Bad news for Dems: Most independents say they will vote against #Obamacare politicos

Posted by: ST on April 21, 2014 at 8:21 pm
Obamacare

Just say no.

Obamacare continues to be unpopular with a crucial voting bloc.  Via Fox News:

Most voters say ObamaCare will play an important role in their vote in this year’s elections, and over half are more inclined to back the candidate who opposes the health care law.

That’s according to a Fox News poll released Monday.

The new poll asks voters what they would do if the only difference between two congressional candidates is that one promises to fight for the health care law and the other promises to fight against it.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE POLL RESULTS

By a 53-39 percent margin, more voters say they would back the anti-ObamaCare candidate.

Independents, always a key voting bloc, would back that candidate by a 25 percentage-point margin (54-29 percent, with another 14 percent saying it depends).

In addition, Republicans and independents are more likely than Democrats to say the candidate’s position on ObamaCare will be an important factor in deciding their vote for Congress. That matters because majorities of Republicans and independents oppose the law.

Some 80 percent of Republicans say the candidate’s stand on ObamaCare will be an important factor to their vote, and 87 percent of Republicans oppose the law. Among independents, 72 percent say the law will be important in their decision, and 63 percent oppose it.

Hate to be the bearer of bad news to the left, especially during an all-important election year … well, no – I don’t. ;)

RSS feed for comments on this post.

2 Responses to “Bad news for Dems: Most independents say they will vote against #Obamacare politicos”

Comments

  1. The commiecrats could not have a more bitter stain on them than if it could be proven that they had a Nazi background. The strategy they are employing to the upcoming mid-terms is not one of playing to win but one of playing not to lose, e.g. running scared.

  2. Should have read, “. . . employing for”.