E-Mail 'Quote of the Day: "Abortion can be a good, moral decision, in and of itself"' To A Friend

Email a copy of 'Quote of the Day: "Abortion can be a good, moral decision, in and of itself"' to a friend

Loading ...

13 Responses to "Quote of the Day: “Abortion can be a good, moral decision, in and of itself”"

Rhymes With Right says:

March 30, 2011 at 7:26 pm

The following statement is equally true — “Killing an abortionist can be a good, moral decision, in and of itself.”
Alex says:

March 30, 2011 at 7:57 pm

When does a baby become a baby? When the heart starts to beat? Why is that a better measure than some other sort of measure?

Clearly 10 minutes after conception there is no baby, and clearly 10 minutes before birth there is a baby; the question is where to draw the line, or whether a line can be drawn at all.
Old Goat says:

March 30, 2011 at 7:58 pm

I’m just guessing here, but I tend to doubt that the child who is murdered doesn’t exactly think there is much “value” to it.
Neo says:

March 30, 2011 at 9:26 pm

I’m always amazed that these folks never talk about when a “choice: isn’t a choice at all.
The young woman pressured by her “mate” or parents or friends to “do the right thing” is no “choice”
Marilyn says:

March 30, 2011 at 9:54 pm

Clearly 10 minutes after conception there is no baby, and clearly 10 minutes before birth there is a baby; the question is where to draw the line, or whether a line can be drawn at all.Clearly 10 minutes after conception there is no baby, and clearly 10 minutes before birth there is a baby; the question is where to draw the line, or whether a line can be drawn at all.

Alex,

From the moment of conception the cells form a completely unique genetic individual. Some do not see the early entity as a “person” because it does not have the visible anatomy that makes us instantly recognize “one of us”, but the individual in the womb is as distinctly human as you and I. All of the DNA that makes that person who they are (or who they will be!) is present.

I used to be rabidly pro-choice, but I also wrestled with the question of where to draw the line. I realized that no line can be drawn.

Pro-abortionists will say “it’s not a baby, it’s a potential baby”.

Well, a 3-month old is not a 1-year old but is a potential one-year old unless someone interrupts. A one-year old is not a two-year old, it is a potential two-year old unless someone interrupts its progress.

The unborn WILL become a fully formed human unless someone interrupts its progress.

The time to decide not to mother is before having sex. It’s not that hard to prevent pregnancy.
Carlos says:

March 31, 2011 at 2:17 am

I wonder if I’ll ever cease to be amazed by the way our language is contorted by the left to conform to their personal world view?

Up is down, black is white, good is evil, evil is good, and abortion is “a good, moral decision”.

I wonder if they keep a scorecard to keep track of all the words and phrases they tangle into unrecognizable garbage?
Kate says:

March 31, 2011 at 7:36 am

It’s a good moral decision if YOU benefit from it…that’s the message. There are no ground rules, no final judgement, nothing about God, creation/procreation, just ME. I think you nailed this one Sister!

It’s just now that the Planned Parenthood funding is in question that this warm and fuzzy tripe comes out….who do they think they are fooling? Another generation in the dumpster that’s to the caring folks at PP.

If peope would look at the history of PP they would know that it was never about “the health of the woman”.
bill glass says:

March 31, 2011 at 10:11 am

#6 Carlos – 110% dead on, couldn’t agree more. Bringing what you said into common parlance would be a great eye opener and public service. Even empty-headed leftists (dims) followers would grasp that changing words and meanings is absolutely a big brother method. Problem with abortion supporters is that many have had friends, sisters, cousins, roommates etc, have this abhorrent procedure, and they will rarely take a stand against this “easy” remedy. Even though it might bother then personally, they’ll find it real hard to voice opposition.
Old Goat says:

March 31, 2011 at 10:34 am

Just saw a video about Planned Parenthood regarding mammograms. After all, that is one of the big reasons that RINOs are hesitating to defund them. It may be just a select number of cities or PP operations that are shown in it, but not one did mammograms. Not one. All of them said there were other agencies to go to, as they (PP) were a basically a surgical facility.

I’m thinking that PP really needs to have the light of an investigation shined on them. Show each one, the number of ~~murders~~ abortion choices that are made in them per year, the consultation regarding specific health type issues per year, and so on.

This is something that they would have on record unless they are doing a cover up.
Paul says:

March 31, 2011 at 11:18 am

How can killing be moral ? Please tell me someone…
PE says:

March 31, 2011 at 11:25 am

Nothing personal kid. I just don’t want the hassle of having you around.
Marilyn says:

March 31, 2011 at 5:42 pm

#10 Paul–

Depends on your ethical point of view. The utilitarians (think Jeremy Bentham, John Stewart Mill) would say it is perfectly moral because the abortion serves the “greater good”, the happiness and well-being of the mother.

Or, as Mr. Spock said as he sacrificed himself for the Enterprise…”the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one”.

Not saying I agree. I think abortion is wrong. But it is very difficult to convince people who base decisions on utilitarian values.
Carlos says:

April 1, 2011 at 8:29 pm

To begin with, leftists/statists have no morals because, to them, there is no absolute right or absolute wrong; it is all relative.

Therefore, when they speak of “ethics” they speak nonsensicle drivel because ethics is the discipline of morality. Since there is no morality, there can be no ethics.

They would argue that, but when all the smoke is cleared and bottom lines are drawn, that’s what it amounts to.

Ya can’t win an argument about morals or ethics with a relativist. You might as well be trying to nail jello to a wall.

Comments are closed.