<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A tale of two retractions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/02/a-tale-of-two-retractions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/02/a-tale-of-two-retractions/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/02/a-tale-of-two-retractions/comment-page-1/#comment-729440</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/02/a-tale-of-two-retractions/#comment-729440</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s like I always say.  It is easier to nail Jello to the wall than get a liberal to do the right thing. Yet another case of lime jello sliding down the wall. - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like I always say.  It is easier to nail Jello to the wall than get a liberal to do the right thing. Yet another case of lime jello sliding down the wall. &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCD</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/02/a-tale-of-two-retractions/comment-page-1/#comment-729424</link>
		<dc:creator>PCD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/02/a-tale-of-two-retractions/#comment-729424</guid>
		<description>Liberals don&#039;t understand being ethical as all their gains come after violating any kind of ethics.

TNR should never be referenced as a credible publication or a source to back your arguments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberals don&#8217;t understand being ethical as all their gains come after violating any kind of ethics.</p>
<p>TNR should never be referenced as a credible publication or a source to back your arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoddy reporting on both sides&#8230; and the difference&#8230; &#124; BitsBlog</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/02/a-tale-of-two-retractions/comment-page-1/#comment-729389</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoddy reporting on both sides&#8230; and the difference&#8230; &#124; BitsBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/02/a-tale-of-two-retractions/#comment-729389</guid>
		<description>[...] Maybe that&#8217;s why the response form the left side of the &#8217;sphereÂ  has been rather subdued&#8230; As fellow Swamp Stomper Sister Toldjah says: Â It&#039;s a study in contrast between two popular online opinion outlets when questioned about the credibility of their reporting. TNR decided to try and put their accusers on the defensive, while feigning shock that anyone could possibly dare question their reporting, while NRO understood and addressed the concerns, apologized, and didn&#039;t lay the blame on the factcheckers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Maybe that&#8217;s why the response form the left side of the &#8217;sphereÂ  has been rather subdued&#8230; As fellow Swamp Stomper Sister Toldjah says: Â It&#8217;s a study in contrast between two popular online opinion outlets when questioned about the credibility of their reporting. TNR decided to try and put their accusers on the defensive, while feigning shock that anyone could possibly dare question their reporting, while NRO understood and addressed the concerns, apologized, and didn&#8217;t lay the blame on the factcheckers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
