<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ed Schultz continues the &#8220;McCain is a warmonger&#8221; battle cry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/07/ed-schultz-continues-the-mccain-is-a-warmonger-battle-cry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/07/ed-schultz-continues-the-mccain-is-a-warmonger-battle-cry/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/07/ed-schultz-continues-the-mccain-is-a-warmonger-battle-cry/comment-page-1/#comment-739465</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/07/ed-schultz-continues-the-mccain-is-a-warmonger-battle-cry/#comment-739465</guid>
		<description>Good Catch NC.  I totally forgot that one.  That is the problem with the left, they think a catchy sound bite is actually saying something important.  Life would be so much easier if they would just stick to one standard instead of changing things all the time. - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Catch NC.  I totally forgot that one.  That is the problem with the left, they think a catchy sound bite is actually saying something important.  Life would be so much easier if they would just stick to one standard instead of changing things all the time. &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NC Cop</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/07/ed-schultz-continues-the-mccain-is-a-warmonger-battle-cry/comment-page-1/#comment-739458</link>
		<dc:creator>NC Cop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/07/ed-schultz-continues-the-mccain-is-a-warmonger-battle-cry/#comment-739458</guid>
		<description>Well said, Bak.  I wished to God we wouldn&#039;t have had to go into Iraq, but I saw little choice.  Saddam already admitted to his interrogator that he was biding his time until he could get around the sanctions and restart his WMD program with it&#039;s main goal being acquiring a nuclear weapon.

McCain realizes that it was just a matter of time before we had to deal with Iraq and with Uday and Qusay waiting in the wings, Iraq wasn&#039;t going to change on it&#039;s own anytime soon.  It was also better to deal with Iraq on our terms, rather than on theirs.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I have heard some pretty colorful &quot;labels&quot; for BO. I am not repeating any of them because they are disrespectful.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I seem to recall one of McCain&#039;s supporters calling Obama by his name &quot;Hussein&quot;, and the left was freaking out!  So calling a candidate a &quot;warmonger&quot; is not disrespectful, but calling them by their name is.  

Got it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Bak.  I wished to God we wouldn&#8217;t have had to go into Iraq, but I saw little choice.  Saddam already admitted to his interrogator that he was biding his time until he could get around the sanctions and restart his WMD program with it&#8217;s main goal being acquiring a nuclear weapon.</p>
<p>McCain realizes that it was just a matter of time before we had to deal with Iraq and with Uday and Qusay waiting in the wings, Iraq wasn&#8217;t going to change on it&#8217;s own anytime soon.  It was also better to deal with Iraq on our terms, rather than on theirs.</p>
<blockquote><p>I have heard some pretty colorful &#8220;labels&#8221; for BO. I am not repeating any of them because they are disrespectful.</p></blockquote>
<p>I seem to recall one of McCain&#8217;s supporters calling Obama by his name &#8220;Hussein&#8221;, and the left was freaking out!  So calling a candidate a &#8220;warmonger&#8221; is not disrespectful, but calling them by their name is.  </p>
<p>Got it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baklava</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/07/ed-schultz-continues-the-mccain-is-a-warmonger-battle-cry/comment-page-1/#comment-739450</link>
		<dc:creator>Baklava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/07/ed-schultz-continues-the-mccain-is-a-warmonger-battle-cry/#comment-739450</guid>
		<description>Just like I said to Chen, most people don&#039;t want war. Most people wish there were no drug dealers, murderers, etc. But a recognition of the facts as we know them instead of wishing for utopia does not make somebody &quot;want&quot; war. We aren&#039;t warmongerers.

Peace through strength is better than peace through submission. We can debate about the merit of peace through strength or we can resort to name calling... 

I personally do not see any attempt by people on the left to understand our position or &quot;want&quot; to debate. 

Do you leftists want to debate or not?

Are you for leaving a country when the military commanders do not agree we could do that yet or not?

Are you for pulling out of Bosnia, Korea, Germany, Japan also or not?

Are you for a humanitiarian crisis if we left irresponsibly or not? 

Do you recognize what happened in Vietnam after we left or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like I said to Chen, most people don&#8217;t want war. Most people wish there were no drug dealers, murderers, etc. But a recognition of the facts as we know them instead of wishing for utopia does not make somebody &#8220;want&#8221; war. We aren&#8217;t warmongerers.</p>
<p>Peace through strength is better than peace through submission. We can debate about the merit of peace through strength or we can resort to name calling&#8230; </p>
<p>I personally do not see any attempt by people on the left to understand our position or &#8220;want&#8221; to debate. </p>
<p>Do you leftists want to debate or not?</p>
<p>Are you for leaving a country when the military commanders do not agree we could do that yet or not?</p>
<p>Are you for pulling out of Bosnia, Korea, Germany, Japan also or not?</p>
<p>Are you for a humanitiarian crisis if we left irresponsibly or not? </p>
<p>Do you recognize what happened in Vietnam after we left or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/07/ed-schultz-continues-the-mccain-is-a-warmonger-battle-cry/comment-page-1/#comment-739445</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/07/ed-schultz-continues-the-mccain-is-a-warmonger-battle-cry/#comment-739445</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The campaign stressed that Obama was not present when the &quot;warmonger&quot; comment was made &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Let me get this right, BO was being introduced, but still wasn&#039;t in the building???  How long is that introduction going to be??  Was he still on the plane when they started the introduction??  =))  Come on, is BO never around when this garbage is being spewed out of the mouths of his friends and mentors/spiritual advisors??   How many more times is he &quot;not going to be present&quot; before this lie grows old and stale??


&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Labeling a candidate is not being disrespectful&quot; Schultz told CNN host John Roberts. &lt;/blockquote&gt; Ohhh yeah???  I have heard some pretty colorful &quot;labels&quot; for BO.  I am not repeating any of them because they are disrespectful.  I will label this Schultz individual tho.  Idiot!!! - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The campaign stressed that Obama was not present when the &#8220;warmonger&#8221; comment was made </p></blockquote>
<p>Let me get this right, BO was being introduced, but still wasn&#8217;t in the building???  How long is that introduction going to be??  Was he still on the plane when they started the introduction??  <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_rotfl.gif' alt='&#61;&#41;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='30' height='18' title='&#61;&#41;&#41;' />  Come on, is BO never around when this garbage is being spewed out of the mouths of his friends and mentors/spiritual advisors??   How many more times is he &#8220;not going to be present&#8221; before this lie grows old and stale??</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Labeling a candidate is not being disrespectful&#8221; Schultz told CNN host John Roberts. </p></blockquote>
<p> Ohhh yeah???  I have heard some pretty colorful &#8220;labels&#8221; for BO.  I am not repeating any of them because they are disrespectful.  I will label this Schultz individual tho.  Idiot!!! &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC&#38;A</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/07/ed-schultz-continues-the-mccain-is-a-warmonger-battle-cry/comment-page-1/#comment-739420</link>
		<dc:creator>SC&#38;A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/07/ed-schultz-continues-the-mccain-is-a-warmonger-battle-cry/#comment-739420</guid>
		<description>If labeling McCain a &#039;warmonger&#039; is the best shot that Ed Schultz and his leftist lemmings in fantasyland can take at the GOP candidate, McCain is going to win by a lanslide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If labeling McCain a &#8216;warmonger&#8217; is the best shot that Ed Schultz and his leftist lemmings in fantasyland can take at the GOP candidate, McCain is going to win by a lanslide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
