Comments on: Krauthammer: #Petraeus’ affair might explain his September #Benghazi testimony

By: Drew

Drew — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:52:48 +0000

For the life of me I dont understand all this concern over Patreaus’ affair.

Seems to me its just turnaround. The general is now taking orders from his privates…. :d

By: Carlos

Carlos — Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:09:43 +0000

OK, folks, let’s step back a minute and look at the situation in an overall view:

This is the Obama administration we’re talking about.

Petraeus was a part of this administration.

No one in this administration, almost literally, has said anything anywhere close to the truth since Obama began his first presidential run in 2007.

So now the question isn’t “why did Petraeus do this?”, the question is, “Why is anyone the least bit shocked and surprised one of Obama’s soldiers got caught with his shorts down and then hung out to dry?”

The interesting part to me is going to be to see how the Republicans let everyone above Petraeus off the hook.

By: Drew the Infidel

Drew the Infidel — Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:30:32 +0000

This is proof positive the WH already knew about the FBI investigation. They held it over his head to force him to assert the video caused the attack. He was a useful idiot; when the usefulness is drained only the idiot remains.

“For there is nothing hid, except to be made manifest; nor is anything secret, except to come to light.”–Mark 4:22

By: Tina

Tina — Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:26:01 +0000

This is disappointing on many levels, not the least of which is the appearance of US govt involvement in arming Islamists and/or running secret detention centers – or that Petraeus would’ve played along with his testimony to save his job.

Our government needs to be investigated and tried to the full extent of the law – all of them. There is no way Obama did not know about the true nature of the 9/11/12 Benghazi attacks.

By: Kate

Kate — Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:03:43 +0000

This surely will come up when he testifies. The fact that he was beholding to the administration to keep his job…then after the election, the FBI was given a green light to open the floodgates against him proves that this was a politically motivated action to keep things quiet until there was no chance that it would hurt Obama’s reelection effort.

I am totally appalled that this is the way Obama’s administration uses people. I feel they appointed Petreaus as CIA chief perhaps to keep their enemy close….to check his activities. Am I the only one who finds this creepy?