Favorite #UAWOW – North Carolina rally sign: “This Slut Votes” (PLUS: VIDEO)

Posted by: ST on April 30, 2012 at 7:25 pm

North Carolina’s participation in the national “United Against the War On Women” day in Raleigh on Saturday was sparsely attended – only about 100 or so took part, according to the Raleigh News and Observer – but that still didn’t keep the creative juices of those who did attend from flowing. Here’s my favorite sign so far:

This slut votes

Photo courtesy of the UAWOW - NC Group.

There was someone else at the rally with a “slut” sign – a guy, in fact – but I can’t tell what the sign reads. You can view more photos here. Occupy NC State has video from the rally:



Video streaming by Ustream

Never have understood why “feminists” want to “take back” the word “slut” from people who have “misused” it. It’s a pretty disgusting way to refer to someone no matter who is using it – or why.

In related news, fascistic “feminists” have been waging another war of sorts, this time against conservative women who don’t fall in line with their “group-think” mentality. Now, this isn’t anything new – “feminists” have wanted to shut us up for decades, but some took to to a whole new level the last few weeks by engaging in falsely “blocking and reporting” Twitter users for spam. If enough people report a user for “spam”, Twitter will suspend it automatically until further notice, effectively silencing an account until it either comes back up or the user temporarily starts a new one. Michelle Malkin’s Twitchy site has the details on this disturbing trend.

I should note, for the record, that yours truly was right in the thick of this as I and many of my followers were directly targeted for “monitoring” via a hit list started by “@FeminaziSlut” and promoted by a “Stop Rush” militant who used to go by the name “@subculturestuff” but who has since changed her name and password protected her Twitter account to keep people from witnessing her dictator-esque tactics. The list was supposedly started in response to a NON-EXISTENT “campaign” that I did (not) start to try and get “feminists” suspended from Twitter. Essentially what sub and “Nazi” did was to create a strawman out of thin air and generate a “campaign” against it by targeting both me and my readers, alleging I have a “Twitter army” (I do not). Some actually got suspended (I heard a few were allegedly reported to the FBI), but Twitter is slowly bringing some of them (and others unrelated to this orchestrated attack) back, thanks in part to the widespread outrage over the deliberate targeting of @ChrisLoesch last night by far leftists who repeatedly took his account down (reporting it for spam) every time it came back up.

As many of us have said before, when someone online annoys you, you can block them and set it to where you don’t see what they have to say whether or not it’s directed to you or anyone else. The “spam” feature on Twitter is not there for people just to report people they disagree with, but that’s what liberals have been using it for, excessively over the last few weeks – and the routine misuse of this feature (a TOS violation) actually goes back months.

Some people might find this petty and “not a big deal in the scheme of things” but if you think about how Twitter and other social media platforms have changed the way information is distributed and discussed, it’s a pretty big deal – and the far leftists who have engaged in this war on the speech of conservatives who disagree with them know it. That’s why they do it. In their pathetic little worlds, dissent is NOT patriotic – especially if you are a conservative who doesn’t buy into their “victimhood” mentality. For radical liberals, the response to disagreement is to shut conservatives down by any means necessary, effectively choking their voices on one of the most widely used social media platforms in the world. To do so – period – is chilling, but especially during an election year when it is so important to make your voices heard and heard often.

Unfortunately, the left is just getting warmed up with their game-playing and manipulation this general election season. Look for it to get much, much worse.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

10 Responses to “Favorite #UAWOW – North Carolina rally sign: “This Slut Votes” (PLUS: VIDEO)”

Comments

  1. Go Sister Toldjah! It’s been apparent for years that the left does not like free speech at all and is completely intolerant with any views that do not align with their own. This episode is only one more example.

  2. BeeKay says:

    When it comes to how women are perceived, compare leftwingwackoism to the Papal encyclical “Dignitatis Mulieribus” (Of the dignity of Women.

    Complete polar opposites.

    The Catholic Church teaches about the inherent dignity of women. Leftwingwackoism sees them as sex objects with zero dignity.

  3. Carlos says:

    I’m sure she does vote. And her votes just HAVE to be as informed as her attitudes on propriety, modesty and the social graces. Her posture is a piece of work, too.

    And remember, folks, such language is the sole province of the tolerant left, for use exclusively when talking about women who have left the plantation/reservation because they one day woke up to the fact that the only time they will be less honored is when sharia law is imposed.

    And yes, Mu, ol’ buddy, that was an intentional slam.

  4. PE says:

    Sluts, thugs, thieves and misguided morons. Put them all together and you have one helluva party of evil.

  5. TexasMom2012 says:

    But but but, diversity… Inclusiveness… Fairness… But but but Oh, only for our lockstep agenda… Conservative women are traitors to the cause! LOL

  6. Xrlq says:

    Never have understood why “feminists” want to “take back” the word “slut” from people who have “misused” it. It’s a pretty disgusting way to refer to someone no matter who is using it – or why.

    I think the idea is to neutralize a hurtful word by claiming it as their own, complete with a new, non-offensive definition. Now “slut” no longer implies promiscuity, just a willingness to dress the part for a day (and then only for a cause). But while a few self-proclaimed “sluts” now eagerly embrace the term in public, most other women hear the word and cringe, while men clam up. We see the same thing with some blacks who embrace the n-word; hoping to defang that hurtful slur, all they end up accomplishing is to offend other blacks while confusing whites.

    Two exceptions do come to mind: gun owners and gays. For whatever reason, these groups love their sarcasm almost as much as their causes. Any epithet you throw their way – the more deranged, the better – they’ll gleefully adopt for themselves.

  7. Sophie'sMom says:

    Being a proud Tarheel it breaks my heart that, as women in this era, some choose to flush the sacrifices of our fore-mothers down the toilet to be viewed as “Liberal CoolChicks”…yes, I just created that term…or, as the sign implies, “Liberal CoolSluts”. If someone called her daughter a slut, how do you think she’d respond? Frankly, I’d hope she’d jump to her daughter’s defense, but with that photo now out, she wouldn’t have a waxed leg to stand on. I am no slut, I’ll not brook anyone calling any woman a slut, and if someone calls my daughter that they better expect a verbal beatdown the likes of which they’ve never experienced before, be they man, woman, child or Loch Ness Monster. I was raised to respect EVERYONE regardless of anything…until they prove themselves unworthy of my respect. This female of the species has done just that.

  8. Carlos says:

    I mostly agree with you, Sophie’sMom, except the part of never calling anyone a “slut.”

    Face it, there really are “sluts” in the world. That’s why the word was invented. It’s not a nice word, it has terrible implications, but would you call a baseball another name, or a train engine another name?

    No, I didn’t think so. If one is a slut, one is a slut. The only thing that can be done about it is for that one to change herself (or himself, as the case may be) because the term is determined by that one’s actions, not another’s decision.

  9. Drew the Infidel says:

    Do you suppose she also knows a trick or two with honey and handcuffs?