Comments on: Gun control hypocrite of the week: #MTP’s @DavidGregory

By: Michael

Michael — Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:54:49 +0000

One wonders how a suggestion by the great Clinton can be a great idea in 1994, but absurd and hateful when uttered by the NRA 18 years later.

http://articles.latimes.com/2000/apr/16/news/mn-20323

By: Carlos

Carlos — Tue, 25 Dec 2012 02:43:56 +0000

In taking Drew’s thought just a little further, since when did sprinkling a little Chicago Holy Water on a proposed illegal activity (F&F) make it suddenly OK, let alone legal? Had this been done by a Republican in the same manner and with the same results we would already have a presidential resignation. Proof of the complicity of the LSM is in the fact that not even they will pursue the meme that GW did the same thing with his program, which tells me that GW’s was thought out and failed but Obhammed’s is not only a failure but illegal by both United States standards and international law.

By: Drew the Infidel

Drew the Infidel — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 21:19:31 +0000

Enforcing the laws already on the books would be a good place to start; laws like trafficking, “straw purchasing” to funnel weapons to people of questionable and/or criminal character, etc., namely ATF. They are all government employees and could be easily brought to heel.

By: Drew the Infidel

Drew the Infidel — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 18:50:25 +0000

As noted previously we will have to accept some form of the Israeli model for school security. But Americans typically cannot grip the reality due to three obstacles; ingrown stereotypes of other societies (every Israeli is a Mossad assassin), only the US has the biggest and best of everything (“it can’t happen here”), and antipathy to, and abhorrence of, necessary adjustments to lifestyle (substituting wishes for facts). To be dismissive or ignorant of elementary truths in this situation is called lethal fantasy.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 18:17:14 +0000

Wasn’t it He-Who-Walks-On-Water himself that said “You don’t bring a knife to a gunfight?”

The same can be said for “talking down” a shooter once on the grounds of a school, theater or mall. And those intelligent enough to realize that, as long as guns are manufactured anywhere in the world, they will be available to those determined enough to get them. For those not that determined, it takes only a modicum of skill and determination to create one.

But again, that’s for those intelligent enough to deal in facts and reality. That obviously leaves out not only Gregory, but He-Who-Walks-On-Water and the 51% of those that voted for him, too.

By: Great White Rat

Great White Rat — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 18:05:30 +0000

“as good as an idea as you think this is, it may not work.”

Oh well, then, if it can’t guarantee that there will never EVER be a single causalty ANYWHERE from guns in schools, then by all means let’s not try it.

Can anyone here recall an instance where Gregory opined on one of Obama’s harebrained schemes – maybe Obamacare, or the giddy support for the “Arab Spring”, or blocking the Keystone pipeline – and advocated against it because “it may not work”?

Nah, I didn’t think so.

As for having his kids in schools with armed guards, no shock there. He’s a leftist and therefore by definition much more important than you or I, ST. His spawn are therefore entitled to privileges and rights that other people’s kids are not.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:37:52 +0000

Let’s not forget that during the Meet The Press discussion that David Gregory may have violated a Washington D.C. law that places a ban on large capacity magazines.

LINK

(h/t: The Patriot Perspective, via http://drudgereport.com/ )