<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revealed: Pro-lifers want to treat womyn as &#8220;property&#8221;!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2Hotel9</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/comment-page-1/#comment-728441</link>
		<dc:creator>2Hotel9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/#comment-728441</guid>
		<description>Feminazis see a box that might contain a baby and their immediate reaction is to run over it with their car.

I am actually amazed more &quot;box the baby came in&quot; jokes are not flying about. Rather disappointing.

And joe, since the tpf comment was not in a foreign language, exactly how was it &quot;translated&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feminazis see a box that might contain a baby and their immediate reaction is to run over it with their car.</p>
<p>I am actually amazed more &#8220;box the baby came in&#8221; jokes are not flying about. Rather disappointing.</p>
<p>And joe, since the tpf comment was not in a foreign language, exactly how was it &#8220;translated&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WomanofAbomination</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/comment-page-1/#comment-728339</link>
		<dc:creator>WomanofAbomination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/#comment-728339</guid>
		<description>The irrationality and warped logic of the feminist argument here enrages me.  They must deny that there is a baby in the box, because their illusions of moral superiority and fairness are shattered by its existence.  So they warp reality to suit their world view. This isn&#039;t a life, so I&#039;m not a killer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irrationality and warped logic of the feminist argument here enrages me.  They must deny that there is a baby in the box, because their illusions of moral superiority and fairness are shattered by its existence.  So they warp reality to suit their world view. This isn&#8217;t a life, so I&#8217;m not a killer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Skubinna</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/comment-page-1/#comment-728321</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Skubinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/#comment-728321</guid>
		<description>Thanks for another drive by, joe.  I always appreciate your little demonstrations of liberal mendacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for another drive by, joe.  I always appreciate your little demonstrations of liberal mendacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Thunder Run</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/comment-page-1/#comment-728310</link>
		<dc:creator>The Thunder Run</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/#comment-728310</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web Reconnaissance for 11/20/2007&lt;/strong&gt;

A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web Reconnaissance for 11/20/2007</strong></p>
<p>A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great White Rat</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/comment-page-1/#comment-728278</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/#comment-728278</guid>
		<description>Wrong again, Joe.  ST is exactly right about the TPF post.  In fact, she quoted it completely.  TPF said nothing at all about caring or not caring for children after they&#039;re born.  The only one engaging in gross distortion is you.

As for the Desire-eh comment, medical technology now allows &lt;strike&gt;parent&lt;/strike&gt; sperm and egg donors (sorry, forgot you don&#039;t think of them as parents, do you?) to find out a lot of details about their prospective offspring, and then kill the child if he/she doesn&#039;t meet desired specifications.  Try &lt;a href=&quot;http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/10/16/controversy-would-discovery-of-so-called-gay-gene-lead-to-women-aborting-gay-babies/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;this&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; one on for size - that ought to make your politically correct head spin for a while.

And if you don&#039;t think some women abort strictly because motherhood would cramp their lifestyle, I give you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/18/magazine/18LIVES.html?pagewanted=1&amp;ei=5090&amp;en=f4176027eece64e3&amp;ex=1247889600&amp;partner=rssuserland&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Amy Richards&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; of New York, who found herself carrying triplets and decided to abort two of them.  Listen to this self-centered woman&#039;s reason:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m going to have to move to Staten Island. I&#039;ll never leave my house because I&#039;ll have to care for these children. I&#039;ll have to start shopping only at Costco and buying big jars of mayonnaise.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, the horrors!

Translation:  it&#039;s all about &lt;em&gt;meeeeee&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong again, Joe.  ST is exactly right about the TPF post.  In fact, she quoted it completely.  TPF said nothing at all about caring or not caring for children after they&#8217;re born.  The only one engaging in gross distortion is you.</p>
<p>As for the Desire-eh comment, medical technology now allows <strike>parent</strike> sperm and egg donors (sorry, forgot you don&#8217;t think of them as parents, do you?) to find out a lot of details about their prospective offspring, and then kill the child if he/she doesn&#8217;t meet desired specifications.  Try <a href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/10/16/controversy-would-discovery-of-so-called-gay-gene-lead-to-women-aborting-gay-babies/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"><strong>this</strong></a> one on for size &#8211; that ought to make your politically correct head spin for a while.</p>
<p>And if you don&#8217;t think some women abort strictly because motherhood would cramp their lifestyle, I give you <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/18/magazine/18LIVES.html?pagewanted=1&amp;ei=5090&amp;en=f4176027eece64e3&amp;ex=1247889600&amp;partner=rssuserland" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>Amy Richards</strong></a> of New York, who found herself carrying triplets and decided to abort two of them.  Listen to this self-centered woman&#8217;s reason:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m going to have to move to Staten Island. I&#8217;ll never leave my house because I&#8217;ll have to care for these children. I&#8217;ll have to start shopping only at Costco and buying big jars of mayonnaise.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, the horrors!</p>
<p>Translation:  it&#8217;s all about <em>meeeeee</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeCitizen</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/comment-page-1/#comment-728262</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeCitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/#comment-728262</guid>
		<description>Your &quot;translation&quot; of the TPF comment is a gross distortion. She is accusing the anti-choicers of not caring for children once they are born, only when they are fetuses. And that that is sad.

You may violently disagree with that sentiment, but you should at least translate it honestly if you are going to comment on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;translation&#8221; of the TPF comment is a gross distortion. She is accusing the anti-choicers of not caring for children once they are born, only when they are fetuses. And that that is sad.</p>
<p>You may violently disagree with that sentiment, but you should at least translate it honestly if you are going to comment on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanity</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/comment-page-1/#comment-728260</link>
		<dc:creator>sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/#comment-728260</guid>
		<description>Hmm link didn&#039;t show...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogsforvictory.com/2007/11/19/sister-toldjah-wise-woman-of-our-time/#comments&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sister Toldjah: Wise Woman of our Time&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm link didn&#8217;t show&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogsforvictory.com/2007/11/19/sister-toldjah-wise-woman-of-our-time/#comments" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>Sister Toldjah: Wise Woman of our Time</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanity</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/comment-page-1/#comment-728259</link>
		<dc:creator>sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/11/19/revealed-pro-lifers-want-to-treat-womyn-as-property/#comment-728259</guid>
		<description>Hey ST, ran across Blogs for Victory (formerly Blogs for Bush) post on one of your articles today.

Sister Toldjah: Wise Woman of our Time&lt;/a&gt;

Just thought you should know, O&#039; wise woman of our time....

[grins]

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Now, for anyone who wants to take a stab at the good Sister: &lt;b&gt;keep in mind that she&#039;s exceptionally smart and drop-dead gorgeous.&lt;/b&gt; As Winston Churchill once observed, you can&#039;t snub a beautiful woman - the snub recoils, and the woman remains beautiful.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Think you may have more infatuated readers out there ST.

[chuckles]

Sorry, couldn&#039;t help but tease you a lil&#039; bit.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey ST, ran across Blogs for Victory (formerly Blogs for Bush) post on one of your articles today.</p>
<p>Sister Toldjah: Wise Woman of our Time</p>
<p>Just thought you should know, O&#8217; wise woman of our time&#8230;.</p>
<p>[grins]</p>
<blockquote><p>
Now, for anyone who wants to take a stab at the good Sister: <b>keep in mind that she&#8217;s exceptionally smart and drop-dead gorgeous.</b> As Winston Churchill once observed, you can&#8217;t snub a beautiful woman &#8211; the snub recoils, and the woman remains beautiful.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Think you may have more infatuated readers out there ST.</p>
<p>[chuckles]</p>
<p>Sorry, couldn&#8217;t help but tease you a lil&#8217; bit&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
