Gore Lied And Millions Laughed

Global Warming. The Myth. The Man. The Double Standard Twit whose home uses up more electrons in a month than most will use in their…

He may well have overstated a bit, but that sure as heck does not amount to refutation of nor even a serious discount against his argument. The judge was careful, in fact, to make plain that his findings did not refute the film’s message.

I have NO idea why this has become a liberal/conservative dispute. Al Gore is obviously a political figure, but this particular episode in his career of environmentalism is clearly to be tested by science and the accumulation of evidence, not by political philosophy or contention.
Maybe it just ticks off many conservatives that an a Democrat might have gotten hold of a really, really, compelling issue, and is looking more right than not as time goes on.
Hey, it could happen. Face up to it.
More important, there really is an issue of great import here, and to argument-no matter how fierce–will not hold back the tide, as King Canute took such pains to teach us.

Gore is viewed as a joke on the right generally here. But that was the case among Independents and some on the left 7 years ago. That is no longer the case. Whether the right here believes he is a joke is irrelevent because he’s admired by independents now and of course on the left. In the rest of the world, he’s seen as a statesman.

Right now, it’s mostly just those on the right that tear apart his work on Global Warming. Yes, a judge finds errors in his film, but the judge points out the overall points of the film are correct and that’s really the story among the international media as well. If he were to get in the race, the mainstream media would start repeating right wing talking points about his work because they kind of have to if they’re going to cover the candidates’ words on both sides. His positions would be reduced to soundbytes and his work would be reduced to pure politics, when the reality is that there are serious environmental problems that he’s trying to tackle.

I would be surprised and dismayed if he entered, my dismay being both for his work being diminished and his lack of judgment on what it would do to his work.

So my prediction…he doesn’t enter.

Dan, too bad for global warming alarmists that that didn’t keep the judge from ruling that the film was politically partisan and didn’t need to be shown without a fact sheet accompanying it, eh? The judge is clear that if schools are going to educate about global warming, that it must be a balanced education, something Al Gore, on the other hand, does not favor.

Sister> Well, that’s as may be. I’m just pointing out that if we’re going to all say “Ah hah!” based on the judge pointing out things that are incorrect and use that as proof Gore and Global Warming are frauds, it should also be pointed out that the judge agreed with the film’s (and Gore’s) general points.

If we accept one as proof based on a judge, don’t we kind of have to accept the other? Or are we cherry picking from the ruling here to suit our own pre-determined views? From the original posting, it doesn’t look like you believe that Global Warming exists or that man has an impact at all, but I may just be misunderstanding.

As predicted by me since earlier this year, Al won the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in scaring the hell out of people about Global Warming while lining his pockets selling useless carbon credits.

That’s the reality of what happened, like it or …

Maybe it’s just me, but I’d say that those monks in Burma have already contributed more to the cause of world peace than this overstuffed, pompous fool of a former Vice President.

But I’m sure he’ll get the prize. After all, they just awarded the prize for literature to Doris Lessing, who’s been churning out unreadable novels since practically forever, because it was her turn, dammit.

As for the idiotic notion that Gore could ride the Nobel Prize to the presidential nomination, all I can say is I hope he tries. If he does, Hillary Clinton will impale him to the side of a barn, and we can all enjoy the hissing sound as the gasbag deflates.

Hopefully he will be the one to lead the hypocritical socialist greedbags to a well deserved slaughter. I just love a two-time lefty loser.

Bring it on!

When the children in public schools in the U.S. or the U.K. are shown the film,

1) Are they forced to watch it?

2) Do the schools have to pay for it?

3) Does Al Gore gain monetarily?

Gore won’t debate because he simply can’t refute most of the arguments against his one-sided movie.

It should only be shown in school with a warning label: This film is harmful to logical minds who base their conclusions on facts.

The oafs and imbeciles in Oslo keep dumbing down their brand until soon the Peace Prize will be just another politically fungible chit.

But, if Gore gets it he’ll just be beside himself with glee, the man exhibits all of the negative traits of a person suffering from full blown Narcissistic Personality Disorder, but the really sad thing is how many thoughtless and easily led sheeple mindlessly sign up to worship at the Goracle’s First Temple Of Global Warming.

1. Get everyone hyped up over global warming

Indeed, perhaps if the messiah would stop jetsetting around the world in his private jet using twice as much energy than the average U.S. citizen, it might be easier to take him more serious. If he’s so concerned about the impending “ecological disaster”, as you put it, perhaps he could lead by example. Doubtful….

Goracle’s flock of sheep will continue to follow him in a zombie like daze, threatening to destroy anyone who dares to question him.

To wit: ME