Mere coincidence: campaign contributions lead to government loans?

Posted by: Phineas on March 3, 2013 at 1:01 pm
"Obama loan officer at work."

“Obama loan officer at work.”

Say it ain’t so! “Cause for Action,” which bills itself as a “government accountability” group, took a look at “green energy” loans made by the Department of Energy (1) and found a (not so) surprising correlation between energy companies that made campaign donations and those that were awarded loans (2).

Cronyism in the halls of Chicago-on-the-Potomac? You make the call:

Could the Department of Energy Loan Guarantee Program  be characterized as a breeding ground for cronyism in the distribution of loans through the 1703, 1705, and Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Loan Guarantee Programs? (3)

Cause of Action was able to determine, through publicly available data combined with a FOIA production, that for corporations who have received a loan guarantee of any amount, the likelihood that it made campaign contributions increases significantly. Of the data available, 95% (.95) of DOE loan recipients with less than $1 billion in annual revenue documented political contributions by the organization or senior level staff. Comparatively, only 31% (.319489) of similarly sized organizations that did not receive loans made political contributions in one way or another.

So, winners who happened to make contributions outnumbered losing donors by more than three to one. As they used to say on Laugh-in, “verrrryyy interesting!”

Now, you’ll note the report does not say to whom the donations went. But, look at it this way: parties that lose elections rarely get to hand out the big bucks.

But only a racist would see cronyism, here.

via Steven Hayward, who has other examples of Green failures.

(1) Until recently headed by Steven Chu, of Solyndra fame. Those Obama “investments” sure pay off, don’t they?
(2) Also known as taxpayer (that’s us) money either taken from us directly or borrowed on our credit.
(3) That last is, I believe, the program under which electric car-manufacturers Tesla and Fisker got their Green loans. Oddly, principals at both companies are big Obama donors. Small world, eh?

(Crossposted at Public Secrets)

RSS feed for comments on this post.

3 Responses to “Mere coincidence: campaign contributions lead to government loans?”


  1. Drew the Infidel says:

    Solyndra’s saga dates back to the Bush administration when its application was declined as a bad risk. Enter Obhammud and “crony corruption” and, voila, it was not so risky after all. That is, until it went into bankruptcy.

    The political donors, or “bundlers”, were also rewarded in other ways as well, such as ambassador posts for which they were totally unqualified and in some cases recalled as happened with the Luxembourg appointee. All this is detailed in Michelle Malkin’s “Culture of Corruption”.

  2. Brontefan says:

    Nothing about the current administration’s “transparency” has bothered to hide the fact that the MASSIVE SPENDING is focused on those who promote or encourage the Liberal/Marxist agenda. And as for Academia, it’s pretty much already completely run by Marxist professors who stifle any opportunities for intelligent thought and real critical thinking.

  3. Carlos says:

    But we are taught through the Lame Stream Media (always using Democrap talking points) that the bigger the contribution to the (Republican) party, the bigger the payoff vis-a-vis quid pro quo for the contributor. That’s just a fancy way of saying the payoffs are bought and paid for by bribery which is, the last time I checked, very illegal. I’m sure Mr. My People will be right on this.

    Doesn’t happen, of course, with the Democraps, right? I mean, the LSM makes sure we all know it is strictly a Republican thing.

    I would think this administration should be ashamed of itself, but they’re Chicago thugs incapable of such feelings; however, the people that voted them in can and should be ashamed.