E-Mail 'Military veterans to Obama: Too bad, so sad, buhbye' To A Friend

Email a copy of 'Military veterans to Obama: Too bad, so sad, buhbye' to a friend

Loading ...

16 Responses to "Military veterans to Obama: Too bad, so sad, buhbye"

Vethusbandfather says:

September 25, 2012 at 9:50 am

The President goes about ‘courting the veteran vote’ the wrong way. He thinks you win over vets by giving vets free stuff. In reality vets care more about seeing our current fighting forces taken care of than ourselves.
A.Men says:

September 25, 2012 at 9:53 am

Romney/Ryan 2012 in Virginia and the rest of the “57 states with one or two to go”!
LTCHawg says:

September 25, 2012 at 10:45 am

Another term for Obama will give him license to tamper with the military (end strength, pay, pensions, health care). I have no faith that he cares at all for the welfare of this country, its people, or those who have served or are serving it now in the military.
H Hazell says:

September 25, 2012 at 12:33 pm

His edge was prevaporated with this vet!
Drew the Infidel says:

September 25, 2012 at 12:42 pm

The issue of long deployments and other such items were significantly reformed as far back as the early ’70s with CNO Zumwalt’s changes in personnel policy, something the Obhammuds have never concerned themselves with till the elction grows near. As a veteran it is obvious Obhammud will face the same obstacle that caused vets and active duty personnel to vote against Clinton: the question of honor.
If All You See… » Pirate's Cove says:

September 25, 2012 at 1:00 pm

[…] blog of the day is Sister Toldjah, with a post about veterans abandoning […]
Gravelagitator says:

September 25, 2012 at 1:33 pm

As a Vet (‘Nam) I can only say: “Obama 2012?” …” Not only NO, but HELL NO!”
TexasMom2012 says:

September 25, 2012 at 2:39 pm

It is not really surprising after his mishandling of the Fort Hood TERROR ATTACK (not work place violence) and the restricted rules of engagement for our troops in Afghanistan. Not to mention the issue of TriCare. I do not believe our military can be won over by offers of rewards when they can see all the damage Obama has done and will continue to do if reelected.

And also after our seals where killed in that helicopter crash and the families asked that no photos be taken… Remember Obama had his taken as the coffins were taken off the plane and he released that photo. Disrespect of our dead is not an attractive quality.

As far as I can tell, the only thing Obama takes seriously is himself and his campaign. I bet the veterans can see that. I bet they also noticed that the death toll that was once on the news every night doesn’t get mentioned at all since Obama became Commander in Chief. And I bet they have heard of the form death letters signed by robo-pen that are being sent to the families of the fallen. There are plenty of reasons for the military and vets to want a change in the White House and no last minute twist by Obama is going to change their viewpoint.
Carlos says:

September 25, 2012 at 5:31 pm

When it’s obvious even to Duh-1 that he lost the election this coming election and he tries to declare martial law, he’d better hope the soldiers assigned to protect him from protesting rioters don’t hold a grudge about him trying to deny them their right to vote.

Just sayin’…
Ben Hartley says:

September 25, 2012 at 6:06 pm

I’m also a ‘Nam vet, Gravel, and I, too, say “not only NO but HELL NO” to Dear leader (Bless His Heart and May Peace Be Upon Him).

Quite truthfully, Obama couldn’t lead me out a burning building; Romney, on the other hand, just might tell me to enter one, and I just might go.
Paul says:

September 25, 2012 at 6:16 pm

He will be here in Virginia Beach on Thursday “courting” the military vote. Hah!
Dorothy Palmer says:

September 25, 2012 at 6:25 pm

Why does Obama have taxpayer funded secret service protection? The service is sworn to uphold the constitution, nothing else.
Casey says:

September 25, 2012 at 8:25 pm

Ms. Palmer, you might want to (oh, I dunno) actually read about a topic before expressing your opinion.

The Secret Service isn’t “sworn” to do anything about the constitution; I suspect you are thinking of the armed forces.

The Service was instituted to investigate counterfeiting during the Civil War. After McKinley was killed, Congress asked the Service to begin protecting the president.

They succeeded in protecting Truman against an attempt, but alas they were not so fortunate with Kennedy. Congress authorized protection for candidates as well after Bobby Kennedy was killed.

In short, the Secret Service has no explicit mandate to either protect or support the Constitution, except as specified in their role in law enforcement. The roles it plays in today’s society are those explicitly authorized by Congress.

I hope this clears up your confusion.
Casey says:

September 25, 2012 at 8:28 pm

By the way, what I find amazing about that article (it’s been widely cited in the blogger-tubez) is that nearly no one has pointed out that most of those polls showing Obama’s alleged lead are heavily weighted in favor of Democrats, averaging +5% to +8%, with at least one +12% out there somewhere.

I suspect an honest poll would show Romney running 8%-10% over Obama right now.
Drew the Infidel says:

September 25, 2012 at 9:49 pm

@Casey–Agreed. I have said here before polls are nothing more than statistical lies and one of the flaws is the one you point out which is a polling sample with a built-in bias. Another inherent flaw is they all rely on a human being to tell the truth.
“It ain’t so much the things we don’t know that get us in trouble. It’s the things we know that ain’t so.”–Artemus Ward
Jiji says:

September 26, 2012 at 11:01 am

Korea vet here. I do not think the vets and active duty personnel will forget that Oblabber tried to make wounded vets pay for their own medical care. This one won’t.

Comments are closed.