Audacity of Truth
Rahmbo:
"Rahm Emanuel is son of the devil's spawn. He is an individual who would sell his mother to get a vote. He would strap his children to the front end of a steam locomotive."
-Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY) on Obama's COS, 3/7/10
Velvet Lair- Legends March 18, 2010
- Some things are just not cute March 18, 2010
- The adventures of the lady spider killer continue March 11, 2010
- Intermission February 19, 2010
- People who allow their dogs to poop in other people’s yards February 16, 2010
Observations
Is it just me, or is there anyone else who sees something wrong with a woman who sells herself for cash being in position to make hundreds of thousands – perhaps even millions – from selling her music as a result of this scandal, telling her story and/or posing for pictorial spreads in one of major “men’s magazines,” while the hypocritical prosecutor-turned governor who paid for her “services” is fighting to stay out of prison, his reputation ruined by his own machinations?
Isn’t this sad state of affairs (no pun intended)? I mean, I fully expect (and hope) that Spitzer will be punished to the fullest extent of the law, but what about her? She sold her body for money. Repeatedly. This is the classic definition for not just a mere “escort” but a bonafide (high-priced) prostitute and one who, sadly, is being glorified thanks to the sob stories we’re reading about her ‘troubled childhood’ in the press.
On a related note, People magazine has a picture of Madonna’s latest album cover (the album will be released in late April) where she looks like, well, a ho – one who will be using a Sharon Stone-in-Basic-Instinct-esque image to make more $$.
Can you tell I’m disgusted? Where’s my cabana boy to make me a drink when I need him? 
RSS feed for comments on this post.
8 Responses to “Observations”
Comments
Blogads
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of ST's advertisers, nor do their opinions necessarily reflect ST's. Stats
Relax, Sis. You don’t need no cabana boy. Just a bottle in one hand and a glass in the other. Ditch the glass when it gets too confusing.
ST at least she did not meet Ted K first.
By the way have you seen this?
kennedy_dumping_oil_itno_nantucket_sound
All of this obsession with Spitzer’s call girl habit and the cash involved reminds me of back in the 80’s when the movie “Sharky’s Machine” came out, about a high priced call girl and a detective (Rachel Ward and Burt Reynolds). My boss at the time said that he was watching it and mentioned out loud “wow, I wonder what thousand dollar would be like?” to which his wife replied “After 20 years of marriage, I’d have thought you’d consider that cheap.”
On a somewhat related note, heard a great Bill and Hillary joke:
When they got married, Bill told Hillary that there would always be a box under the bed that was his and that she must never look in it. She abided by this agreement until just a few weeks ago, when curiosity finally got the better of her and she opened it and peeked. Inside were 3 empty beer cans and $8,679 dollars. She admitted she peeked, and asked him about the beer cans. Bill said “Well, whenever I was unfaithful to you, I drank a beer and put the can in the box.” She was hurt, but thought, well, 3 times, I can understand that, Monica and Flowers and such. Then she asked him about the money, to which he replied “Well, whenever the box got too full of cans I turned them in for recycling and put the money in the box instead…”
Get sick of the MSM going on about her as if she is a teenage american idol or something.
One news report I heard they called her a former call girl and mainly a SINGER, and then went on adn on about how fresh faced and young she is, and her singing career…
Clue one…she was a hooker, get the facts straight MSM.
Now that Eliot Spitzer has resigned as Governor of New York, the big question is whether he will be charged for a criminal act. During the past two days since the story broke, speculation has run rampant that Spitzer might be using resignation as a bargaining chip against being prosecuted. From my own law enforcement experience, albeit drug law enforcement, I see a strong possibilty that Spitzer is in serious trouble.
According to published reports, the investigation arose when Spitzer’s own bank alerted IRS to suspicious bank transfers (apparently to off-shore accounts). That led to a federal wiretap that identified the prostitution operation that involved the governor.
Those types of bank transfers have also been prominent in the drug trade, where traffickers used bank wire transfers to send drug proceeds or payments for drugs. The IRS, to their credit, educated banks decades ago as to what was happening and enlisted their cooperation in uncovering drug money movements.
Under federal law, financial institutions are required by law to report money transactions in excess of $10,000 to the IRS. Drug traffickers, aware of that requirement, resorted to sending smaller amounts under $10,000, often going to multiple banks and sending multiple shipments of funds. That is also a crime-called Structuring, in essence, attempting to circumvent the reporting requirements.
So now, the question is-what exactly did Spitzer do in sending money to a criminal enterprise in the amount of tens of thousands of dollars? Of course, many will argue that it makes no sense to prosecute a man for patronizing prostitutes, although others will argue-why prosecute prostitutes and not their customers? The Mann Act is also in play, but I think the money transfer to a criminal enterprise is Spitzer’s most serious problem. At this point, it appears (though not yet proven) that the Governor of New York (and former Attorney General who prosecuted prostitution rings) has engaged in a conspiracy with a large scale criminal organization and violated currency transaction laws in order to cover up his illegal activity. Of importance is what quantities did Spitzer transfer to the Emperor’s Club? Apparently, it was suspicious enough to cause the bank(s)in question to alert the IRS. If,in fact, the money transfers were illegal, and given the fact that they were sent to a criminal enterprise, then Mr Spitzer is in deep legal trouble.
gary fouse
fousesquawk
Needin’ a frozen ‘rita, are we?
No, Sis, it’s not just you.
Why the double standard? Simple, the guy is SPITZER!
Spitzer bullied people, threaten legal action using the powers of his office for basically black mail, ruined many people’s reputations based on innuendo and in some cases nothing at all. The list of Spitzer’s enemies is too long to publish and his only friend is his dog (if he has one).
He played political hard ball and is now catching the return line drive in the “soft” balls.