<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Romney &#8220;Faith in America&#8221; speech (MORE: VIDEO LINK TO SPEECH ADDED)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:05:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-729972</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/#comment-729972</guid>
		<description>The Declaration is not a legal document - the nation is governed by the Constitution which never mentions &quot;God&quot;. The framers knew very well that the people needed freedom from religion as well as freedom of religion. As for Mitt, he managed to piss off both the bible-waivers and the athiests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Declaration is not a legal document &#8211; the nation is governed by the Constitution which never mentions &#8220;God&#8221;. The framers knew very well that the people needed freedom from religion as well as freedom of religion. As for Mitt, he managed to piss off both the bible-waivers and the athiests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aquila</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-729580</link>
		<dc:creator>Aquila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/#comment-729580</guid>
		<description>What the mainstream media do not understand is that Christians are antagonistic toward Mormons because Mormonism is fundamentally antagonistic toward Christianity.

Mormon doctrine teaches that the LDS church is the &quot; true Church of Jesus Christ today&quot;. By saying this, they are marginalizing traditional Christianity. If they are the true Church then you cannot be, unless of course you join them and are baptized into the LDS church.

Moreover, there will be posters who will say, but the Christian Churches say the same thing. You Christians are just as bigoted as the Mormons. Traditional Christianity does not say this, it says &quot;Jesus is the only way&quot;. 

There is a world of difference between these two perspectives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the mainstream media do not understand is that Christians are antagonistic toward Mormons because Mormonism is fundamentally antagonistic toward Christianity.</p>
<p>Mormon doctrine teaches that the LDS church is the &#8221; true Church of Jesus Christ today&#8221;. By saying this, they are marginalizing traditional Christianity. If they are the true Church then you cannot be, unless of course you join them and are baptized into the LDS church.</p>
<p>Moreover, there will be posters who will say, but the Christian Churches say the same thing. You Christians are just as bigoted as the Mormons. Traditional Christianity does not say this, it says &#8220;Jesus is the only way&#8221;. </p>
<p>There is a world of difference between these two perspectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBrainGuy</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-729575</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBrainGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/#comment-729575</guid>
		<description>Still haven&#039;t really warmed up to Romney, but he did seem more human during this speech.  There is a person behind the Brylcreem; what he really thinks is another matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still haven&#8217;t really warmed up to Romney, but he did seem more human during this speech.  There is a person behind the Brylcreem; what he really thinks is another matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-729557</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/#comment-729557</guid>
		<description>The final paragraph of the Declaration of Independance:

&lt;blockquote&gt;WE, therefore, the Representatives of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in GENERAL CONGRESS Assembled, appealing to the &lt;strong&gt;Supreme Judge of the World &lt;/strong&gt;for the Rectitude of our Intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly Publish and Declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES; that they are absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political Connexion between them and the State of Great-Britain, is, and ought to be, totally dissolved; and that as FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which INDEPENDENT STATES may of Right do. And for the Support of this Declaration, with a &lt;strong&gt;firm Reliance on the Protection of DIVINE PROVIDENCE&lt;/strong&gt;, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honour.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

This is the document that founded this country.  The Constitution founded a form of Goverment, this Country was formed with this document in 1776, not with the Constitution in 1787.  

Now who were our Founding Fathers writing about when they talked about the Supreme Judge of the World.  Notice the word Judge is singular not plural.  It is idiotic to believe this Country was not founded on Christian Beliefs and was not intended to be a Christian Country.  When our Founding Fathers wrote &quot;with a Firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence&quot; They were not writing about any other God than the Christian God.  And when they pledged their Lives, Fortunes, and &quot;Sacred Honour&quot;, Who was it that made their Honour Sacred??? It was Jesus Christ and His Father in the Heavens, the same person who will be the Surpreme Judge of the World.  

Lastly, I get alittle tired of the whole Jefferson &quot;wall of seperation&quot; argument.  Jefferson was in France while the Constitution was written.  He had little to do with it.  The Wall of Seperation letter was written almost 15 years later and even tho he believed in this wall as President he did not as Governor of Virginia, as he declared days of fasting and prayer.  The object was to end the influence of a specific church group over the government, not to get rid of God in the public square.  This needs to change, as this country has done nothing but gone down hill since the Supreme Courts stupid decision. - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final paragraph of the Declaration of Independance:</p>
<blockquote><p>WE, therefore, the Representatives of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in GENERAL CONGRESS Assembled, appealing to the <strong>Supreme Judge of the World </strong>for the Rectitude of our Intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly Publish and Declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES; that they are absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political Connexion between them and the State of Great-Britain, is, and ought to be, totally dissolved; and that as FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which INDEPENDENT STATES may of Right do. And for the Support of this Declaration, with a <strong>firm Reliance on the Protection of DIVINE PROVIDENCE</strong>, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honour.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is the document that founded this country.  The Constitution founded a form of Goverment, this Country was formed with this document in 1776, not with the Constitution in 1787.  </p>
<p>Now who were our Founding Fathers writing about when they talked about the Supreme Judge of the World.  Notice the word Judge is singular not plural.  It is idiotic to believe this Country was not founded on Christian Beliefs and was not intended to be a Christian Country.  When our Founding Fathers wrote &#8220;with a Firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence&#8221; They were not writing about any other God than the Christian God.  And when they pledged their Lives, Fortunes, and &#8220;Sacred Honour&#8221;, Who was it that made their Honour Sacred??? It was Jesus Christ and His Father in the Heavens, the same person who will be the Surpreme Judge of the World.  </p>
<p>Lastly, I get alittle tired of the whole Jefferson &#8220;wall of seperation&#8221; argument.  Jefferson was in France while the Constitution was written.  He had little to do with it.  The Wall of Seperation letter was written almost 15 years later and even tho he believed in this wall as President he did not as Governor of Virginia, as he declared days of fasting and prayer.  The object was to end the influence of a specific church group over the government, not to get rid of God in the public square.  This needs to change, as this country has done nothing but gone down hill since the Supreme Courts stupid decision. &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romney&#8217;s Religion Speech - A Solid &#8220;A&#8221; to Read and a &#8220;B-&#8221; to Watch : The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-729555</link>
		<dc:creator>Romney&#8217;s Religion Speech - A Solid &#8220;A&#8221; to Read and a &#8220;B-&#8221; to Watch : The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/#comment-729555</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Morrssey liked the speech and how Romney delivered it, though he thought it could have delivered more. Michelle Malkin thought that it was a &#8220;good day&#8221; if for no other reason than the speech put the matter of tolerance right back in the hands of the professional tolerance-lecturers. Sister Toldjah says that it&#8217;s a speech that has to be made, considering that Romney&#8217;s beliefs have been causing some concern. Michael van der Galien thought the speech was &#8220;great&#8221; and &#8220;awesome&#8221; and his live-blogging comments are well worth reading. Mary Katharine Ham liked the speech also, but felt about it much as I do. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Morrssey liked the speech and how Romney delivered it, though he thought it could have delivered more. Michelle Malkin thought that it was a &#8220;good day&#8221; if for no other reason than the speech put the matter of tolerance right back in the hands of the professional tolerance-lecturers. Sister Toldjah says that it&#8217;s a speech that has to be made, considering that Romney&#8217;s beliefs have been causing some concern. Michael van der Galien thought the speech was &#8220;great&#8221; and &#8220;awesome&#8221; and his live-blogging comments are well worth reading. Mary Katharine Ham liked the speech also, but felt about it much as I do. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliGazette &#187; Romney&#8217;s Major Speech: Conclusion</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-729554</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliGazette &#187; Romney&#8217;s Major Speech: Conclusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2007/12/06/the-romney-faith-in-america-speech/#comment-729554</guid>
		<description>[...] Sister Toldjah: &#8220;Personally, as a conservative Christian myself, Romney&#039;s Mormon beliefs have never been a factor for me. It&#039;s his seeming flip flops on several issues which has been my primary cause for alarm.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sister Toldjah: &#8220;Personally, as a conservative Christian myself, Romney&#8217;s Mormon beliefs have never been a factor for me. It&#8217;s his seeming flip flops on several issues which has been my primary cause for alarm.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
