E-Mail 'President Obama's war on religious freedoms provokes massive backlash' To A Friend

Email a copy of 'President Obama's war on religious freedoms provokes massive backlash' to a friend

Loading ...

10 Responses to "President Obama’s war on religious freedoms provokes massive backlash"

gary thompson says:

February 9, 2012 at 10:59 pm

I too have wondered why Obama would make such a politically volatile move in an election year. Then it hit me. He’s already written off the white-working class vote and doesn’t bother with them. He must have written off the right wing religious vote so why not do something to help appease his core left support? make church-based organizations hand out condoms! Yes, they’ll love it!
Drew the Infidel says:

February 10, 2012 at 5:46 am

By now, each and everybody has figured out why the Islamists here are not tampered with in this fashion: they already have murder as an article of faith.
PART I: Church, State, Morals, Pontificating, Religious Freedom, & Another Fine Mess | The Pink Flamingo says:

February 10, 2012 at 6:13 am

[…] shoved down my throat. You must believe one way or another. It is either or, no shades of gray, and forget any resemblance to kindness, human decency, tolerance, and grown-up behavior. Our politicians on both sides of the […]
Zippy says:

February 10, 2012 at 8:18 am

Birth Control pills are not a right but an elective medication (i.e. choice). To force a religious institution who does not believe in such is a crime against said institution forced to adhere to such policy. Naturally, there are incidence where birth control pills are necessary to regulate or lay dormant a disease process, which is another story. In such cases, a letter of necessity to said insurance would suffice.

He just rolls along and does whatever the F he wants. Hateful P.O.S. that he is.
Zippy says:

February 10, 2012 at 8:31 am

The intended group in focus will not be the group who benefits from said policy. That group will continue to live in the welfare state of producing children as a lifestyle, which we, the taxpaying, working public will be forced to provide for.
MissJean says:

February 10, 2012 at 12:11 pm

The comments at the Telegraph and, unfortunately, many sites with a majority of American readers miss the point: The Constitution restricts the government and guarantees freedom of religion. Instead, they’re trying to make it – just like Sibelius, et al – a referendum on a nonexistent “right” to birth control. A majority of Americans may scoff at the Catholic Church’s views, but that doesn’t add any credibility to the unconstitutional restrictions.

Frankly, this administration already showed that they don’t care about constitutions. Do you remember the Honduran “coupe” a while back? Their president was caught in a case of voting fraud (importing ballots printed in another country!) and was escorted from the country by the military. Our government defined it as a military coupe and cut trade etc. until Honduras allowed their exiled ex-president to return. But very few news outlets pointed out something very obvious to people in Honduras: The military was carrying out the punishment decided upon by their Supreme Court.
Carlos says:

February 10, 2012 at 10:54 pm

I have diabetes, and just like pregnacy for a woman my diabetes is a result of choices I made.

Shouldn’t the government be paying for everything related to my diabetes, including a permanent club membership and for the gas it takes to get there?

And what about the “special” foods I have to eat? They cost more than “regular” foods, so shouldn’t the government be paying for that, too?

The sexist feminazi argument doesn’t hold water. This is a case of the government usurping rights guaranteed in the Constitution that they so blithely ignore, and no amount of whining, screeching or ad hominem attacks will change the fact that the Constitution means nothing to this administration but even less to the socialists that support Duh-1 and his thugs.
Carlos says:

February 11, 2012 at 2:23 am

One more thing. Obama’s announcement today underscores a basic lack of understanding of the economy, ANY economy, and that is that there is no such thing as “free.”

Does he really believe insurance companies will pay for contraceptive and abortion services for purely altruistic reasons? Sure he does, and probably believes a vegematic can fly him to the moon, too, and that’s why he’s cutting the space program!

The guy is a fool, and the world is full of fools, but he’s a dangerous one.
Cathy Robinson says:

February 11, 2012 at 10:58 am

John Kerry has been interdicted from receiving Communion. People who support the murder of innocents are soulless.
Neo says:

February 11, 2012 at 5:35 pm

If I was into conspiracies I would have to wonder if Barack Obama wasn’t a real life “Dave.”
Between the teleprompter, the late night decisions “all by himself” (nudge nudge wink wink, know what I mean, say no more), and these moments of being unprepared (after a year to prepare), you really have to wonder if Axelrod and Jarrett haven’t stuffed a stick up his butt and made him their ~~slave~~ puppet.

Comments are closed.