<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: District of Columbia v. Heller: Ruling today (UPDATE: SUPREMES RULE IN FAVOR OF GUN OWNERS)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/26/district-of-columbia-v-heller-ruling-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/26/district-of-columbia-v-heller-ruling-today/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: teqjack</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/26/district-of-columbia-v-heller-ruling-today/comment-page-1/#comment-744536</link>
		<dc:creator>teqjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6108#comment-744536</guid>
		<description>OK, 5-4 split on whether to overturn an outright ban in SCOTUS. 
 
BUT! Note 9-0 that gun ownership is an individual right!!! 
 
 :d The dissenters mostly thought the decision should be just on the individual right, with the case returned to lower courts to decide if a ban was too-extreme regulating. :-?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, 5-4 split on whether to overturn an outright ban in SCOTUS. </p>
<p>BUT! Note 9-0 that gun ownership is an individual right!!! </p>
<p> <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_bigsmile.gif' alt='&#58;&#100;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#100;' /> The dissenters mostly thought the decision should be just on the individual right, with the case returned to lower courts to decide if a ban was too-extreme regulating. <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_think.gif' alt='&#58;&#45;&#63;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#45;&#63;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Conservative Reader &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Supreme Court: Guns Still In Vogue</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/26/district-of-columbia-v-heller-ruling-today/comment-page-1/#comment-744532</link>
		<dc:creator>The Conservative Reader &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Supreme Court: Guns Still In Vogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6108#comment-744532</guid>
		<description>[...] conversation at Sister Toldjah, BitsBlog, McGehee, SCOTUSBlog, Michelle Malkin, TownHall, Stop the ACLU, and Hot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] conversation at Sister Toldjah, BitsBlog, McGehee, SCOTUSBlog, Michelle Malkin, TownHall, Stop the ACLU, and Hot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom TB</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/26/district-of-columbia-v-heller-ruling-today/comment-page-1/#comment-744529</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6108#comment-744529</guid>
		<description>Just watch Barry H.O. flip-flop around his previous statements on the Heller case!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just watch Barry H.O. flip-flop around his previous statements on the Heller case!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankhagan.com &#187; Second Amendment: Individual Gun Rights (at least in DC)</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/06/26/district-of-columbia-v-heller-ruling-today/comment-page-1/#comment-744508</link>
		<dc:creator>frankhagan.com &#187; Second Amendment: Individual Gun Rights (at least in DC)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6108#comment-744508</guid>
		<description>[...] collection of quotes from the majority opinion, courtesy of SCOTUS Blog (with a H/T to Sister Toldjah):  &quot;We start therefore with a strong presumption that the Second Amendment right is exercised [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] collection of quotes from the majority opinion, courtesy of SCOTUS Blog (with a H/T to Sister Toldjah):  &#8220;We start therefore with a strong presumption that the Second Amendment right is exercised [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
