Comments on: Hillary attacks caucus process, says it disenfranchises voters – PLUS: There are “no illegal women”

By: Comte DeLoach

Comte DeLoach — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:57:42 +0000

A hillary supporter group recently sued the Nevada state democrat party over the caucus being held there. So they want to disenfranchise the workers of the Culinary Union, because they support Obama and not hillary. LINK

By: NC Cop

NC Cop — Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:54:32 +0000

“No woman is illegal” Clinton said, to cheers.

Oh, I’m sorry, I misread that. I thought it said,

“No woman is illegal,” Bill Clinton said as he cheered.

By: Dr.D

Dr.D — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:16:54 +0000

“No woman is illegal” Clinton said, to cheers.

This makes it exceedingly clear where the Hildebeast stands on the border control problem. Not that there was a lot of doubt before hand, but this is a crystal clear confirmation of the fact that she does not recognize our border with mexico. For those of us who fought so hard this past year against amnesty and who want to see the border closed, this ought to be a very clear warning.

By: Steve Skubinna

Steve Skubinna — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:48:03 +0000

Right, NOW she’s concerned about people serving in the military. She left out that what she meant was people serving in the military who’d vote for her in the first place. Must be two, maybe three dozen of them. Meanwhile, how many military absentee ballots did her pal Al Gore trash in Florida in 2000?

But she missed an opportunity here. I would have expected her to show up wearing a sombrero, a serape, and a Pancho Villa mustache. But maybe her Mexican accent still needs work – her dialog coach probably told her to hold off on it.

By: Lorica

Lorica — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:18:18 +0000

A man shouted through an opening in the wall that his wife was illegal.

“No woman is illegal” Clinton said, to cheers

.
Yet another plant??? I bet so. – Lorica

By: Lorica

Lorica — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:15:44 +0000

Disenfranchisement??? This is why almost 2 Million Iowans didn’t show up for the caucus?? I agree with PCD, this is a loser’s argument. – Lorica

By: PCD

PCD — Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:59:47 +0000

I have been hearing this disenfranchisement argument on the “Real Debate Wisconsin” blog from a lib. It was part of his whine about sharing power, the power of the Iowa Caucus with Wisconsin.

It is just a loser’s lament. The fact that Hillary is engaging in Loser’s Laments is a Freudian Slip that she recognizes that she is losing, and will lose.