China begs the question: Why would anyone want to “own” North Korea?

Posted by: Phineas on July 10, 2012 at 1:01 pm

**Posted by Phineas

I’ve often referred to North Korea as the “world’s largest prison camp masquerading as a nation.” And let’s face it — it’s a basket-case made in a Stalinist hell: the people are brutally crushed, often rented out as slaves in all but name; the economy is frequently on the verge of collapse, dependent on drug dealing, counterfeiting, and smuggling; famine is an ever-present specter; the regime is nearly isolated internationally as a terror-sponsor and nuclear proliferator; and its almost certain eventual collapse presents nightmare scenarios to the world. So, why would anyone in their right mind want to own it? (1)

I don’t know, but that’s what China has in effect said:

China has told South Korea that it will not allow the unification of Korea under a democratic government. North Korea will remain under Chinese “influence.” If worse comes to worse, China will send in troops to set up a North Korean government that will faithfully follow orders from China. In an effort to dampen some of the anger in South Korea (the United States, Japan, and so on), China would maintain North Korea as a separate entity (and not a new province of China). China wants no misunderstanding about who “owns” North Korea.

Actually, one can understand China’s position. As the linked Strategy Page article notes, China has for years been urging North Korea to liberalize its economy along lines similar to China’s: a form of state capitalism under a one-party regime. For various reasons, North Korea has largely balked and thus often come to China for aid. Pyongyang has also in recent years caused China foreign policy headaches due to its nuclear program, aggressive moves against South Korea, and even harassing Chinese fishing vessels. By all accounts, relations between these two “allies” aren’t at all good.

Thus, as the “big dragon” in the region, China has a deep-seated interest in stabilizing North Korea. A sudden collapse would be almost or just as disastrous for China as it would for South Korea, with potentially millions of refugees flooding over the border into Manchuria and bringing huge headaches regarding food, shelter, and security in their wake.

Almost as bad, from a geopolitical perspective, would be a regime failure similar to that of East Germany’s, which lead to its absorption by West Germany. The specter of the Soviet Union’s collapse soon thereafter is almost certainly in the back of Beijing’s mind, and one of the last things China wants to see is a unified, prosperous, multi-party Korean democracy on its border, giving the Chinese people ideas. The Chinese military, in particular, would blow a gasket if this meant the US military entering the North as part of a stabilization force — which it might, just to secure any nukes.

So, consider this claim of ownership a bit of “defensive imperialism” on China’s part, a message to South Korea, Japan, and their American patrons that “we can handle the problem ourselves, thank you.”

While I’m not in any way a fan of the Chinese regime (unlike certain NYT columnists and US cabinet secretaries), considering the alternatives, I have to hope Beijing is right.

via Breitbart.com

Footnote:
(1) Well, not everyone is unhappy in North Korea. At least Dear Leader Junior gets his Disney stage show and hot date. The rest can go eat grass.

(Crossposted at Public Secrets)

RSS feed for comments on this post.

5 Responses to “China begs the question: Why would anyone want to “own” North Korea?”

Comments

  1. Tango says:

    A few things come to mind here. First, “the Un” – is proving unreliable. Second, the DPRK has a very large army (the ChiComms may want to make use of that somewhere down the road). Third, there’s that pesky matter of vast numbers of mass graves throughout North Korea. I believe the numbers that are buried will exceed that of the WWII holocaust.

    So, China figures keep a lid on things.

  2. Dana says:

    North Korea exists to provide us a valuable lesson. For example. it teaches us the absolute folly of taking a young, untested, wholly inexperienced person, build a cult of personality around him, and then make him the commander-in-chief of a military armed with nuclear weapons. The rest of the world can see that, and no other nation would ever do such a stupid thing.

    Oh, wait . . . .

  3. China playing White Knight to North Korea’s eventual collapse is not a sure thng. They may make a swift move to corner the nukes, if there are really any (those in the most recent parade were fake), but they would just as soon Korea became someone else’s problem for a change, the same attitude the US should adopt regarding Pakistan.

  4. Dana says:

    I disagree with Dave: North Korea serves as a handy buffer zone, keeping those wicked capitalists in South Korea away from their border. The last thing that they want is a developing capitalist nation with wireless internet access right across the border.

  5. Drew the Infidel says:

    At the outset of the Korean War, the Truman administration’s chief worry was a border infringement of Manchuria or Russia’s Coast Province bringing both into the conflict resulting in WWIII. The Chinese would slip into North Korea then retreat back to Manchuria to “privileged sanctuary” (MacArthur’s term) the same way Al-Qaeda does with Pakistan today. In all likelihood, the Chinese and Russians will have the nukes at their doorstep to fight over for their own security, just as we should be ready when Pakistan folds. It remains to be seen what either would want to do with a vanquished Korea; they lost their bets on Viet Nam which is now a nation of “filthy lickspittle capitalists.”