The potential threat to liberty in driverless cars

**Posted by Phineas

And he's driving, too.
And he’s driving, too.

Yesterday, I wrote about the European Union proposal toΒ mandate speed governorsΒ on all cars, which would be automated to force a driver to slow down, should he exceed the legal speed limit. As an aside, I mentioned the trend toward driverless cars and the potential for state control of those. Β (And hacking, let’s be honest. But that’sΒ another issue.)

Jonah Goldberg thought along the same lines this morning and imagined some ofΒ the “fun”Β we could have:

Let’s be fair: The experts aren’t always wrong, and even when they’re wrong, their arguments aren’t necessarily unreasonable given their assumptions. But if you follow the logic of mandatory seatbelts and motorcycle helmets, red-light cameras and anti-texting laws (1) to their natural conclusion, it’s easy to imagine that some bureaucrats will want to co-author your car’s software.

And then what? Will you ever be allowed to go over the speed limit again? Police are already drooling to see our GPS data. Will that become automatic too? Will the cops have the power to tell your car to stop whether you want it to or not? Will authorities be able to tell your car to take a detour to alleviate traffic? Make it turn around when it gets too close to certain off-limit areas?

Whoever thought that driving your own car could be the next “live free or die” moment?

Footnote:
(1) I am, however, strongly in favor of laws against cell phone use and texting while driving, having nearly been run down several times by people paying more attention to their phone than to the road. Studies show phoning while driving is as impairing asΒ driving while drunk. And textingΒ isn’t much better.

(Crossposted at Public Secrets)

Comments are closed.