Federal judge: Chicago’s gun ban is unconstitutional

Posted by: ST on January 7, 2014 at 9:42 am
Gun rights

Image via Fox News.

A clear victory for staunch 2nd Amendment proponents. Via CNN:

(CNN) — A federal judge ruled Monday that Chicago’s ban on virtually all sales and transfers of firearms is unconstitutional.

“The stark reality facing the City each year is thousands of shooting victims and hundreds of murders committed with a gun. But on the other side of this case is another feature of government: certain fundamental rights are protected by the Constitution, put outside government’s reach, including the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense under the Second Amendment,” wrote U.S. District Judge Edmond Chang.

“Chicago’s ordinance goes too far in outright banning legal buyers and legal dealers from engaging in lawful acquisitions and lawful sales of firearms,” he continued.

Chang explicitly did not rule out other types of regulation, short of a complete ban, in order to “minimize the access of criminals to firearms and to track the ownership of firearms.

“But the flat ban on legitimate sales and transfers does not fit closely with those goals,” Chang wrote.

The judge stayed his ruling to give the city time to file an appeal.

Stay tuned …

RSS feed for comments on this post.

3 Responses to “Federal judge: Chicago’s gun ban is unconstitutional”

Comments

  1. The first Ten Amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, apply strictly to the federal level of government. Where the Left is missing the boat is in the exact wording of the constitution as it applies to the intrusion on gun rights. What part of “shall not” do they not understand?

    When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.

  2. Carlos says:

    What part of “shall not” do they not understand?

    Every part, Drew, every part.

    Except, of course, when it benefits them in either argument or buying votes with our money.

  3. Carlos says:

    Chang explicitly did not rule out other types of regulation, short of a complete ban, in order to “minimize the access of criminals to firearms and to track the ownership of firearms.

    And, of course, every law-abiding criminal in the country registers his/her firearm, just to make sure the guvmint can track them.

    What a doofus, a judiciary goober.