<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush &#8220;lied&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/09/bush-lied/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/09/bush-lied/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:36:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/09/bush-lied/comment-page-1/#comment-743963</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6041#comment-743963</guid>
		<description>From the LA Times ..&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-kirchick16-2008jun16,0,4808346.story&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yet in spite&lt;/a&gt; of all the accusations of White House &quot;manipulation&quot; -- that it pressured intelligence analysts into connecting Hussein and Al Qaeda and concocted evidence about weapons of mass destruction -- &lt;b&gt;administration critics continually demonstrate an inability to distinguish making claims based on flawed intelligence from knowingly propagating falsehoods&lt;/b&gt;.
..
committee Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV got in this familiar shot: &quot;Sadly, the Bush administration led the nation into war under false pretenses.&quot;
Yet Rockefeller&#039;s highly partisan report does not substantiate its most explosive claims.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the LA Times ..<br />
<blockquote><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-kirchick16-2008jun16,0,4808346.story" rel="nofollow">Yet in spite</a> of all the accusations of White House &#8220;manipulation&#8221; &#8212; that it pressured intelligence analysts into connecting Hussein and Al Qaeda and concocted evidence about weapons of mass destruction &#8212; <b>administration critics continually demonstrate an inability to distinguish making claims based on flawed intelligence from knowingly propagating falsehoods</b>.<br />
..<br />
committee Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV got in this familiar shot: &#8220;Sadly, the Bush administration led the nation into war under false pretenses.&#8221;<br />
Yet Rockefeller&#8217;s highly partisan report does not substantiate its most explosive claims.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: United Conservatives of Virginia</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/09/bush-lied/comment-page-1/#comment-743551</link>
		<dc:creator>United Conservatives of Virginia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6041#comment-743551</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Who Lied?  Who is lying now?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Apparently, the Rockefeller report was supposed to be a big deal in &quot;exposing&quot; the President and his &quot;motives&quot; behind the invasion of Iraq.

Here&#039;s a round up of the blog reactions:...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Who Lied?  Who is lying now?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Apparently, the Rockefeller report was supposed to be a big deal in &#8220;exposing&#8221; the President and his &#8220;motives&#8221; behind the invasion of Iraq.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a round up of the blog reactions:&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorica</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/09/bush-lied/comment-page-1/#comment-743508</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6041#comment-743508</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Unmanned aerial vehicles &lt;/blockquote&gt; I remember when the UN Survey team found these.  The scientists were attempting to pack these up and ship them to a safe place where the team had already been.  The Swedish guy who was leading the Survey Team, attempted to tell the US that this was not reason enough to attack Iraq.  Iraq had all sorts of military equipment they were not suppose to have.  Technology they were not suppose to have too.  I remember when the found the latest MIG interceptor buried in the sand.  Why did Saddam need the latest MIG Interceptor??  Simple, he was sick and tired of our jets patroling the &quot;No Fly Zones&quot;.  He would have eventually used them on our fighters.  He would have lost, but he would have tried.  Just like he used radar guided mobile SAMs.  God Bless the man that created the JDAM Missile.  :)  

You know the continued short sightedness of the left continues to astonish me.  I usually shut them up with asking them 1 question.  I always ask them: &quot;Where was Osama going to go to next??&quot;  They usually shake their head in a lack of understanding. =)) No surprise that =))   But honestly, Osama set up a base of operations 1st in the Sudan, then in Afghanistan.  Well we had just kicked him out of Afghanistan.  WHere was he going to go??  You can&#039;t give me this blah blah blah about Saddam not liking Osama, Saddam loved anyone who got away with an attack on America.  We had to attack Iraq, Osama would have set up a base of operations in the western part of Iraq, and it would have taken alot more than what we have lost in this to root that dog out of there. - Lorica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Unmanned aerial vehicles </p></blockquote>
<p> I remember when the UN Survey team found these.  The scientists were attempting to pack these up and ship them to a safe place where the team had already been.  The Swedish guy who was leading the Survey Team, attempted to tell the US that this was not reason enough to attack Iraq.  Iraq had all sorts of military equipment they were not suppose to have.  Technology they were not suppose to have too.  I remember when the found the latest MIG interceptor buried in the sand.  Why did Saddam need the latest MIG Interceptor??  Simple, he was sick and tired of our jets patroling the &#8220;No Fly Zones&#8221;.  He would have eventually used them on our fighters.  He would have lost, but he would have tried.  Just like he used radar guided mobile SAMs.  God Bless the man that created the JDAM Missile.  <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_smiley.gif' alt='&#58;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#41;' />  </p>
<p>You know the continued short sightedness of the left continues to astonish me.  I usually shut them up with asking them 1 question.  I always ask them: &#8220;Where was Osama going to go to next??&#8221;  They usually shake their head in a lack of understanding. <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_rotfl.gif' alt='&#61;&#41;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='30' height='18' title='&#61;&#41;&#41;' /> No surprise that <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_rotfl.gif' alt='&#61;&#41;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='30' height='18' title='&#61;&#41;&#41;' />   But honestly, Osama set up a base of operations 1st in the Sudan, then in Afghanistan.  Well we had just kicked him out of Afghanistan.  WHere was he going to go??  You can&#8217;t give me this blah blah blah about Saddam not liking Osama, Saddam loved anyone who got away with an attack on America.  We had to attack Iraq, Osama would have set up a base of operations in the western part of Iraq, and it would have taken alot more than what we have lost in this to root that dog out of there. &#8211; Lorica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A MUST read&#8230;.with all links. &#171; Tizona&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/09/bush-lied/comment-page-1/#comment-743499</link>
		<dc:creator>A MUST read&#8230;.with all links. &#171; Tizona&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6041#comment-743499</guid>
		<description>[...] The Anchoress.) More thoughts here: &#8220;What does all this prove? That once again Congressional Democrats are playing politics with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Anchoress.) More thoughts here: &#8220;What does all this prove? That once again Congressional Democrats are playing politics with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.W.</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/09/bush-lied/comment-page-1/#comment-743491</link>
		<dc:creator>A.W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6041#comment-743491</guid>
		<description>Can we question their patriotism now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we question their patriotism now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benning</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/09/bush-lied/comment-page-1/#comment-743488</link>
		<dc:creator>benning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6041#comment-743488</guid>
		<description>All this means is the same old same old. Bush says, &quot;Yes.&quot; The Left says, &quot;No!&quot; Bushs says, &quot;Up!&quot; The Left says, &quot;Down!&quot;

Nothing new here. The Left will lie until the cows come home. And there are enough idiots in America who will believe whatever the Left tells them. And now we have the Obamessiah to be their mouthpiece. Yeesh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this means is the same old same old. Bush says, &#8220;Yes.&#8221; The Left says, &#8220;No!&#8221; Bushs says, &#8220;Up!&#8221; The Left says, &#8220;Down!&#8221;</p>
<p>Nothing new here. The Left will lie until the cows come home. And there are enough idiots in America who will believe whatever the Left tells them. And now we have the Obamessiah to be their mouthpiece. Yeesh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severian</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/09/bush-lied/comment-page-1/#comment-743476</link>
		<dc:creator>Severian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6041#comment-743476</guid>
		<description>This is exactly the same technique that so many in the global warming BS practice. ReakKlimat is particularly bad at this. They never link to the article or paper they are disparaging, instead they tell you what it says and then debunk that. They deliberately mislead and lie about what the paper in questions says, setting up a strawman, and then &quot;debunk&quot; and disparage that, and most people won&#039;t try and find the original paper to read it themselves. Plus they know most of their audience are AGW groupies who couldn&#039;t understand the paper anyway and are just looking for talking points to prop up the alarmist position.

And the sheeple eat it up. We are doomed by the American Idol generations lack of attention span.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly the same technique that so many in the global warming BS practice. ReakKlimat is particularly bad at this. They never link to the article or paper they are disparaging, instead they tell you what it says and then debunk that. They deliberately mislead and lie about what the paper in questions says, setting up a strawman, and then &#8220;debunk&#8221; and disparage that, and most people won&#8217;t try and find the original paper to read it themselves. Plus they know most of their audience are AGW groupies who couldn&#8217;t understand the paper anyway and are just looking for talking points to prop up the alarmist position.</p>
<p>And the sheeple eat it up. We are doomed by the American Idol generations lack of attention span.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/09/bush-lied/comment-page-1/#comment-743475</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6041#comment-743475</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/08/AR2008060801687.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In the&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; report&#039;s final section, the committee takes issue with Bush&#039;s statements about Saddam Hussein&#039;s intentions and what the future might have held. But was that really a question of misrepresenting intelligence, or was it a question of judgment that politicians are expected to make?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Doesn&#039;t this bring up the matter of political judgement as an important factor when selecting a President ?

Let&#039;s see should it be the guy who hung out with the racist preacher for 20 years, the 60&#039;s radical in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/content/publications.php?pub_id=54&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chicago Annenberg Challenge&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ?  Me thinks not.

And thanks for the heads up, Sen. Rockefeller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/08/AR2008060801687.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>In the</strong></a> report&#8217;s final section, the committee takes issue with Bush&#8217;s statements about Saddam Hussein&#8217;s intentions and what the future might have held. But was that really a question of misrepresenting intelligence, or was it a question of judgment that politicians are expected to make?</p></blockquote>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t this bring up the matter of political judgement as an important factor when selecting a President ?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see should it be the guy who hung out with the racist preacher for 20 years, the 60&#8217;s radical in the <a href="http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/content/publications.php?pub_id=54" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>Chicago Annenberg Challenge</strong></a> ?  Me thinks not.</p>
<p>And thanks for the heads up, Sen. Rockefeller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
