<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/11/19/quote-of-the-day-14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/11/19/quote-of-the-day-14/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:23:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: janus</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/11/19/quote-of-the-day-14/comment-page-1/#comment-752442</link>
		<dc:creator>janus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=8505#comment-752442</guid>
		<description>The first thing that i think about here is Parker&#039;s contention the Republican Party is erring by placing all it&#039;s eggs in the Evangelical basket. 

Is she on to something?

 Demographics so highlight a problem for Republicans:  In many studies about a quarter of voters identified themselves as Evangelical Protestants and about two thirds of evangelicals identify themselves as Republicans.

So, if two thirds of Evangelicals, totaling about 15% of all voters, identify themselves as Republicans and 25% of all voters identify themselves as Republicans, that means Evangelicals represent about 60+% of the Republican Party. 

If the Republicans have any hopes of reemerging, and not being known as just the &quot;party of Evangelicals&quot;, they will have to figure out a way to get more moderate voters.

As I see it, she&#039;s on to something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first thing that i think about here is Parker&#8217;s contention the Republican Party is erring by placing all it&#8217;s eggs in the Evangelical basket. </p>
<p>Is she on to something?</p>
<p> Demographics so highlight a problem for Republicans:  In many studies about a quarter of voters identified themselves as Evangelical Protestants and about two thirds of evangelicals identify themselves as Republicans.</p>
<p>So, if two thirds of Evangelicals, totaling about 15% of all voters, identify themselves as Republicans and 25% of all voters identify themselves as Republicans, that means Evangelicals represent about 60+% of the Republican Party. </p>
<p>If the Republicans have any hopes of reemerging, and not being known as just the &#8220;party of Evangelicals&#8221;, they will have to figure out a way to get more moderate voters.</p>
<p>As I see it, she&#8217;s on to something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trish</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/11/19/quote-of-the-day-14/comment-page-1/#comment-752436</link>
		<dc:creator>Trish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=8505#comment-752436</guid>
		<description>I stopped taking Parker seriously the day she wrote, &quot;No one gets an abortion for fun.&quot;
93% of all abortions are performed for fun:  sex without responsibility.  Only 7% (this is an old figure; it may have changed) are performed for ANY other reason--rape, incest or medical reasons.  

Parker is a bad joke on all of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stopped taking Parker seriously the day she wrote, &#8220;No one gets an abortion for fun.&#8221;<br />
93% of all abortions are performed for fun:  sex without responsibility.  Only 7% (this is an old figure; it may have changed) are performed for ANY other reason&#8211;rape, incest or medical reasons.  </p>
<p>Parker is a bad joke on all of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Skubinna</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/11/19/quote-of-the-day-14/comment-page-1/#comment-752424</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Skubinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=8505#comment-752424</guid>
		<description>To me the most obnoxious aspect of Parker&#039;s ultra-cute &quot;Dowd Lite&quot; is the nasty bigotry she directs at people of faith.

No, not &quot;people of faith,&quot; just Christians.  She isn&#039;t being outspoken, bravely addressing the dangerous truth, she&#039;s being a nasty sneering Eastern Establishment elitist taking a shot at Jesusland.  That kind of crap we absolutely don&#039;t need in the party, so she can go pound sand.

Leave the viciousness to the Kos Kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me the most obnoxious aspect of Parker&#8217;s ultra-cute &#8220;Dowd Lite&#8221; is the nasty bigotry she directs at people of faith.</p>
<p>No, not &#8220;people of faith,&#8221; just Christians.  She isn&#8217;t being outspoken, bravely addressing the dangerous truth, she&#8217;s being a nasty sneering Eastern Establishment elitist taking a shot at Jesusland.  That kind of crap we absolutely don&#8217;t need in the party, so she can go pound sand.</p>
<p>Leave the viciousness to the Kos Kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/11/19/quote-of-the-day-14/comment-page-1/#comment-752420</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=8505#comment-752420</guid>
		<description>One thing I thought most conservative women would agree on is solidarity in sisterhood. Parker broke ranks. Not a good move on her part. We&#039;ll survive without her, but will she without us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I thought most conservative women would agree on is solidarity in sisterhood. Parker broke ranks. Not a good move on her part. We&#8217;ll survive without her, but will she without us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiasedGirl</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/11/19/quote-of-the-day-14/comment-page-1/#comment-752419</link>
		<dc:creator>BiasedGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=8505#comment-752419</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m loved Jonah Goldberg right now. Talk about someone &#039;saying what needs to be said&#039;! Your take on what turned this election is spot on. Many factors played into the Obama win, but it wasn&#039;t because the GOP was too conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m loved Jonah Goldberg right now. Talk about someone &#8217;saying what needs to be said&#8217;! Your take on what turned this election is spot on. Many factors played into the Obama win, but it wasn&#8217;t because the GOP was too conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Steel</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/11/19/quote-of-the-day-14/comment-page-1/#comment-752418</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Steel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=8505#comment-752418</guid>
		<description>Kathleen Parker doesn&#039;t need to switch parties, she needs to just stop writing for awhile.  She&#039;s gotten plain weird.  Your point about Obama supporters voting against gay and lesbian marriage is spot on, ST.  You don&#039;t have to be religious to be against gay and lesbian marriage.  You can feel that marriage is between a man and woman.  Plain and simple.  With no religion attached.

I&#039;m an agnostic.  But I never EVER disrespect those of faith.  Because I&#039;ve seen how deep that faith goes.  And to disrespect that is just terrible.

Those on the left that are &quot;loving them some K-Parker&quot; because of her recent screed are showing their disrespect of those of faith.  &#039;Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen Parker doesn&#8217;t need to switch parties, she needs to just stop writing for awhile.  She&#8217;s gotten plain weird.  Your point about Obama supporters voting against gay and lesbian marriage is spot on, ST.  You don&#8217;t have to be religious to be against gay and lesbian marriage.  You can feel that marriage is between a man and woman.  Plain and simple.  With no religion attached.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an agnostic.  But I never EVER disrespect those of faith.  Because I&#8217;ve seen how deep that faith goes.  And to disrespect that is just terrible.</p>
<p>Those on the left that are &#8220;loving them some K-Parker&#8221; because of her recent screed are showing their disrespect of those of faith.  &#8216;Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2008/11/19/quote-of-the-day-14/comment-page-1/#comment-752415</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=8505#comment-752415</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, i find myself sitting here shaking my head in agreement with you as i read this.  Seems Ms. Parker needs to switch parties :-?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, i find myself sitting here shaking my head in agreement with you as i read this.  Seems Ms. Parker needs to switch parties <img src='http://sistertoldjah.com/smilies/yahoo_think.gif' alt='&#58;&#45;&#63;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#45;&#63;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
