Comments on: In which the Charlotte Observer covers for Obama on the #Petraeus affair scandal

By: Steve Skubinna

Steve Skubinna — Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:27:13 +0000

So, Perry, you really believe that the FBI discovered that the Director of the CIA was compromised, and didn’t bother to mention it to anyone? Okay, that’s your opinion.

It’s also a massively huge level of stupidity. We’re talking weapons grade stupidity here. You, my lad, are a black hole of stupidity, so dense that no coherent thought can escape.

Sure, why would the FBI mention that the CIA director was vulnerable to blackmail? Nobody’s business, right? Unless they put it into one of those intelligence briefings Obama never goes to because he’s too smart to have people tell him stuff.

It must be dreadfully wearying, having to carry around that solid lump of depleted uranium you call a skull.

By: Kate

Kate — Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:57:27 +0000

So the truth turns into a game of chess….strategies to alter timelines, protocols and such! I am totally in agreement with BBHunter…this is a massacre of the truth. You will not get it from the Obama administration and playing nice in Washington now is NOT what is required from Congress. The FBI is tripping over itself to hide information, the CIA is stubbing it’s toes over infidelities…underneath all this soap opera antics we have the death of four people. Blood is on the hands of Obama and his State Department. They must be held accountable for it.

By: Dara

Dara — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:40:58 +0000

@BBHunter

Thanks, I could never have said it that well..!

By: BBHunter

BBHunter — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:07:42 +0000

- Look Mr. Perry, if you’re not a bird brauned head-in-the-clouds illiberal member of the Progressive cult of Jug ears, you’re doing a masterful job of imitating one.

- Here’s a little ideological “truthiness” for you.

- Obama has turned out to be an Uber vain glorious war hawk that makes Bush/Cheney look like Sunday school teachers, and the Left simply does not know what the hell to do about it. They’re running around like a gaggle of chickens, along with the whore media, trying desperately to give the dear leader cover.

- I’m suprised you could even type the words “creditable press” without throwing up on your keyboard. If we HAD a creditable press, which we do not, just maybe you would have heard about the daily protests in front of the White house, and all the Lefties that have chained themselves to the front fence.

- The Commander-in-drones has completely double crossed his failthful starry eyed base, and they’re caught in a political whipsaw they can’t even begin to deal with.

- But don’t worry, the Pravda on the Hudson press will labor on gamely shoveling eveerything they can under the rug.

By: BBHunter

BBHunter — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:31:01 +0000

So stated this, with no documentation whatsoever, therefore next to meaningless opinion.

- So, after 10+ weeks, and a half a dozen diffetrent versions of the “truths” about Benghazi, all of which have been contradicted by various governement agencies, or modified, or walked back with weasle wording obfuscation, but you insist on missing the irony of your statement.

- Good luck with that sport.

By: Drew the Infidel

Drew the Infidel — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:40:43 +0000

The media has already shown itself to be a symptom instead of a solution and this is just fuel for the fire. Consider they would not even cover a terrorist attack on the Benghazi compound and the concomitant murder of four innocent Americans unless it was tied to a sex scandal.
Other examples: They ignore Pearl Harbor Day but go overboard two days later on John Lennon’s birthday; they mourn the passing of Michael Jackson ignoring the death of Farrah Fawcett-Majors the same day; on the eve of invading Iraq the country and the media were more engrossed with the Kobe Bryant sex scandal. You get the picture.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:13:17 +0000

Yep, Perry. Kinda like all of ussuns jumping to conclusions about F&F, too. And ’bout Benghazi to begin with. And at least a dozen other “non-stories” that have not been covered by those esteemed and inquisitive journalists we have been waiting patiently for over four years to tell us exactly who our president is and why he won’t release his academic records (especially since he’s supposed to be the smartest man in the world.)

Doesn’t wash, Bud. Sometimes, one is forced to make assumptions based upon the history of the person one is viewing, and the people he/she surrounds himself/herself with.

By: Perry

Perry — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:17:41 +0000

The idea that Obama did not know of this and it was all disclosed the day after the election is insane.

So stated this, with no documentation whatsoever, therefore next to meaningless opinion.

By: EBL

EBL — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:33:03 +0000

L?ve Shack Baby! The idea that Obama did not know of this and it was all disclosed the day after the election is insane.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:42:59 +0000

The answer to that, then, Garey, is to have him formally charged with…(?)? Seems to me that in an administration as like a sieve as this one is with “secrets,” with a little pushing by investigators someone would spill the beans about who and when.

One has to remember, this entire farce of an administration was designed specifically to allow “plausible deniability” in every situation because they knew from the outset that many of their illegal activities would be “misunderstood” by the yokel turnips out here.

By: Garey Wheatley

Garey Wheatley — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:15:28 +0000

To testify as CIA leader requires the answers to be made or he is in contempt of Congress. As a private citizen, he can be represented and may plead the 5th. That is the difference.