<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing the Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gail Hillman</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/comment-page-1/#comment-740612</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail Hillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=5815#comment-740612</guid>
		<description>I would not want to use one of these unsafe fluoresent bulbs next to childs bed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not want to use one of these unsafe fluoresent bulbs next to childs bed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail Hillman</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/comment-page-1/#comment-740610</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail Hillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=5815#comment-740610</guid>
		<description>These fluorescent bulbs may not be used with a dimmer switch (less energy used).I have many of these in my home (over half of the bulbs ) are on dimmers.I also have several lamps which use three bulbs. The fluorescent bulbs do not come with the three way choose. My newspaper has stated that all fluorescent bulbs be taken to a drop off place about 20 miles from my home. I do not want to have these unsafe  bulbs in my home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These fluorescent bulbs may not be used with a dimmer switch (less energy used).I have many of these in my home (over half of the bulbs ) are on dimmers.I also have several lamps which use three bulbs. The fluorescent bulbs do not come with the three way choose. My newspaper has stated that all fluorescent bulbs be taken to a drop off place about 20 miles from my home. I do not want to have these unsafe  bulbs in my home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunsettommy</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/comment-page-1/#comment-740528</link>
		<dc:creator>sunsettommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=5815#comment-740528</guid>
		<description>I prefer full spectrum light bulbs.

I have always hated the &quot;glow&quot; bulbs.

I wonder if Albert is stocking up on the old incandescent bulbs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer full spectrum light bulbs.</p>
<p>I have always hated the &#8220;glow&#8221; bulbs.</p>
<p>I wonder if Albert is stocking up on the old incandescent bulbs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup &#187; Pirate&#8217;s Cove&#160;&#8212;&#160;Global Warming Rules!</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/comment-page-1/#comment-740521</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup &#187; Pirate&#8217;s Cove&#160;&#8212;&#160;Global Warming Rules!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=5815#comment-740521</guid>
		<description>[...] is not dead in Congress. See Sister Toldjah for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is not dead in Congress. See Sister Toldjah for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/comment-page-1/#comment-740466</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=5815#comment-740466</guid>
		<description>Renea, you also forget that Haz-Mat waste management will charge you for disposing of these bulbs.  So there again, whatever &quot;savings&quot; you were promised, is now gone by the wayside.  No matter how you cut it, this is going to cost us all more money. - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renea, you also forget that Haz-Mat waste management will charge you for disposing of these bulbs.  So there again, whatever &#8220;savings&#8221; you were promised, is now gone by the wayside.  No matter how you cut it, this is going to cost us all more money. &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renea</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/comment-page-1/#comment-740463</link>
		<dc:creator>Renea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=5815#comment-740463</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There is a caveat with the flourescent bulbs; &quot;contains mercury, please dispose of properly&quot;..

/so then is the consumer going to risk a fine (perhaps in the future) should the bulb end up in the trash? Or will there be a haz-mat disposal such as is required for spent medical needles?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Leave it to Congress not to tell you the whole story.  The fluorescent bulbs will need to be disposed of &quot;properly&quot; (not in your regular garbage) and here in central Iowa the Haz-Mat facility is only open limited hours during the week.  Real convenient for me.  So I have to stockpile the spent light bulbs, take an afternoon off to dispose of them and spend $10-$15 dollars in gas driving the 30 miles to the facility.  Seems to me I&#039;ve just negated the benefit of switching to the fluorescent bulbs.

Also, if one happens to break, will Haz-Mat come to my house to take care of the exposed mercury and will I need a Haz-Mat suit just to change a light bulb in case of breakage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There is a caveat with the flourescent bulbs; &#8220;contains mercury, please dispose of properly&#8221;..</p>
<p>/so then is the consumer going to risk a fine (perhaps in the future) should the bulb end up in the trash? Or will there be a haz-mat disposal such as is required for spent medical needles?</p></blockquote>
<p>Leave it to Congress not to tell you the whole story.  The fluorescent bulbs will need to be disposed of &#8220;properly&#8221; (not in your regular garbage) and here in central Iowa the Haz-Mat facility is only open limited hours during the week.  Real convenient for me.  So I have to stockpile the spent light bulbs, take an afternoon off to dispose of them and spend $10-$15 dollars in gas driving the 30 miles to the facility.  Seems to me I&#8217;ve just negated the benefit of switching to the fluorescent bulbs.</p>
<p>Also, if one happens to break, will Haz-Mat come to my house to take care of the exposed mercury and will I need a Haz-Mat suit just to change a light bulb in case of breakage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proof</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/comment-page-1/#comment-740446</link>
		<dc:creator>Proof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=5815#comment-740446</guid>
		<description>The dim bulbs that write the laws have little respect for the rights or wishes of their constituents. 

When I lived in California, I preferred CFLs for their energy savings. Now, living in &quot;globally warmed&quot; Ohio, I prefer incandescents for the &quot;waste&quot; heat they throw off! 
Plus, I hate to think that every broken CFL bulb requires a toxic waste clean up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dim bulbs that write the laws have little respect for the rights or wishes of their constituents. </p>
<p>When I lived in California, I preferred CFLs for their energy savings. Now, living in &#8220;globally warmed&#8221; Ohio, I prefer incandescents for the &#8220;waste&#8221; heat they throw off!<br />
Plus, I hate to think that every broken CFL bulb requires a toxic waste clean up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marsha Howell</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/comment-page-1/#comment-740443</link>
		<dc:creator>marsha Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=5815#comment-740443</guid>
		<description>There is a caveat with the flourescent bulbs; &quot;contains mercury, please dispose of properly&quot;..

  /so then is the consumer going to risk a fine (perhaps in the future) should the bulb end up in the trash? Or will there be a haz-mat disposal such as is required for spent medical needles?
  I&#039;m stocking up on incadescent.:-\&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a caveat with the flourescent bulbs; &#8220;contains mercury, please dispose of properly&#8221;..</p>
<p>  /so then is the consumer going to risk a fine (perhaps in the future) should the bulb end up in the trash? Or will there be a haz-mat disposal such as is required for spent medical needles?<br />
  I&#8217;m stocking up on incadescent.<img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_question.gif' alt='&#58;&#45;&#92;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#45;&#92;' />&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan K Freeberg</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/comment-page-1/#comment-740441</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan K Freeberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=5815#comment-740441</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And by the way, whatever is the case, this is not something Congress should have involved itself with.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yup, pretty much.

Read up on FDR&#039;s &quot;court packing plan&quot; from the 1930&#039;s, specifically, exactly what set it off. The Supreme Court rapped his knuckles because a lot of the stuff he strong-armed through Congress intruded into intrastate commerce...a lot of the other stuff did the same, and tried to use a lot of threadbare silly logic to re-label intrastate commerce as interstate commerce.

Back then, we had loud, noisy, passionate, vibrant debates about whether legislation imposed itself on intra- or inter-state commerce. If it was found to be the former, it was unconstitutional, no ifs, ands or buts. If it had already been passed, it was unenforceable, null and void.

This is intrastate commerce. We shouldn&#039;t even be discussing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And by the way, whatever is the case, this is not something Congress should have involved itself with.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yup, pretty much.</p>
<p>Read up on FDR&#8217;s &#8220;court packing plan&#8221; from the 1930&#8217;s, specifically, exactly what set it off. The Supreme Court rapped his knuckles because a lot of the stuff he strong-armed through Congress intruded into intrastate commerce&#8230;a lot of the other stuff did the same, and tried to use a lot of threadbare silly logic to re-label intrastate commerce as interstate commerce.</p>
<p>Back then, we had loud, noisy, passionate, vibrant debates about whether legislation imposed itself on intra- or inter-state commerce. If it was found to be the former, it was unconstitutional, no ifs, ands or buts. If it had already been passed, it was unenforceable, null and void.</p>
<p>This is intrastate commerce. We shouldn&#8217;t even be discussing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/comment-page-1/#comment-740440</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=5815#comment-740440</guid>
		<description>Well, look--the new bulbs last ten times longer, so in the end they don&#039;t cost more money, and might even save money. But: if there is an issue with mercury, then once again we have the law of unintended consequences rearing its ugly head.

And by the way, whatever is the case, this is not something Congress should have involved itself with.

:((</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, look&#8211;the new bulbs last ten times longer, so in the end they don&#8217;t cost more money, and might even save money. But: if there is an issue with mercury, then once again we have the law of unintended consequences rearing its ugly head.</p>
<p>And by the way, whatever is the case, this is not something Congress should have involved itself with.</p>
<p><img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_cry.gif' alt='&#58;&#40;&#40;' class='wp-smiley' width='22' height='18' title='&#58;&#40;&#40;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/comment-page-1/#comment-740437</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=5815#comment-740437</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;still others by concerns over their mercury content.&lt;/blockquote&gt; AMEN!!!  Does it make any sense to save a couple of kilowatts, and then spend millions cleaning up our land fills??  Eventually there will be 200 million American homes throwing these bulbs away, and all that mercury is going to contaminate something.  This is the continued 2 dimensional thinking on the part of Congress, and I quite frankly am getting tired of their stupidity.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;In other words, I&#039;m asking Congress to actually be â€“ hold your breath â€“ accountable to the people&lt;/blockquote&gt; OMG NO WAY!!!  Congress be accountable to the people???  Did hell just now freeze over??  This Congresswoman is stepping on some pretty big toes.  I hope she survives this.  

Let&#039;s face it, our Government has become a den of idiots and fools.  They ban a simple thing like a light bulb to &quot;save energy&quot;, but they won&#039;t put a stop to the 66 blends of gasoline that raise our gas prices.  They won&#039;t tell the states that have special gasoline, i.e. California, Colorado, that if they want special gas, they should provide their own refineries to get their special gas, and stop wasting the American people&#039;s dime.  I would find it less intrusive if these bozos mandated geo-thermal heating in new homes, if it&#039;s good enough for the President&#039;s ranch, it&#039;s good enough for everyone.  But instead these door knobs ban a freekin&#039; light bulb.  Yeah, I am glad my vote was counted.  Idiots. - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>still others by concerns over their mercury content.</p></blockquote>
<p> AMEN!!!  Does it make any sense to save a couple of kilowatts, and then spend millions cleaning up our land fills??  Eventually there will be 200 million American homes throwing these bulbs away, and all that mercury is going to contaminate something.  This is the continued 2 dimensional thinking on the part of Congress, and I quite frankly am getting tired of their stupidity.  </p>
<blockquote><p>In other words, I&#8217;m asking Congress to actually be â€“ hold your breath â€“ accountable to the people</p></blockquote>
<p> OMG NO WAY!!!  Congress be accountable to the people???  Did hell just now freeze over??  This Congresswoman is stepping on some pretty big toes.  I hope she survives this.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it, our Government has become a den of idiots and fools.  They ban a simple thing like a light bulb to &#8220;save energy&#8221;, but they won&#8217;t put a stop to the 66 blends of gasoline that raise our gas prices.  They won&#8217;t tell the states that have special gasoline, i.e. California, Colorado, that if they want special gas, they should provide their own refineries to get their special gas, and stop wasting the American people&#8217;s dime.  I would find it less intrusive if these bozos mandated geo-thermal heating in new homes, if it&#8217;s good enough for the President&#8217;s ranch, it&#8217;s good enough for everyone.  But instead these door knobs ban a freekin&#8217; light bulb.  Yeah, I am glad my vote was counted.  Idiots. &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/04/11/introducing-the-light-bulb-freedom-of-choice-act/comment-page-1/#comment-740436</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=5815#comment-740436</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Right-Of-Center Bloggers Select The Most &amp; Least Desired Vice-President For John McCain...&lt;/strong&gt;

Right Wing News emailed more than 230 right-of-center bloggers and asked them to send us a ranked list of 1-5 people they&#039;d most like to see as John McCain&#039;s Vice-President and the 1-5 people they&#039;d least like to see as......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Right-Of-Center Bloggers Select The Most &amp; Least Desired Vice-President For John McCain&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Right Wing News emailed more than 230 right-of-center bloggers and asked them to send us a ranked list of 1-5 people they&#8217;d most like to see as John McCain&#8217;s Vice-President and the 1-5 people they&#8217;d least like to see as&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
