<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA): We need a Constitutional amendment that controls speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/30/rep-hank-johnson-d-ga-we-need-a-constitutional-amendment-that-controls-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/30/rep-hank-johnson-d-ga-we-need-a-constitutional-amendment-that-controls-speech/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t dis or dismiss this miss!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:27:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/30/rep-hank-johnson-d-ga-we-need-a-constitutional-amendment-that-controls-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-947740</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 04:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=48336#comment-947740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally I think there should be a constitutional amendment controlling the speech of politicians, one that would mandate jail sentences for lying, no exceptions and no &quot;depends on what the meaning of &quot;is,&quot; is-type lawyer crap.

That would be one way to rid our society of politicians...they&#039;re worse than cockroaches and have been around nearly as long, and certainly have done at least as much damage to mankind.  Never been sick being exposed to a cockroach, but politicians make me puke all the time!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think there should be a constitutional amendment controlling the speech of politicians, one that would mandate jail sentences for lying, no exceptions and no &#8220;depends on what the meaning of &#8220;is,&#8221; is-type lawyer crap.</p>
<p>That would be one way to rid our society of politicians&#8230;they&#8217;re worse than cockroaches and have been around nearly as long, and certainly have done at least as much damage to mankind.  Never been sick being exposed to a cockroach, but politicians make me puke all the time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great White Rat</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/30/rep-hank-johnson-d-ga-we-need-a-constitutional-amendment-that-controls-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-947700</link>
		<dc:creator>Great White Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=48336#comment-947700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Isn’t there a danger that adding another amendment might cause the Constitution to tip over?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why bother with an amendment?  Obama, AKA &#039;our Lord and Savior&#039;, has said that the Constitution is an &#039;imperfect&#039; document with &#039;deep flaws&#039;, which explains why he (oops, sorry, He should be capitalized when speaking of the deity) feels he can disregard it at will.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Isn’t there a danger that adding another amendment might cause the Constitution to tip over?</p></blockquote>
<p>Why bother with an amendment?  Obama, AKA &#8216;our Lord and Savior&#8217;, has said that the Constitution is an &#8216;imperfect&#8217; document with &#8216;deep flaws&#8217;, which explains why he (oops, sorry, He should be capitalized when speaking of the deity) feels he can disregard it at will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Skubinna</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/30/rep-hank-johnson-d-ga-we-need-a-constitutional-amendment-that-controls-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-947677</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Skubinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=48336#comment-947677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t there a danger that adding another amendment might cause the Constitution to tip over?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t there a danger that adding another amendment might cause the Constitution to tip over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate in MI</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/30/rep-hank-johnson-d-ga-we-need-a-constitutional-amendment-that-controls-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-947311</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate in MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 09:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=48336#comment-947311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And of course, limiting the free speech of corporations would also extend to limiting the free speech of unions, right?
No?
I&#039;m shocked, I tell you, shocked!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course, limiting the free speech of corporations would also extend to limiting the free speech of unions, right?<br />
No?<br />
I&#8217;m shocked, I tell you, shocked!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/30/rep-hank-johnson-d-ga-we-need-a-constitutional-amendment-that-controls-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-947189</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 05:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=48336#comment-947189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uh-huh.

Here&#039;s a better idea, Mr. Johnson, sir:  How &#039;bout members of Congress be required to live under the same rules the rest of us peons do, and have to make the same &quot;investments&quot; into such things as Social Security and Medicare and not have your platinum insurance packages or your special retirement packages and pays (last I heard, when a person is retired by management - that&#039;s We, the People, in case you don&#039;t know -  involuntarily they rarely get a golden parachute the likes of which most of us never even dream of) so that we no longer have a ruling class like we do now?

And the best way to get such a thing started is to get rid of idiots like you, Mr. Johnson, who obviously feels threatened by such vulgarity as &quot;&lt;em&gt;private money&lt;/em&gt;.&quot;

Speaking of which, if you happen to succeed in silencing corporate money, will that silence extend to union monetary influence, too?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh-huh.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a better idea, Mr. Johnson, sir:  How &#8217;bout members of Congress be required to live under the same rules the rest of us peons do, and have to make the same &#8220;investments&#8221; into such things as Social Security and Medicare and not have your platinum insurance packages or your special retirement packages and pays (last I heard, when a person is retired by management &#8211; that&#8217;s We, the People, in case you don&#8217;t know &#8211;  involuntarily they rarely get a golden parachute the likes of which most of us never even dream of) so that we no longer have a ruling class like we do now?</p>
<p>And the best way to get such a thing started is to get rid of idiots like you, Mr. Johnson, who obviously feels threatened by such vulgarity as &#8220;<em>private money</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of which, if you happen to succeed in silencing corporate money, will that silence extend to union monetary influence, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew the Infidel</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/30/rep-hank-johnson-d-ga-we-need-a-constitutional-amendment-that-controls-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-947156</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew the Infidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 03:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=48336#comment-947156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The constitutional liberties that allow corporations, or anyone else for that matter, to express their opinions are the very same liberties that allow Johnson and his commiecrat cohorts to spout their mindless drivel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The constitutional liberties that allow corporations, or anyone else for that matter, to express their opinions are the very same liberties that allow Johnson and his commiecrat cohorts to spout their mindless drivel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redgypsy</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/30/rep-hank-johnson-d-ga-we-need-a-constitutional-amendment-that-controls-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-947137</link>
		<dc:creator>redgypsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=48336#comment-947137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This would be almost comical if it weren&#039;t so utterly dangerous and frightening. Maybe Johnson is a fruitcake, but now that he&#039;s said it, the idea is out in the open.  

Sorta like the old adage about never saying the word &quot;divorce&quot; to your mate--once the idea is out there, it kind of oozes around and picks up steam (or in this case, more nasty ooze from like-minded others).

Just when you think the libs can&#039;t come up with anything else to negate the Constitution, here they come... oozing out from under their rocks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be almost comical if it weren&#8217;t so utterly dangerous and frightening. Maybe Johnson is a fruitcake, but now that he&#8217;s said it, the idea is out in the open.  </p>
<p>Sorta like the old adage about never saying the word &#8220;divorce&#8221; to your mate&#8211;once the idea is out there, it kind of oozes around and picks up steam (or in this case, more nasty ooze from like-minded others).</p>
<p>Just when you think the libs can&#8217;t come up with anything else to negate the Constitution, here they come&#8230; oozing out from under their rocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dooling</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/30/rep-hank-johnson-d-ga-we-need-a-constitutional-amendment-that-controls-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-947133</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Dooling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=48336#comment-947133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incredibly dangerous. This would put the government in the position of deciding which corporations have &quot;free&quot; speech, and ultimately licensing reporters and editors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredibly dangerous. This would put the government in the position of deciding which corporations have &#8220;free&#8221; speech, and ultimately licensing reporters and editors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ST</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/30/rep-hank-johnson-d-ga-we-need-a-constitutional-amendment-that-controls-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-947129</link>
		<dc:creator>ST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=48336#comment-947129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love it, Sefton!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it, Sefton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sefton</title>
		<link>http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2012/11/30/rep-hank-johnson-d-ga-we-need-a-constitutional-amendment-that-controls-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-947126</link>
		<dc:creator>Sefton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 23:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sistertoldjah.com/?p=48336#comment-947126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We need an amendment to control idiots from putting morons into public office. Not sure how to word it, but perhaps a quiz on Guam&#039;s geological stability would be a good start.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need an amendment to control idiots from putting morons into public office. Not sure how to word it, but perhaps a quiz on Guam&#8217;s geological stability would be a good start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
