State Department: “Get your kids out of Monterrey”

Posted by: Phineas on September 22, 2010 at 2:00 pm

The security situation in northern Mexico continues to worsen as an attempted kidnapping sparks a warning for Americans living in Monterrey and an order from the State Department: Get your children out.

Affluent Americans living in Monterrey became extremely worried in late August that they were in danger after a gun battle erupted in front of the American School Foundation, which many children of American as well as Mexican business executives attend. The firefight took place between bodyguards working for the Mexican beverage company Femsa SAB de CV and cartel attackers, who were apparently attempting to kidnap young relatives of a high-level company employee. In the course of the ensuing battle, two bodyguards were killed and two others captured. Flying bullets caused students in the school to scramble for shelter in the school cafeteria.

U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Charles Pascual then cautioned employees of the Monterrey consulate to keep their children home, “while we assess the risks and what measures can be taken to reduce it (sic.)” Pascual gave that recommendation even though there was no hard evidence that the children of consular personnel had been targeted.Following the incident, the U.S. consulate in Monterrey also posted an advisory on its website, directed to Americans living in the area. “The sharp increase in kidnapping incidents in the Monterrey area, and this event in particular, present a very high risk to the families of U.S. citizens,” the message read.

Three days later, the State Department escalated its warnings and issued a stunning edict. “U.S. government personnel from the consulate general are not permitted to keep their minor dependents in Monterrey,” a U.S. Embassy spokesman stated. “As of September 10, no minor dependents, no children of U.S. government employees will be permitted in Monterrey.” That was the kind of restriction, designating the Monterrey consulate a “partially unaccompanied post” for U.S. diplomats, is normally imposed only in war zones and other extremely high-risk areas. It underscored just how seriously the State Department took the surge in fighting and the extent of the kidnapping danger.

While the State Department travel warning couches it in much softer language, the message is clear: the cartel wars have made previously safe Monterrey too risky.

And it’s not just the children of diplomats: Caterpillar has told its executives to move their families out of the city, and well-off Mexicans are doing the same. The lack of security was accentuated by the discovery of a mass grave containing the bodies of what are assumed to be cartel victims, and the kidnapping and murder of the mayor of a neighboring town.

Mexico’s third-largest city and an economic powerhouse, the descent of Monterrey into “cartel chaos” would be devastating to Mexico. With the growing inability of local authorities to provide security in such an important city, the reflex reaction would be to “send in the Army.” But that hasn’t worked out so well in other Mexican border cities. In fact, in many cases, the Mexican Army is part of the problem.

Take a look at this map:

(Google map link)

Monterrey is dead center. To the west is Torreón, while to the east is Reynosa, both of which I’ve written about before. North lies Nuevo Laredo, where things have become so rough that they spurred crazy rumors about ranch takeovers in Texas. And we’ve all heard about the problems in places farther west, such as Juarez and Tijuana.

It’s plain that Mexico has more than just an organized crime problem in its northern territories: there is a growing challenge to the government’s authority there. While I don’t believe there’s any realistic danger of a state failure in Mexico City, it is not inconceivable that Mexican state and federal authorities might find it easier to throw up their hands and surrender de facto control of the area to the cartels, much as Colombia did with the FARC in the 1990s. The risk of that and the potential threats it would hold for our border regions makes Mexico’s internal security a vital interest for our national security.

More than just increasing border security itself (and worthwhile as that is), the Obama administration* needs to intensify cooperation with Mexico to bolster its capacity and resolve to restore its crumbling writ in its northern states. Perhaps some variant of the highly successful Plan Colombia would work. Just as important, the Mexican government** has to be brutally honest with itself and its people about the problems they face; no more trying to distract attention by lecturing us over a minor state immigration law. Their current efforts are a failure; no progress has been made. It’s time for both countries to admit there’s a serious problem and deal with it before it goes critical.

*More like “the next administration.

**Call me a cynic, but I have doubts Calderon has it in him to do this.

(Crossposted at Public Secrets)

RSS feed for comments on this post.

6 Responses to “State Department: “Get your kids out of Monterrey””

Comments

  1. camojack says:

    Call me a cynic, but I have doubts Calderon has it in him to do this.”

    ¿El señor no tiene bastante cojones?

  2. Phineas says:

    That’s “El Señor Presidente…” to you, gringo.

    And you’re right. ;)

  3. Jo says:

    Who would go to Mexico with this unchecked violence and actual advice from the so-called Mexican government to just leave? It sounds like the lawless wild west down there. American citizens should boycott Mexico–all of it, resorts most especially. When they lose every dollar they receive from tourism, they might start to wake up and acknowledge there is a problem they need to clean up.

  4. Kate says:

    The idea that this was something that happened without notice is completely false. These cartels TARGET their victims and include families. They carefully watch and KNOW your travel patterns. They have the audacity to call the family member who has the most cash first with veiled threats and the wise person carefully dodges that call and gets his family out of harms way. The State Department had to know there was going to be problems with any school where there are well to do Mexicans or American children. They are being watched. This bold attack is putting teeth behind their threats now. Anyone who believes this will all just blow over is kidding themselves and putting more people in harms way.

    As I said in many post before, this is the biggest problem in Mexico and it is why so many make that illegal trip across the border and try to get their families out too. Why should American standby when we see this all happening right before our eyes? Where is a cogent plan on how to deal with a rouge state in the making?

  5. Carlos says:

    The Federales haven’t “lost” control – they never in fact had it because of the rampant government-approved graft throughout the country.

    And Kate, I think you meant “rogue” state, not “rouge”, although it has been a red (in the traditional socialist meaning) state for a long time.

    And IMHO, just as soon as one or more of those cartel weasels comes across the border (or fires purposely across the border), our military should take that as an act of war, declare war on Mexico and go in and clean up the entire border, chasing the bad guys across their southern border if necessary. The Mexican government would scream to high heaven and the U.N. would, too, but (even though Duh-1 doesn’t believe or understand it) the primary purpose of our government is to protect our citizens, not theirs. Actually, with up to 30 million of their citizens here illegally already, we’ve perfect legal justification to militarily invade their country already.

  6. Kate says:

    LOL…is my face rouge!

    Would annexing Mexico be helpful?