Great moments in Smart Power diplomacy: slapping your allies edition

Posted by: Phineas on April 17, 2012 at 1:52 pm

**Posted by Phineas

Among the many embarrassing moments for the Obama administration (1) at the recent Summit of the Americas, the real standout has to be when the President of the United States showed utter, blithering ignorance of geography while at the same time sticking a shiv into one of our closest, oldest allies.

At a press conference, when asked about Argentine claims (2) to the Falkland Islands (part of the UK for nearly 200 years), our worldly-wise president tried to show how multicultural he is by referring to the islands by their Spanish name, “Las Malvinas.”

Except, he couldn’t keep it straight, calling them instead “The Maldives,” a group of islands in the Indian Ocean 8,000 miles away.

D’oh!

Okay, okay. So it’s a relatively petty point, and he was without his binky teleprompter. But we’ve been told time and again what a brilliant man he is, so don’t you think he could keep the names straight in a dispute involving an ally and an important regional actor? One that may break out in war? The press would have shown Bush no mercy, so, all’s fair. Obama owns this egg-on-the-face moment.

But, much more important than his latest impression of Norm Crosby, Obama’s proclamation of neutrality in the Falklands dispute was yet another slap in the face of one of our most important and trusted allies. As UK journalist Toby Harnden wrote:

But the bigger issue is that the Falkland Islands are a British Overseas Territory. This time 30 years ago, a British task force was en route to retake the islands after they had been invaded by Argentina. The death toll of that war included 255 British troops.

(…)

To spell it out: Obama is “neutral” over the sovereignty of islands that British troops, with American support, fought and died for at a time when British troops are fighting and dying alongside their American comrades in Afghanistan.

Not only that, Obama thinks that the term “Malvinas” is just as valid as the correct name on all the maps: the Falklands. Except that he cannot read his briefing notes carefully enough even to get the incorrect name right, mixing up the Malvinas with the Maldives.

What a way to treat the foremost ally of the United States.

The British also supported us in both Gulf Wars and have been stalwarts in the fight against al Qaeda globally. Given the choice between supporting Her Majesty’s Government in defense in the right of Falklanders to self-determination, on the one hand, and giving de facto support to the gangster-government of Argentine president Cristina Kirchner on the other, well, there is no choice, and the Obama-Clinton “evenhanded neutrality” is a disgrace.

Hell of a way to treat an ally, indeed.

LINKS: More from Fausta; Nile Gardiner wonders (again) if this is the thanks Britain gets. He also argues that Secretary Clinton is becoming an embarrassment. (“Becoming,” Nile? Try the past tense.) The Diplomad recounts earlier sorry moments in Obama’s Latin American diplomacy and calls this latest summit “a disaster.”

Footnotes:
(1) The Secretary of State partying the night away. Secret Service Agents Gone Wild.
(2) Which are about as legitimate as my claim to the throne of the Tsars.

(Crossposted at Public Secrets)

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

9 Responses to “Great moments in Smart Power diplomacy: slapping your allies edition”

Comments

  1. Neo says:

    For the humour-impaired Progressives:

    Yesterday Dan Quayle addressed the Summit of the Americas in Colombia and spoke about the conflict between the United Kingdom and Argentina over the Falklands. Quayle seemed to tilt toward Argentina by calling the islands the “Malvinas” rather than the Falklands, which Argentina insists is their proper name.
    Only Quayle didn’t say Malvinas, he said Maldives–an entirely different group of islands located thousands of miles from the Falklands in the Indian Ocean.

    The PunchLine: it was Barack Obama not Dan Quayle

  2. G. says:

    Most sane people who witness the idiocy of our “beloved Dear Leader” and his coterie of communists, socialists, leftists, druggies, liars, tax cheats, ad nauseum understand that he is merely a puppet; a USA hating, ally betraying, race baiting, class riot inciting failure and total POS. We merely shrug off his latest idiocy while vowing: ABO (anybody but 0bama)in November. Just my 0.02c.

  3. mike191 says:

    Paging David Brooks: The man with an impeccable crease in his pants is lost without his teleprompter.Moreover,his hubris trumps common sense preperation,”..I have a gift Harry..”is in reality a small, tiny person, not fit to be President44.

  4. Great White Rat says:

    Come on now, Phineas, let’s be reasonable. If Obama doesn’t know how many states there are in the USA, how on earth could anyone expect him to know the difference between islands in the South Atlantic Ocean and islands in the Indian Ocean? Al Gore tells us they’re all going to be underwater soon anyway, so who cares? OK, so geography isn’t Obama’s strongest subject. So what?

    (Neither is math. Or science. Or economics. Or history. But I digress….)

    Anyhoo, let it not be said that the left-wing media missed this opportunity to use this incident to mock….George Bush. Yep, no lie. Obama displays weapons-grade ignorance, and at least one left-wing paper has to bring Bush into it. Check the headline at the Telegraph in London:

    Barack Obama made an uncharacteristic error, more akin to those of his predecessor George W Bush, by referring to the Falkland Islands as the Maldives.

    Uncharacteristic? Have they been paying any kind of attention the past three years, or have the writers there been busy studying the Austrian language?

  5. Great White Rat says:

    in a dispute involving an ally and an important regional actor?

    There’s your problem, Phineas. Obama thinks of the socialist thug regime in Buenos Aires as an ally, granted, but who’s supposed to be the “important regional actor?”

  6. the result of smart dipolomacy has been that every regime change has resulted in a government more hostile to the united states. just what hillary the marxist and the myth wanted.

  7. AZRon says:

    Slightly off track, but I love that you used a reference to Norm Crosby. How fitting. While Norm made me laugh with his intentional language butchery, Obama makes me cringe everytime he opens his mouth and tries to sound like a leader.

  8. Drew the Infidel says:

    I still haven’t gotten over the red carpet treatment for the Chinese president at the WH while Benjamin Netanyahu is forced to use the service entrance.