Comments on: Why John McCain’s experience as a war veteran matters http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/07/07/why-john-mccains-experience-as-a-war-veteran-matters/ Don't dis or dismiss this miss! Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:15:13 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Lorica http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/07/07/why-john-mccains-experience-as-a-war-veteran-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-745098 Lorica Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:47:22 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6149#comment-745098 Such Hypocracy from this idiotic loser. I cannot not stand Wesley Clark, I didn't like him as a General, and I like him even less now. Has anyone pointed out to Wesley, that in 2004 the only experience he was running on was his experience as an officer in the United States Army. I so hate hypocrites, and stupid hypocrites are even worse. Wesley is such a tool. - Lorica Such Hypocracy from this idiotic loser. I cannot not stand Wesley Clark, I didn’t like him as a General, and I like him even less now. Has anyone pointed out to Wesley, that in 2004 the only experience he was running on was his experience as an officer in the United States Army. I so hate hypocrites, and stupid hypocrites are even worse. Wesley is such a tool. – Lorica

]]> By: jim b http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/07/07/why-john-mccains-experience-as-a-war-veteran-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-745086 jim b Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:19:57 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6149#comment-745086 Wes Clark is a Clinton Lap Dog General. The only reason anyone I know would ever follow Wes Clark is out of idle curiousity. Wes Clark is a Clinton Lap Dog General. The only reason anyone I know would ever follow Wes Clark is out of idle curiousity.

]]> By: Dana http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/07/07/why-john-mccains-experience-as-a-war-veteran-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-745048 Dana Tue, 08 Jul 2008 02:31:25 +0000 http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=6149#comment-745048 The <i>Inquirer</i> is my paper too, but I'm vacationating this week, so I didn't see Mr Farris' column. The <i>Inquirer</i> has far more liberal columnists than conservatives ones, but they aren't all bad. The editors, who endorsed Barack Hussein Obama before the Super Tuesday primaries, still took Mr Obama to task for using General Clark as a surrogate to attack Mr McCain. The Inquirer is my paper too, but I’m vacationating this week, so I didn’t see Mr Farris’ column.

The Inquirer has far more liberal columnists than conservatives ones, but they aren’t all bad. The editors, who endorsed Barack Hussein Obama before the Super Tuesday primaries, still took Mr Obama to task for using General Clark as a surrogate to attack Mr McCain.

]]>