really is different than Bill!!!! Bill hired people that committed crimes during his administration. Hillary is avoiding the middle man and hiring people already convicted of crimes.

Gosh, how much better we would be under her.