Comments on: Democrats owe an apology – to “Man-made” Global Warming

By: Steve Skubinna

Steve Skubinna — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 06:35:44 +0000

No, right, KEvron, it was Blackwater that set the fires. And it was your preposterous strawman that said it. Er, strawwoman.

Criminy, you clowns even lie about your own lies.

By: forest hunter

forest hunter — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:51:08 +0000

Which one of these geniuses are you KEvron?

By: KEvron

KEvron — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:26:54 +0000

“That might be funny if I didn’t expect some nutcase to seriously propose it”

alas, none did, so you may put your preposterous straw man to bed.

KEvron

By: Steve Skubinna

Steve Skubinna — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:20:41 +0000

Joe, you obviously haven’t been paying attention. Are you parodying left wing commnetary or something? Maybe you’ve missed where your compatriots wrestled to be first out the gate with denunciations of Bush’s policy toward’s GW as being responsible for the fires. So it turns out is isn’t, well, it doesn’t matter because Bush is still an evil poopyhead and we never had fires when Bill and Al were in charge.

Shifting goalposts again, bucko.

By: Great White Rat

Great White Rat — Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:56:47 +0000

Come on, NC Cop and Sev. Don’t you know that by wiping wildfires out we only create more wildfires? Just like terrorists, you know.

By: Severian

Severian — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:42:05 +0000

Just love the GW alarmist perspective. No mention of the fact that environmentalists and their restrictions on cutting and controlled burning produced the conditions that made the whole area a tinderbox. No mention of the fact that the California is dry as a result of below average temperatures in the Pacific ocean, resulting in less rainfall and drier conditions. No mention of explosive housing growth increasing the danger by locating houses in areas prone to fire.

But typical libs are quick to say the “just because a boy set it doesn’t prove it wasn’t GW!”

By: NC Cop

NC Cop — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:18:07 +0000

Great post, Kevin! Love that link!!!

However, I submit to you, and everyone else, that it was PRESIDENT BUSH HIMSELF who set the fire!! That’s right!! Notice how they will not release the name or age of the suspect! COVER UP!!!! COVER UP!!!

Isn’t it obvious that Bush was trying to burn all of California down because they’re all democrats! It’s all part of the vast right wing conspiracy!!!

That might be funny if I didn’t expect some nutcase to seriously propose it.

By: JoeCitizen

JoeCitizen — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:14:29 +0000

Is this a parody of a right-wing post or something?

I mean, Hello…

Not saying that global warming was a factor here, but if it was, no one would ever claim that is caused the fire TO START. Fires start all the time, through lightning strikes, for instance. Arsonists seem to be at work on a regular basis, and even simple house fires, they happen all the time. If GW were a factor, it would cause a small local fire To SPREAD, disasterously, because the climate would be such as to establish the proper conditions for it to spread.

So how on earth do you think that finding a boy playing with matches undermines a GW factor?

Once again, I am not saying the GW is at play here, merely that finding something that STARTED a fire says nothing on that question.

D’oh..

By: Kevin

Kevin — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:40:57 +0000

But aren't Bush's policies in Iraq the real reason that the fire was angry and attacked those 21 houses? Another take on it here.