<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Showtime: It&#8217;s Supah Dupah Tuesday (UPDATE 14: EARLY EXITS FROM MA SHOW ROMNEY AHEAD, HILLARY AND O-MAN NECK AND NECK)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:53:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J Rob</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733681</link>
		<dc:creator>J Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733681</guid>
		<description>Sister, I agree with you on most things, but I do not agree with your interpretation of the implications of Sen. Dole&#039;s letter. For someone with the title &quot;Senator&quot; in front of his name, retired or not, to ask a private citizen to tone down criticism of another person with &quot;Senator&quot; in front of his name is just wrong. It is even more egregious when the latter is running for President of the US. Dole and McCain deserve every syllable of honest criticism they receive for this conduct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sister, I agree with you on most things, but I do not agree with your interpretation of the implications of Sen. Dole&#8217;s letter. For someone with the title &#8220;Senator&#8221; in front of his name, retired or not, to ask a private citizen to tone down criticism of another person with &#8220;Senator&#8221; in front of his name is just wrong. It is even more egregious when the latter is running for President of the US. Dole and McCain deserve every syllable of honest criticism they receive for this conduct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733658</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733658</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don&#039;t know, besides everything else, there is just something I do not like about McCain, don&#039;t exactly know what, but I do not like him at all. &lt;/blockquote&gt; Could it be the way he uses ethics?  I am still waiting for the straight talk from the straight talk express.  Could it be the lack of party discipline, but yet bad mouths anyone who doesn&#039;t agree with him??  Or possibly just the whininess whenever he doesn&#039;t get his way.  /sniff I didn&#039;t get the 2000 nomination so I am leaving the party  Yeah, there is a whole lot to dislike about John McCain, but to single out just one thing, would be almost impossible. - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don&#8217;t know, besides everything else, there is just something I do not like about McCain, don&#8217;t exactly know what, but I do not like him at all. </p></blockquote>
<p> Could it be the way he uses ethics?  I am still waiting for the straight talk from the straight talk express.  Could it be the lack of party discipline, but yet bad mouths anyone who doesn&#8217;t agree with him??  Or possibly just the whininess whenever he doesn&#8217;t get his way.  /sniff I didn&#8217;t get the 2000 nomination so I am leaving the party  Yeah, there is a whole lot to dislike about John McCain, but to single out just one thing, would be almost impossible. &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733649</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733649</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my &lt;a href=&quot;http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/supah-dupah-tuesday-post-2-the-results/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;evening SDT post&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my <a href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/supah-dupah-tuesday-post-2-the-results/" rel="nofollow"><strong>evening SDT post</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733643</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733643</guid>
		<description>I voted at 4:30 EST at my usual polling place, with the traditional New York State mechanical marvels still deployed.

I was 245th in my ED to vote (they tally total voters; not party by party). That&#039;s the highest number I can ever recall for a primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted at 4:30 EST at my usual polling place, with the traditional New York State mechanical marvels still deployed.</p>
<p>I was 245th in my ED to vote (they tally total voters; not party by party). That&#8217;s the highest number I can ever recall for a primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanity</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733642</link>
		<dc:creator>sanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733642</guid>
		<description>The more and more i read and watch the McCain campaign, the more I dislike him.

With Thompson no longer a viable option that will leave me Romney, not McCain.

People seem to think McCain is hte standard of conservatism, if so, then that is a brand of conservatism I do not want ot be a part of.

As for his temper, I understand enveryone has a temper, but McCain doesn&#039;t seem to be able to control his to a degree, yelling and screaming at subordinates and colleagues the same - we cannot have this type of behaviour in someone who represents the US to the World.

As for is policies / and ideals, he may be firm in his belief, but what exactly are those beliefs? He has gone together and sponsored many DEMOCRAT formed bills, and while he may be strong on troops and Iraq, I do not believe he holds the way things need to be at home to heart, when his ideals seem to be more liberal on the home front than anything else.

If a &#039;backroom&#039; deal was brokered behind closed doors between McCain and Huckabee, then that seems to be right in line with how the Liberals do thinsg, making secret deals behind closed doors. Another reason not to like these actions.

As for Huckabee, it definately seems he is in McCain&#039;s pocket now, since all his rhetoric and attacks are against Romney and no longer against the front runner McCain....why do suppose that is?

What do you think McCain has promised Huckabee? VP position?

I have heard other tout that at least with McCain you know what your getting and he is up front and sticks with his convictions - well what does backroom dealings tell us? These are hte convictions he holds dear? This is up front?

I don&#039;t know, besides everything else, there is just something I do not like about McCain, don&#039;t exactly know what, but I do not like him at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more and more i read and watch the McCain campaign, the more I dislike him.</p>
<p>With Thompson no longer a viable option that will leave me Romney, not McCain.</p>
<p>People seem to think McCain is hte standard of conservatism, if so, then that is a brand of conservatism I do not want ot be a part of.</p>
<p>As for his temper, I understand enveryone has a temper, but McCain doesn&#8217;t seem to be able to control his to a degree, yelling and screaming at subordinates and colleagues the same &#8211; we cannot have this type of behaviour in someone who represents the US to the World.</p>
<p>As for is policies / and ideals, he may be firm in his belief, but what exactly are those beliefs? He has gone together and sponsored many DEMOCRAT formed bills, and while he may be strong on troops and Iraq, I do not believe he holds the way things need to be at home to heart, when his ideals seem to be more liberal on the home front than anything else.</p>
<p>If a &#8216;backroom&#8217; deal was brokered behind closed doors between McCain and Huckabee, then that seems to be right in line with how the Liberals do thinsg, making secret deals behind closed doors. Another reason not to like these actions.</p>
<p>As for Huckabee, it definately seems he is in McCain&#8217;s pocket now, since all his rhetoric and attacks are against Romney and no longer against the front runner McCain&#8230;.why do suppose that is?</p>
<p>What do you think McCain has promised Huckabee? VP position?</p>
<p>I have heard other tout that at least with McCain you know what your getting and he is up front and sticks with his convictions &#8211; well what does backroom dealings tell us? These are hte convictions he holds dear? This is up front?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, besides everything else, there is just something I do not like about McCain, don&#8217;t exactly know what, but I do not like him at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neocon News Â» REMEMBER THE CONSERVATIVES (stickied for the evening)</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733640</link>
		<dc:creator>Neocon News Â» REMEMBER THE CONSERVATIVES (stickied for the evening)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733640</guid>
		<description>[...] Sister Toldjah Â» Showtime: It&#039;s Supah Dupah Tuesdsay (UPDATE 1: VOTING DELAYS IN HOBOKEN, NJ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sister Toldjah Â» Showtime: It&#8217;s Supah Dupah Tuesdsay (UPDATE 1: VOTING DELAYS IN HOBOKEN, NJ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedintheShed</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733639</link>
		<dc:creator>TedintheShed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733639</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The full quote provides concrete proof that Rush Limbaugh has lost his perspective on this issue. It&#039;s one thing to argue against a McCain candidacy - but for him to suggest, after his years of telling people that Democrats leading us in the GWOT would be a disaster, to now say they wouldn&#039;t be so bad is ludicrous. This is Rush&#039;s way of trying to provide a cushion for himself should he decide to sit this election out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am no fan of Limbaugh, but I realize he does at times use the &quot;theatre of the absurd&quot; to make his points.

That said, Obama and McCain there are stark differences between in the GWoT, but I don&#039;t see much of a difference between sHillary and Juan McLame at all.

But that is a secondary issue for me. Survival of America from her greatest threat, the politician, is the #1 issue at hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The full quote provides concrete proof that Rush Limbaugh has lost his perspective on this issue. It&#8217;s one thing to argue against a McCain candidacy &#8211; but for him to suggest, after his years of telling people that Democrats leading us in the GWOT would be a disaster, to now say they wouldn&#8217;t be so bad is ludicrous. This is Rush&#8217;s way of trying to provide a cushion for himself should he decide to sit this election out.</p></blockquote>
<p>I am no fan of Limbaugh, but I realize he does at times use the &#8220;theatre of the absurd&#8221; to make his points.</p>
<p>That said, Obama and McCain there are stark differences between in the GWoT, but I don&#8217;t see much of a difference between sHillary and Juan McLame at all.</p>
<p>But that is a secondary issue for me. Survival of America from her greatest threat, the politician, is the #1 issue at hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Teach</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733638</link>
		<dc:creator>William Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733638</guid>
		<description>I heard on the radio that San Fran was having voting issues, something about missing machines or something. Notice how stuff like this always seems to happen in voting precincts run by Surrender Monkeys?

You know they will blame it on some vast right wing conspiracy, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard on the radio that San Fran was having voting issues, something about missing machines or something. Notice how stuff like this always seems to happen in voting precincts run by Surrender Monkeys?</p>
<p>You know they will blame it on some vast right wing conspiracy, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xdust</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733637</link>
		<dc:creator>Xdust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733637</guid>
		<description>Nah, its not collusion.

Huck and McCain simply don&#039;t like Romney personally.

Besides, Huck wants that win also. Maybe in his mind, if he can knock Romney out, he can go Head to Head with McCain down the stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, its not collusion.</p>
<p>Huck and McCain simply don&#8217;t like Romney personally.</p>
<p>Besides, Huck wants that win also. Maybe in his mind, if he can knock Romney out, he can go Head to Head with McCain down the stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733633</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733633</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Mike Huckabee has won WV&#039;s caucus&lt;/blockquote&gt; Well my fears are being realized.  The collusion between McCain and Huckabee in full display here.  Like I said before, if McCain chooses Huckabee for his running mate, this party is damned by such scheming lowlifes. - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Mike Huckabee has won WV&#8217;s caucus</p></blockquote>
<p> Well my fears are being realized.  The collusion between McCain and Huckabee in full display here.  Like I said before, if McCain chooses Huckabee for his running mate, this party is damned by such scheming lowlifes. &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great White Rat</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733631</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733631</guid>
		<description>Well said, Steve.  Very much like what I said in two previous comments (&lt;a href=&quot;http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/01/23/reckless-abandonment/#comment-732772&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;here&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/01/23/reckless-abandonment/#comment-732794&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;here&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;), but more concise and to the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Steve.  Very much like what I said in two previous comments (<a href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/01/23/reckless-abandonment/#comment-732772" rel="nofollow"><strong>here</strong></a> and <a href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/01/23/reckless-abandonment/#comment-732794" rel="nofollow"><strong>here</strong></a>), but more concise and to the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733628</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733628</guid>
		<description>Global peace center.. unbelievable.  So goodbye to mucho tourism dollars, San Francisco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global peace center.. unbelievable.  So goodbye to mucho tourism dollars, San Francisco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveegg</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733627</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733627</guid>
		<description>Regarding the Rush v McCain brouhaha, my calculus regarding a McCain nomination is two-fold:

- Will McCain win the War on Terror in 4 years (folks, he&#039;s not going to be a 2-termer)?
- Will that victory be worth the solidification of the liberals&#039; hold on power for the remainder of my lifetime?

Given his stances on Gitmo, the detention of illegal combatants, and enhanced interrogation, I cannot be convinced that he will win the larger war.  Therefore, that solidification of the liberals&#039; hold on power is not worth it, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Rush v McCain brouhaha, my calculus regarding a McCain nomination is two-fold:</p>
<p>- Will McCain win the War on Terror in 4 years (folks, he&#8217;s not going to be a 2-termer)?<br />
- Will that victory be worth the solidification of the liberals&#8217; hold on power for the remainder of my lifetime?</p>
<p>Given his stances on Gitmo, the detention of illegal combatants, and enhanced interrogation, I cannot be convinced that he will win the larger war.  Therefore, that solidification of the liberals&#8217; hold on power is not worth it, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733625</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733625</guid>
		<description>When it comes to Iraq, McCain is &lt;em&gt;starkly&lt;/em&gt; different than Obama and Hillary and once upon a time we all believed that victory in Iraq was a crucial one we needed in the WOT.  Just because Hillary Clinton &quot;may&quot; keep our troops in Iraq means nothing when you consider what kind of Commander in Chief she would be, and the kind of &quot;military experts&quot; she&#039;d surround herself with (like Gen. Wesley Clark).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to Iraq, McCain is <em>starkly</em> different than Obama and Hillary and once upon a time we all believed that victory in Iraq was a crucial one we needed in the WOT.  Just because Hillary Clinton &#8220;may&#8221; keep our troops in Iraq means nothing when you consider what kind of Commander in Chief she would be, and the kind of &#8220;military experts&#8221; she&#8217;d surround herself with (like Gen. Wesley Clark).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/comment-page-1/#comment-733624</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/02/05/showtime-its-supah-dupah-tuesdsay/#comment-733624</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It&#039;s one thing to argue against a McCain candidacy - but for him to suggest, after his years of telling people that Democrats leading us in the GWOT would be a disaster, to now say they wouldn&#039;t be so bad is ludicrous.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

El Rushbo isn&#039;t saying that. He&#039;s saying McCain will be as bad as the Democrats. Don&#039;t forget, McCain wants to extend the Bill of Rights to foreign jihadists and shut down Club G&#039;itmo and give those jihadists access to American courts. There&#039;s no difference between him and Hillary or Obama on those issues. He just views the war on terror as a criminal/law enforcement matter, like the Clintons did and the Left does.

And Tango is right. It&#039;s classic rope-a-dope, with gullible GOP voters playing the role of dope. Allowing the Democrats and the Drive By Media to select their candidate is political suicide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s one thing to argue against a McCain candidacy &#8211; but for him to suggest, after his years of telling people that Democrats leading us in the GWOT would be a disaster, to now say they wouldn&#8217;t be so bad is ludicrous.</p></blockquote>
<p>El Rushbo isn&#8217;t saying that. He&#8217;s saying McCain will be as bad as the Democrats. Don&#8217;t forget, McCain wants to extend the Bill of Rights to foreign jihadists and shut down Club G&#8217;itmo and give those jihadists access to American courts. There&#8217;s no difference between him and Hillary or Obama on those issues. He just views the war on terror as a criminal/law enforcement matter, like the Clintons did and the Left does.</p>
<p>And Tango is right. It&#8217;s classic rope-a-dope, with gullible GOP voters playing the role of dope. Allowing the Democrats and the Drive By Media to select their candidate is political suicide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
