(Video) #FastAndFurious “Follow the ideology”

Posted by: Phineas on June 23, 2012 at 2:13 pm

**Posted by Phineas

Or, as Bill Whittle asks at the end, “Have you no shame?” (1)

The ideological reasons behind Operation Fast and Furious are still speculation, but, given the far-left agenda subscribed to by both Obama and Holder, the idea that this might have been aimed at imposing strict gun control is not unreasonable. And it is more than reasonable that Congress should investigate this.

Oh, wait. I forgot. Someone invoked executive privilege to block that investigation.

Meanwhile, somewhere, Dick Nixon laughs.

RELATED: Earlier Fast and Furious posts.

(1) In fairness, while most of the media has dutifully ignored a Democratic president’s scandal —in which people died!— CBS’ Sharyl Attkisson has done a great job from the start.

(Crossposted at Public Secrets)

RSS feed for comments on this post.

4 Responses to “(Video) #FastAndFurious “Follow the ideology””


  1. Carlos says:

    In answer to the question, “Have you no shame?”, they wouldn’t be Democraps if the did have ANY ability to feel shame. The closest they come is when thinking about their own country, but it turns out that’s not shame, that’s pure ignorance.

    That’s just part of the definition of “Democrap.”

  2. Drew the Infidel says:

    I did not get the audio on this but am sure it is generally along the same lines as my sentiments on this. There is little doubt Fast & Furious was nothing more than an attempt to destroy the Second Amendment. All one has to do is ask what the law enforcement objective of this stupid idea was. There was not one! That is part of what is being covered up; God only knows what else is being buried besides two murdered federal agents.

    The “have you no shame” quote comes from an Army lawyer during the McCarthy hearings; when enough got to be too much he asked the Senator, “At long last, sir, have you no shame?”

  3. Drew the Infidel says:

    Correction: The Army lawyer asked, “At long last, sir, have you no decency?” That applies to this situation just as well.