Comments on: (Video) #Benghazi: Sen. Rand Paul to Hillary – “I would have relieved you.”

By: Carlos

Carlos — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:00:43 +0000

Considering the overall competency of elected officials today, and specifically considering the overall competency of officials in this administration, I would say that Hillarious is imminently qualified by Democrap party standards to be her party’s chosen standard-bearer in 2016, should Dear Leader fail to usurp our government and become Tyrant-in-Fact, not just Wannabee-Tyrant-in-Action.

By: Kate

Kate — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:42:19 +0000

She denies getting pertinent information related to security issues…then she should have some righteous outrage directed to HER STAFF. Were they hiding this information or were they directed not to distract her with such trivial issues?

Funding was not an issue. Ms. Lamb testified to that and now Hillary wishes to throw out that red-herring.

Number one problem…truth is incovenient. The American people do care when someone dies for their country. Obviously these elected and appointed folks don’t see it that way. Power is the bottom line..attaining it and maintaining it. God help the USA.

By: Jim McDonald

Jim McDonald — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:32:43 +0000

This expresses the classic lib lack of logic – They are never responsible for their failures.

If these murders were an act of random violence, or an accident, then that would have been a tragic event that we could learn from, and work on to prevent future occurences. However, that is not the case.

There were several serious security breaches before hand, everybody on the ground asked for help. In addition, the local security hired by her were know to be corrupt. Add that to the unbelievable incompetence that Military backup was not available and it was 9/11 – makes this horror unacceptable.

Ms. clinton is a despicable, faithless creature, who should have resigned in disgrace.

By: Brontefan

Brontefan — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:19:38 +0000

I really like Rand Paul! And for Hillary to sit there and ask what difference it makes? is almost insane. It’s the difference between political LIES and SPIN —and the truth. I realize Democrats really dislike the truth and facts upset them, but clearly, we have an issue where this woman did not do her job. I suppose now she will want to be POTUS?

By: WMP

WMP — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:59:20 +0000

I really like Rand Paul – I like what he stands for and he is a rational voice. I think he is more articulate and rational than his Dad was.

By: Drew the Infidel

Drew the Infidel — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:59:03 +0000

As nasty as the 2012 presidential campaign was, with Obhammud setting the tone for it, “you ain’t seen nothin’ yet” is quickly gaining ground. As an example, this “diplomatic disorder” Shrillary supposedly experienced that delayed her lie-filled testimony can be used against her in the same manner it was insinuated Michelle Bachmann suffered from gender-specific migraines.