Obama administration arms Syrian Muslim Brotherhood?

Posted by: Phineas on December 13, 2012 at 12:01 pm

**Posted by Phineas

Seal of the Muslim Brotherhood

I recommend reading all of Barry Rubin’s article on the factions in Syria, information that’s becoming more relevant as the civil war there seems to be entering its endgame as the battle for Damascus begins.

It’s this last part that jumps out at me, though:

The Libyan government gave 50 percent of the funds to finance the budget of the Muslim Brotherhood-dominated Syrian National Council (SNC) budget. Since Libya is very much a U.S. client, it’s reasonable to conclude that the Obama Administration encouraged this generosity. Yet this money was financing a Muslim Brotherhood front. A lot of arms have been flowing from Libya to Hamas and other terrorist groups in the Gaza Strip and to radical forces in Syria. Some claim that the U.S. government was coordinating that traffic though this has not yet been proven. But at least indirectly the U.S. government was helping to arm the Brotherhood by overseeing Qatar and Turkey delivering weapons to the Brotherhood’s militia without making any attempt to identify and arm moderate and non-Islamist forces instead.

This means the Obama Administration was using a barely disguised channel to pay for a revolutionary Islamist movement seeking to take over Syria. The fact that this group was also anti-American, antisemitic, and genocidal toward Jews seems significant.

The rest of the SNC budget came from Qatar (38 percent) and Saudi Arabia (12 percent).

If the administration thinks they can buy influence with Muslim Brotherhood groups –remember, the Brotherhood sees itself as waging “civilizational jihad” against us– then they’re either nuts, naive, or both. If the SNC comes to power, I advise all US Foreign Service staff there to carry weapons at all times.

(Crossposted at Public Secrets)

RSS feed for comments on this post.

2 Responses to “Obama administration arms Syrian Muslim Brotherhood?”


  1. This pro-jihadist foreign policy disaster is just one more in the long unbroken string of failures that has characterized the Obhammud administration. Very early on we could have coordinated with some of the very few allies we have left in the region to have engineered a better outcome. That we did not is despicable in the sense that we had an opportunity and the power to do something beneficial but sat idly by until events overtook us.

  2. Polly says:

    I agree with every word you wrote save one. In place of the word failure I would substitute the word success. I believe that is part of the agenda and has been all along. Obungle is way smarter than he is given credit for. He is emboldened because he can say anything and do the exact opposite without ever being called on it. As mere mortals we cannot question a false god.