
| USA Today | 0 | |
| James Rosen | Developing; Did senior State Department security officials commit perjury? |
0 |
| NRO | Unreal: Pa. Union Ad: Privatizing Liquor Stores Will Kill People |
0 |
| AP | 0 | |
| NYT | Aww: Reception [Overseas] for Obama Is More Sober Than in 2008 |
0 |
**Posted by Phineas
So, with our embassies burning and besieged, our diplomats murdered, and the scent of war wafting in from East Asia, what does President Obama do? Convene his Cabinet? Get briefings from his national security staff? Ask Valerie Jarrett what he should do?
Don’t worry, Citizen! The fourth-greatest president EVAR!!! knows what comes first:
President Obama didn’t watch SNL season opener this weekend; watched a lot of football, per Josh Earnest on AF1 gaggle.
— Amy Gardner (@AmyEGardner) September 17, 2012
Now, don’t you feel better?
Like I’ve said before, I don’t begrudge presidents their recreational time; they have a demanding, darned hard job.
I just wish he’d try to do it once in a while, instead of just pretending.
via Bryan Preston
RELATED: A very good post from Baseball Crank on Barack Obama’s passivity in a crisis.
(Crossposted at Public Secrets)
RSS feed for comments on this post.
It is not an epiphany to say this is part and parcel of the disastrously failed Obhammud foreign policy. “Leading from behind” simply means someone else (France and Britain) has to lead by default. There are patterns; starting 5/22 there were five terrorist attacks (Red Cross, British diplomatic motorcade, etc.) leading up to the 9/11 US Embassy attacks. Hezbollah chief Nasrallah is using the same phony YouTube video cover story as Obhammud; the interim president of Libya says it was a coordinated attack. DUH! Giving ground to terrorists is a zero sum game; every inch you give, every concession or apology you make, they capitalize on and exploit thereby being emboldened.
B.H. Obama is not the first incompetent to be elected to that office, but he’s the only one who hasn’t even pretended to be trying to act competent, and to pretend to learn the job on the fly.
Unfortunately, the Constitution that he shreds daily and weekly doesn’t list malfeasance, misfeasance or lying as reasons for being impeached. Yes, I personally believe he has done enough things as president to be impeached under the “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” clause, but who’s going to pursue that? Dingy Harry? Mitch? Boehner?
Yeah, right.