* Lobbying and supporting government financed abortion on demand to protect children.

- Can you spot the absurd hypocricy between these two statements. I’ll bet you can kids.

Basically, we know that abortion is for the convenience of the woman who finds that the pregnancy will present problems…it’s an inconvenient time, they don’t want anyone to know about their “mistake”, they don’t have the monetary or emotional support to raise a child and, of course, there are some actual medical/emotional reasons that sometimes I find hard to evaulate, such as in the case of rape (where the child is punished for the actions of another)or perhaps the unborn child is medically evaluated to have medical issues cause the child to have many disabilities.

That said, we do have the medical technology now to reduce unwanted pregnancies, we have effective forms of birth control for those who condone the idea. And there is that old fashioned idea to abstain from behavior that leads to pregnancy. The problem is that the present generations have effectly distanced the reasoning for sexual relations from it’s scientific purpose…to create life and prolong the species. Now it is more of a recreational activity purely for the pleasure of the individuals involved. Forget that there is always a risk of pregnancy. That’s how DEVOLVED this current culture has become!!

When an individual is under general anesthetic for surgery, and even on a ventilator to ensure proper airway, that person has been rendered “non-autonomous” and, by definition, wholly at the mercy of the attending medical personnel as to whether nor not that person survives the procedure, regains consciousness and rejoins living society.

Likewise, if you suffer a stroke, heart attack, or other sudden debilitating condition, you may — for awhile at least (maybe even 9 months?) — be unable to “survive” without outside medical (cf: biological) assistance.

In either case, is the life above “not as important” as otherwise normal, healthy, non-hospitalized lives?

Sadly, there are those who would answer, “Absolutely!”

But what is scary is that it’s such a short step from where they are with the above argument to ridding society of its “weaker” members (you know – the ones born without “normal” intelligence, those who’ve lost limbs or are paralyzed, etc.)

And the amazing thing about that is, they don’t have a clue that they, individually, are just as liable to not be included in the “correct” classification as the next person or the person they themselves deem to be in a “weaker” group!

But then, consequences have never been of concern to the statist mind…

The Marxist mentality stinks!

I wonder how successful Margaret Sanger’s wishes have been ? What percentage of white pregnancies (Margaret Sanger-approved) are terminated by abortions as compared to what percentage of black pregnancies are terminated by abortions (which abortions further Margaret Sanger’s beliefs) ?

So what we have here is the liberals – who boast so loudly about how grounded they are in “science” – deliberately ignoring scientific data because it contradicts one of their – well, let’s call it a sacrament. Abortion, to the leftists, is a matter of theology, not science.