Lorica, what it makes her is exactly as believable as the prez she’s undoubtedly in love with.

Well Natalie after a few months of trying to justify what she said, finally apologized to President Bush, who accepted. When things didn’t turn around for her financially, she got mad and eventually took back her apology telling the world that she didn’t mean it at the time she gave it. Which makes her what exactly??

As far as this topic goes. Waxman is only saying this garbage to get attention. All this is about his need for attention. Look at Me, I am Henry Waxman a Democrat, and I need some attention. Such a whiney little boy.

Now can we get back to the Michael Jackson coverage?? He still might rise from the grave, don’t cha know. – Lorica

On topic: Rep. Waxman is just trying to drum up bipartisan support for his favored legislation. “Reaching across the aisle” doesn’t mean the same thing to everyone. To Waxman, evidentally it means reaching across the aisle to pummel those kids who won’t give up their lunch money.

Consensus = Patriotism = Peace.

for no apparent reason,

Jeanne, you call 500,000 people dying to this man’s whims “for no apparent reason”?? The use of Chemical Weapons, a Weapon of Mass Destruction, on the civilian population of Iraq “for no apparent reason”?? The attack of 5 of it’s neighboring states, “no apparent reason”?? Breaking of the surrender agreement, “no apparent reason”?? Bribery, rape, murder, harboring terrorists, all “no apparent reasons”??? How blind are you, that is my question??

Look what happened to Natalie Maines.

You mean the same Natalie Maines who apologized for her stupid comment?? Did Bush have ANYTHING to do with the backlash that came upon her for saying what she said?? No Jeanne, he did not, what happened is, that her customers, were unhappy with supporting someone, who only wanted to cater to stupid opinion to gather more money, we call that greed, and didn’t give a squat about them. Same thing happens in the world everyday. She is a business, and when her customers decided they didn’t want to fund her radical viewpoints they stopped supporting it. On that day, and with that comment Natalie showed the real person she is, and people decided they did not want to support it any longer. Talk about flawed logic. You are willing to take away the right of the people to voice their unhappiness, but yet want to blame someone else for the reason the people are unhappy. Does that actually make sense to you?? – Lorica

The first power generating nuke reactor
Gone sane: Dr. Sanity goes offline
G8 promises to control world temperature. Ya can’t make this stuff up.
Your mammogram by the lowest bidder
The second time we agree with the O: time to get rid of fa…

One wonders how in the name of Heaven His Hollowness could ever have been elected, until one considers the likes of Waxman, Pelosi, Schumer, Kennedy, Reid, etc., etc., and realizes they’ve all had multiple terms. Their collective economic I.Q. might equal the pinhead hat sizes they wear. With an informed and gullible electorate like that what else can one expect?

I rarely waste time on tepidness, but I can’t let this one go. If you had listened to what that “certain conservative political commentator” actually said, or better yet, had taken the time to research it on the web, you might have discovered that he stated very clearly that he did not want the president to fail, he wanted his socialist policies to fail. You know, the ones that punish producers and reward failures?

“Moderate” is just another word that means “I don’t have the guts to make a decision and stand by it until I see which way the wind’s blowing.”