Comments on: Hannity and Colmes tonight

By: Lorica

Lorica — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:01:04 +0000

Awwwww was wittle Barry hoping to disenfranchise the Evangelicals with his leak of Bristol’s pregnancy?? Wittle Barry should know that many of us think he is a forerunner of the anti-christ so he would do himself well to keep quiet. – Lorica

By: Trish

Trish — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:58:03 +0000

It’s not surprising that Evangelicals are now being attacked for “hypocracy” (yes, they don’t even know how to spell it), when in fact Evangelicals are being true to their principles and their faith.

Christianity isn’t about never sinning. It’s about repentance and forgiveness. Perhaps this will be an opportunity for people to have a real understanding of what the Christian message is.

By: Steve Skubinna

Steve Skubinna — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:13:44 +0000

Hannity and Colmes must have a gentlemen’s agreement not to attack each other directly. Sure, there’s plenty of partisan sniping and pointed questioning, but never have I seen one address a statement of the other, really tear it down and dissect it, despite so many opportunities for them to do so. They always discuss what other people have said and argue about that.

By: Neo

Neo — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:55:53 +0000

Before, they were excited about her, with the Down syndrome baby," conservative, anti-tax activist Grover Norquist said. "But now with this, they are over the moon. It reinforces the fact that this family lives its pro-life values."

I guess just maybe Obama won't do so good with Evangelicals after all. This makes it apparent why Obama is upset, as he was hoping to split the vote.

By: Anthony (Los Angeles)

Anthony (Los Angeles) — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:56:10 +0000

Hannity annoys the heck out of me, but Colmes really scrapes the bottom of the barrel.